Member Info for CHELSEA7

68k.......................7.2/7.30? hmm

At 7.40.....................for me!!!

7.20/7.50

Bought since the tick down to 7.50!!!!

Damn these bank transfers

At 7.40..............................not delayed

Hi botski, no, pretty sure a pre arranged sell, the trade was just concluded at 16.29.

Makes no sense at all with all the buying at 8.30 to see such a buy at 8.14 with no corresponding sell. Just shows the MMs IMHO needed shares.

Dose first patient............................

https://www.pharmaceutical-technology.com/uncategorised/pfizer-and-biontech-dose-first-patients-in-us-covid-19-vaccine-trial/?utm_source=Push%20Notification&utm_medium=website&utm_campaign=industry_alerts&utm_content=standard

7/7.50 - 9.94%

Nice Response.....................

Time Trade Price Volume Value
13:39:31 7.50 150,000 11.25k O
13:39:28 7.50 50,000 3,750 O
13:39:25 7.50 50,000 3,750 O

Buys 513k

Sells 987k

Trades 59

Bank Holiday zzzzz..................................

sorry( I just thought that poorer economies, of which Italy is, could take higher risks because of the state of their economies.

It would appear that sadly this is what seems to be behind this decision.

Nom,

Couldn"t agree more. Whilst I posed the question

Using modelling to predict what will happen in Italy in their opinion as they move out of lockdown.

If 20% went back to normal routines there would be an extra 5000 fatalities.

If there was a 40% increase in mobility there could be an extra 23,000 deaths.

This is based on Italy entering a phase two of its lockdown and lifting restrictions.

Question is.......why are they doing it??

7.5375/7.5875

Thanks Krafty, that is what I call coordinated media, using the University before mentioning Scancell.

I think we have all noticed a reluctance to ramp up a company where shares are publicly traded??

At 16.29 yesterday.

I would think that solves our 8.30 riddle.

Inanaco, just reading Lochinvar Lases last post, can you post an outline as to how our science would work in finding a cure for COVID 19??

That is how I see it Ray, it is unthinkable that a Daily Rag would pick up on an AIM listed company looking for funding into finding a vaccine for COVID19. Quite something different if they were to actually get that funding in place IMHO.

It is only the seventh trading day since our RNS re the virus, I would hardly deem that to be negative at all.

7.50/7.60 _6.21%

You actually said this........................

I'm sorry to say there is NO sign at all of the coordinated media response mentioned by CH to C7 (atm). Just ProActive and a few scraps in Trade media. That is, apart from the David Evans helpful intervention which gave us the Times article, in which unfortunately Scancell's name did not appear, plus the mirror image, a brief mention. Par for the SCLP course.

And you chose not to answer my question......................What do you perceive Coordinated media response to be???

Krafty, welcome back, long time no hear

I get the feeling we could remind ourselves it is not just Scancell who are involved here........................

Scancell to initiate development of novel DNA vaccine against COVID-19



Scancell Holdings plc, (AIM:SCLP), the developer of novel immunotherapies for the treatment of cancer, announces that it has initiated a research programme to develop a vaccine for COVID-19. The project will be led by Professor Lindy Durrant, Chief Scientific Officer and Professor of Cancer Immunotherapy at the University of Nottingham, in collaboration with scientists in the newly established Centre for Research on Global Virus Infections and the new Biodiscovery Institute at the University of Nottingham, and Nottingham Trent University1.

I can only imagine between all parties there were very positive feedback to our joint plans. I do not understand TF why you are so dismissive of all parties ability to be granted funding to continue these studies, based on not making the front pages of the Sun!!!