Member Info for Chelsea11

CW - what do you see as the relevance of the content of the link you posted, to Scancell please?

Point of clarity. No one, at any point, told or even suggested, that CW stopped posting.

Anyone else reckon the car taking Lindy to AACR is a DeLorean?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FWG3Dfss3Jc

I don’t see why it wouldn’t be. Conference attendance is booked in advance. Things change.

Oh and btw, great conversation:-)

Thanks Crumbs, so to pick out what I see as the key words in the context of this thread.

What is not acceptable in a Trials in Progress abstract?
• It is improper and forbidden to include results or preliminary data; any abstracts that include such information will be rejected.

However as has been pointed out, at AACR, you have to be in it, to win it. Who knows what conversations will be had and what significant connections might be made. Possibly conversations that can include the content of a corresponding RNS - if a relevant one comes out ahead of the conference.

Have a good Sunday.

Thanks for all responses. Much appreciated.

Berm / Burble.

You have a view on this please?

You guys probably know better than me but wouldn’t there be a delay between the scan and the formal process of evaluation & documentation? Would that present a risk to Lindy being able to confidently present data on the results of those latest scans on 18th?

Just a question, not a challenge and if I’m missing something obvious, please point it out.

I’d have to agree, there are too many links posted here that are at best, old news everyone is well aware of or at worst, not directly relevant to the Company and are therefore just “fog”.

That might be an unpopular opinion but is how I see it recently.

Really hope you’re more right than me. As always, time will tell.

2 years maybe, to get back close to 50p?

CW - same post as Sunday and commented on as nothing to do with Scancell, or their vaccine approach?

Thanks for pointing out that difference Berm. Interesting.

WTP / Chester.

We’re all on the same page - we want Scancell to succeed.

Just slightly differing opinions on company communication strategy and that’s cool.

Fingers crossed for a good week ahead.

Yeah but has the AVCT SP shot up as a result of that RNS? I don’t believe announcing conference attendance in that way, is that important to be honest. Those who need to know, do know already via alternative sources - IMO.

We all know companies who put out news just for the sake of it which doesn’t help their profile. I’m comfortable that Scancell will put out the bigger news when they can. Roll on Q2.

Sure but a trial exploring personalised mRNA Tech, is very much ringfenced from the Scancell direction of travel. Or put crudely, nothing to do with us. In the same way that dozens of other cancer vaccines trials aren’t.

Unsure of any link to Scancell here.

Personalised MRNA Tech, not our bag.

Assume also then, that the “Strategic Partnership Agreement” (LOL) with Yourgene is also dead.

“All hell breaking loose”

Definitely sounds like a future RNS title :-)