Member Info for Citytilidie

And ?

This is a completely separate company set up to probably enable them to provide further services to the union and charities ?

Find something else to occupy your time, this angle of trying to discredit the company is futile, go for a walk, read a book or get a hobby.

You have email Lothbury.

Many companies have a registered address different from their trading address ( often their accountants )

People being proved wrong after spending hours trying to rubbish the company and its directors but not prepared to apologise.

Some these posters are actually invested, others not so why waste your day on a company you are not invested in ?

Lothbury the accounts are for year ended 30th June 2023 - MOS currently owe Ignite nothing.

Which part of that do you not understand ?

Companies House Ignite going since 2017

Currently MOS owes Ignite nothing.

Ignite have Unite ( largest union ) and DEC a leading charity as clients amongst others

https://www.igniteamt.com/

I would suggest people scroll the banner of pictures on the home page.

I’ll wait for the apologies from certain individuals on here with regard to saying they had no clients.

I’ll leave you to carry on trying to out do each other on here.

Never heard as much drivel in my entire life - good luck getting the auditors and lawyers involved in something that has already been checked and audited.

Hepseal - i did not say they could be obtained cheaper from elsewhere, I am sure there will be an investor meeting soon so why not submit these questions on there and have them answered directly by ME, they have nothing to hide, you only have to ask.

So that's a no then to discuss the Estadio deal i take it ?

Hepseal - yes you could, why not start saying something about the Estadio RNS and let’s debate and discuss that which will benefit us all rather than keep bringing up historic stuff ?

Just makes no sense that no - one in here who apparently invested don’t want to deep dive into a recent positive RNS ?

Madness.

Lothbury are you reading anything that I am posting ?

Programmers

Developers

Coders

Internet Services and tech advice from tech professionals.

Very simple really, those costs would be paid by MOS to whomever to keep improving and developing, tech companies don’t stand still.

Lothbury do you not have anything better to do with your time ?

Do you not think everything is disclosed to the Auditors?

The relationship between Ignite and Krunch was before MOS therefore once MOS purchased Krunch it became a related party - MOS still needs services for the platform.

It could go out and employ its own developers, coders, programmers and take on all the costs associated with them such as tax, NI etc but that would be much more costly.

If you have ever run a tech business you would understand that - check with the auditors by all means but I think you find it’s normal business practice.

*ignite

Lothbury try and expand your mind a little bit as what the £200k might be for - perhaps they provide tech advice, coding, programming, design etc etc for the platform to continue to improve and expand ?

The platform doesn’t get better and expand itself and you never know perhaps ignore contract these people in to do these services which in turn is the most tax efficient way ?

I have a company that does exactly the same thing.

So that’s put to bed now - anything more digging you have managed to do that doesn’t lead anywhere ?

Probably because you have to register with Investor meeting and pick which companies you have interest in.

Small things amuse small minds.

Will likely be sent again i would think Free Buffet - a mistake at Investor Meetings end.

I have often wondered just how amateurs go about pulling off deals with the likes of BITSO and then partner with some of the wealthiest families in Mexico to create an online betting company with their OWN betting licence ( not piggy back on someone else ) along with a Mexican equivalent of Talksport and then at the same time own 10% of one of the biggest media companies in Mexico who will promote it all to over 25 million people 😏

MORE FACTS.

Tim Scoffham did not receive a further £75000.

The shares paid for live scores have never been sold and they are worth far less than when given at around .38.

Seems people like to make up " conspiracy theories " yet again.

Apparent conspiracy theory below

Quanta owes MOS money from well over two years ago ( and was written off in the accounts ) and now apparently that money mysteriously appears as an investment from W A Technologies that literally has nothing to do with Quanta.

Did they actually land on the moon ?

A FEW FACTS.

1. WA Technology has no links whatsoever to Quanta other than Tim Scoffham used to work there, Quanta was owned by a guy called Andrew Deeks and owes money not just MOS but many other companies.

2. The £675000 was raised from the following sources who clearly see the benefit of the deal and what is to come.

WA Technology 59.27 %

Private Investors 25.94%

The Board of Directors 14.84%

MOS has a 25% stake in both Estadio Bet and Estadio Talk which therefore means other parties in Mexico took the other 75%, would be worth doing some research into who they are i would suggest.

The betting platform invested £400k into MOS - i wonder what they saw in Estadio Bet to make them do that ?