Member Info for Chuggley

Maybe .... either way it means this is about to turn
If he did as you suggest to help some get I'm cheap it would be because its close to big increases .... but that's a big if (but possible)

Partly
But also need and prices that are flying for lithium and tungsten will bring in offtake agreements and that means 3rd party investment and potential pre payment

Agree completely. If any negative from these should have been seperste RSN on different days
Clearly says prem not funding rha. Clearly says income potential from rha
Clearly states zulu is progressing and on target
Yes lots of traders jumped in with negative comments. Plus a few others with their own agendas
Yes George needs to learn how to write an rns with knowledge that any ambiguity will be jumped on with a negative

If you beleive that then we may as well shut zulu too

Sorry I don't understand why they can't do both they will be different teams
RHA is not that far away from being able to produce an uncome and a profit
Alongside that zulu dfs
Especially if rha is funded by an offtake agreement and NOT Prem

Read the final line of the first paragraph.... no funding by prem

Assuming you guys can read of course

https://twitter.com/Premafrimin/status/1423562377182724097?s=19

Not sure I need to lighten up johny. But hey whatever
What it worth. I'm not sure you've ever posted anything but negatives
I can see the traders have all come out from under their dark rocks
And no funding is being diverted from zulu. I'd anything this brings in potential income that helps zulu. So jog off traders.

Like last time this rns was good news but should have been two on seperate days.

I'd disagree the rns was disappointing.... well its content wasn't. It was actually good
Can't say it was written that well though

I'm not so childish. Making assumptions that it won't is just for those trading. The rns does not state that in fact it states on schedule
To be honest I don't care if it takes longer if price of spodumene...lithium continues to rise

It states on track so your statement is just your own opinion
Otherwise it's a good rns poorly written no energy.
Sp down as fools seem to thing funding means placing. Again the rns states very clearly rhs not to be further funded by prem. 3rd party plus off take agreements. This is income

That's a pretty good rns. Should have gone well over 25. But normal that some fools don't read or understand.... it should bounce back shortly

Pilbara now market cap of almost $6b. Prem has we hope a better resource plus other metals Inc gold. What will prem mc be once the dfs proves the resources?

Hopefully you did research and when you bought at 29 you did so for the right reasons
My beleif is 29 will be cheap in the coming months .... I don't trade either so will endure. Like you the ups and downs. But fundamentally this will end up substantially higher. Good luck

I would disagree with him considering the potential in the ground. And he should know being an investor of that size he will have decent information.... to be honest $1 b is Conservative given the multiples in profitable mining ops

Looking forward to reading the statement on future markets and trading of tern and investees. No doubt these will be exceptional

I'm guessing you are invested. But if you're not aware of greasy post history click on him and have a read. I'll happily withdraw my comments if you can find 3 positive tern posts. Think you may have issues finding one

Swanny that's a ridiculous statement
I'm all for balance and constructive criticism but greasy for months has posted nothing but attacks and negativity he is not bringing any value
Out of interest. Are you invested?

I strongly advise everyone to report greasy. Their constant attacks on individuals and tern are disruptive.... they are not and have no intention to be a shareholder just to ensure this bb is not a place for constructive discussion on tern and the investees

Acker .... trading again? Sold a chunk? Looking to buy in cheaper?