Member Info for chique

I find it humorous that you attempt to take the high ground as a 'total western supporter'

I prefer to be realistic about the west and also Russia.

Intent - The threat was made to STOP it
Motive - was there
Means - it has
Opportunity - They were there underwater in June

I am talking about USA , they seem to have a lot of exercises by or near to events like this.

If anything is found in the so called 'crime investigation' that implicates the USA , it WILL be suppressed even by Germany.

Far better would be a non aligned country investigating , and one outside the control of USA and Russia

apparently no where near the evidence criteria is required when Russia is the target for blame.

It then becomes oh.... each side blames the other ... this is very telling comment.

It is however slightly incorrect I think - please correct me

If the 78 is an average of the 6 months then the price now must be higher than 78

I put this question to him and got a sarky answer ' sorry i wasn't clear enough'

Must have been typing a question missed that

how do you arrive at 25%

https://gcaptain.com/whos-to-blame-for-the-nord-stream-gas-pipeline-leak/

https://www.navy.mil/Press-Office/News-Stories/Article/3060311/baltops-22-a-perfect-opportunity-for-research-and-testing-new-technology/

USA had underwater exercises to do with 'mines ' in Borholm , Denmark in June this year right by pipelines.

I think USA have a huge influence on these countries as many of them see the USA as their protector of last resort.

Regardless of USA status and the strong likelihood that they screwed Germany over by destroying this pipeline.

The operators should be allowed to inspect.

not going to comment further on this

slightly more on-topic , I see sweden and denmark (USA) are refusing to allow the nord stream pipeline operators to inspect the damage to the pipelines.

I agree steven49

This 'private interview was held far to close to release of an RNS that had a big impact on the SP , to such an extent that HMI issued one 'clarification' RNS , but in this RNS did not fully understand the reason for the drop.

We really have no idea how long this 'private interview' was, and indeed if we were 'privileged ' to hear all the questions that were asked.

I have put a question on the official Q&A about this interview which in my opinion 'could' offer trading opportunities to those fortunate enough to garner information still not public.

These are only if's but's and could be's , but it is far better to have interviews like this 'after' the official Q&A .

I have put that question in the investor Q&A , as well as the ones that were not answered in the burton recording.

I sent my questions one of which was about the margins and the rehabilitation costs that have appeared in the accounts.

Whilst questions on solar power were mildly interesting there were many other questions put on here that were of concern to investors.

The 7 minutes spent on sales orders vs invoices has also been done to death , the main issue was the RNS and not investors ability to understand there invoicing procedure vs sales orders. This has already been explained in the past.

Was the actual interview longer that 26 minutes?

Very strange set of questions 'published' given what the major concerns were.

Was there a limit on the type of questions he would take as it seemed quite distant from 'discussing results'

I particularly liked the bit where he said dividends would be a way to make up to shareholders for current paper loss due to share price fall.

" Recent board members resigned for personal reasons nothing to do with the company. "

Will have to re-listen

I thought he was referring to his pickiness of new board members

" Why is Poly share price not moving - will all this news ? "

Probably all converts and was not an RNS

so sounds like divi next year all being well

so putting dividend above being debt free

Dividends number one reason to give shareholders some value back - nice!!