Member Info for chique

Good night all , reported last post to here and duran - ex barrister?

sorry guys dropping out now , I normally don't talk to the forum clowns , it was a moment of weakness brought on by reading silly posts. have a good weekend all

You quote what you were told, there is no independent evidence confirming those signs were there at the time

I neither believe all Ukraine says nor Russia , and I know who was gaining from Bucha (a story which has been challenged by westerners)

You seem to lap up all you hear because it's exactly what you want to believe and when we find ourselves in WW3 it will be in part because of people like you (in the polls ) who think very little , that have edged us over that line

You have never seen me comment in such a way that Ukrainian killing of civilians is acceptable or Russian killing of civilians is acceptable

They have both done it , but I do not believe either side has done is purposefully

You however (and your likers ) are a different story and revel in it which I find extremely distasteful

I said " reported , the guy is out of control "

I was only partially correct we have 5 people on here that voted a child killing post up - It is an embarrassment to class those who did fellow investors and also fellow countrymen.

I remember last time they got a private interview just before our Q&A and asked all the questions we put on here

So brian on our Q&A was answering the very same questions

This should be published immediately

That question is on my investor meet company questions

When the interims have just been released you have chosen to give a private interview , not available to other investors until published by the interviewer.

Investors realise that you cannot give price sensitive information but it is most helpful for investors to have 'clarifications' on and RNS that has been issued.

Is it possible to adopt a policy that puts all investors first with regard to interviews of this nature and at the time of obvious share price turmoil due to various RNS's that have just been released.

so much for democracy and rule of law hey with the wink wink - in other words rule of law only matters when people say it does , typical and quite inconsistent

even worse someone put a like on it

reported , the guy is out of control

pandamonia Not going to comment on your last post , but please do some proper research on this company before showing your ignorance. You would be better keeping quiet then people might think you are knowledgeable on the subject.

got mine in

I have never mailed Brian direct only ever used online can you post the email 'part ' before the @ sign

"In the recent interims I see:

Rehabilitation expense of A$216,272 in 'Cost of Goods Sold'
and, separately:
Provision for rehabilitation of A$298,279 in 'Non-Current Liabilities' "

This is correct

Is this a live interview? anyone got the site?

does anyone have email for harvest , I normally use the online but direct will be better

One thing came to mind and it needs clarification but is this something they are allowed to put into the accounts to reduce future tax burden but may not actually spend at the end of the day.

In other words just an accounting method for tax purposes

This needs some answers , in the past rehabilitation has appeared in non current liabilities note 17 in 2021 accounts

trading4good - I am just over 50% in cash at the moment ( just in here and POLY ) and have been for a few months - what's your best share , apart from HMI , that you think may deserve some research