Member Info for chasf

Every seller has a buyer if the trade is made in the book (A trade). Otherwise they (usually) are sold to an MM in an O trade and they sell them on when they can. Since the MMs haven't been particularly active in the book, I suspect they aren't too bothered about their holdings.

Given the number of shares in issue, and the false rate of the buy/sell classification, that's not huge.

It was leaky during the last placing, hence the large rise before it.

"made some progress and dragged the feet for most part.. Always finds an excuse.. "

The notion that HAA is deliberately delaying is just ridiculous.

"2) Delay. Not communicating the current status of TK funding."

As TW has observed, having a periodic RNS let alone a daily one that has nothing yet to say is just a waste of time. When something has happened, it will appear.

If I move my price up they jump over my order, so I'll stick for now.

Because that's how you buy? I've got an order in but I can't get it to the top where someone might hit it.
See what happens during the auction.

It's consistent with some previous rises to RSI 70 unsupported by RNS (followed by moving back down towards RSI 30)

Sadly it appears I can't place an order on the bid without several automatically jumping above it.

I hope it's towards the end of next week, by which time Indian bank bureaucracy might finally have processed my payment.

"north of 1.4p" is a little underwhelming, though

"continually making promises he has *no intention* of honouring" a curious view (emphasis mine)

Realistically they've got to sort it out soon or there will be a money problem like the debt build-up last time.

A recent one? Must have missed it.

where is the TW comment?

I admit that "formal update" does hint at a placeholder.

I hope it's later this week because I was planning to whack some into my SIPP but the money is taking ages to arrive for reasons.

This has nothing to do with HAA fan-clubbing, just fairly obvious if you've had to do even deals of modest size, let alone as big as this.

It would also be incredibly disruptive to the existing deals and with the govt to replace any senior person now. Just foolishness.

It's funny how manu turns up yet again with the same ANS reference.

Anyway, Harry isn't "dragging his feet" about finance, which would imply that Speaker-like he has to be dragged to the post. They're apparently waiting on EG for several assurances that must be made legal commitments. It's a bit pointless sending out RNS on those ("well, we're prodding and waiting") not least if such a public approach might be counterproductive.

tbh, I've got some money coming in so jan would be better for me.

if they're waiting on some government action, that's all they can do, wait and prod.