Ruck18 Jun 2019 19:24
""The debate is whether there are in fact "hard to treat" cancers as I stated originally or whether they are all the same as Inanaco has tried to argue all afternoon."""
Is it really?? Not IMHO
Reading back on the BB (again), it seems the debate is actually a continuation of the feud between you and Inanaco, which is a shame as the topic is very real, and from now my lung cancer is certainly ""untreatable"" which is down not so much because of the cancer, but as Inanaco mentioned other complaints like heart failure, to name one, has made it impossible to have treatments that could matter. Will certainly be interesting to see what my cause of death will be, taking into account so many diagnosed conditions down as untreatable.
As much as i agree with a lot of what you say, I do believe you goad inanaco unnecessarily, I would rather enjoy what he has to offer than finding faults with how he says things, and once again the most worthy posts are written by crumbs with no personals distracting him.
See what you can do guys, we got 170 share chats on Thursday, heard from many posters for the first time in ages, and the share has a positive feel, why destroy at and back a couple of losers who are posting to incite only?
Glad we ended up the day level, just for myself and not trading, I called Mondays share action correct and said that buyers would return sub 6.50. Seems to have been the way, and tomorrow have a feeling the bid will let go and spread shortened as we lead up to trial.
See what you can do guys, I hate to say the filter button is an option, but perhaps it is here, there are many of us fed up with the pettiness at a time when so much could happen for all our good.
Catch yer tommorow, had one of my 24 hours sleeps last night, yep it was coming. Goodnight