Member Info for chasf

I suppose someone's trading the spread in O trades against the MMs (so the absolute level doesn't matter), setting the price using A trades, and the bot keeps the trading far enough below the placing price that there won't be unexpected dumps of shares to disrupt it. Still, a rebound this afternoon would be pleasant.

"With at least 1 TR-1 due." I'll be impressed if one ever turns up!

Where's PortfolioPower to ramp it when it needs it?

It's like Snakes and Ladders, this share.

It's not really active enough for a SETS share, but I expect that will change fairly soon. I've not really sure what the ALGO bot is up to; when there are two they seem to jiggle quite a bit for 10 seconds or so working out a stable relative position. It would be easier to hit one of them then just for fun if IG would show and allow the 3rd decimal place in the price.

There's a spoiler who turns up at 1400 fairly often.

I don't see new institutional investors there

Might pick up tomorrow, there seems to be a bit more buzz in media.

Low volume and plenty in the .70s in the book. A TR-1 might ginger things up. (Unless it's selling!)

Yes, it's just the dilution affecting the voting rights. A director's sale would need a separate notification, and anyway the total's the same as it was in February when they did the same thing.

Given the volume that's appeared camped on each point on the ask between 0.69 and many shades of 0.71 I think my hope is not fully to be realised.

Still, always good to have a new 52-week low. It's usually the only success story for most AIM shares.

Some people just never learn.

I'm hoping that the Conditional Placing placees really will be more inclined to hold, on the grounds that unlike the Firm part they wouldn't have been able to dump in a pump, although the risk of the shares not being agreed was negligible, so they might have forward-sold anyway. The volume is a bit low today.

"Is it finally going to happen?"

Perhaps magnify and focus the writing on front right notebook. There's a little diagram on one page, quite a few notes on many pages. Unfortunately it all goes slightly out of focus when enlarged enough! Anyway, I think so!

Unfortunately my simple interface doesn't give the labels so I don't know which MMs are sitting where, which is sometimes useful (eg, company brokers) but they can make it anonymous if they are trading on their own account.

1.7m clustered at fractional offsets of 0.68 on the bid, 1.1m from 0.71 to 0.73 on the ask. Not a lot of trading in the book; mainly O trades. The A trading is mainly (or entirely) ALGO. On the other hand, there isn't the "dumping" onto the ask there was last week. I think Friday had 10m on the ask at one point, unusual here (with market size of 500k).

Some chunky bundles dropped by some of those "sticky fingers" on 13 May now showing up.

It's a problem that this share is on SETS but there's simply not usually the volume *in the book* to sustain it.

They could easily have been put there as barriers large enough to hold the ask for a much larger O trade, and then simply withdrawn when it was done. I've certainly shuffled things up and down in the book, not least because of the jumpy-bot that undercuts prices on the ask down to a limit: put an ask in and immediately jumpy gets below you, drop it a bit, and it moves again, withdraw completely and it goes back to the higher price again. Generally the MM-bots keep within the bid/ask boundaries in the book. That's why you see things pushed down to tiny differences here (0.698 0.702).