Member Info for chaotic_calmness

Yep, paying amanda and then Nick and then on top of it 2 and 20% performance fees of Riverfort Capital along with their director (Nesbitt) salary. Shareholder shafting (Massive dilution through placement at less than NPV of shares) is what we have seen so far from the three... They got to walk the talk....with so my listed companies in the portfolio, they got to move their ass. And not just sit on their ass, by investing and then doing nothing to help the portfolio companies. Help PPG in securing the capital they need to expand their power portfolio.... Help ARCM

As an existing shareholder you may wait what the offer terns is during placements for holders....

In oversold territory, any newsflow about feedstock would surge the price upwards....

Looking to be a buy day.....

The story had not even started here.....

Traders would probably start taking profit from now onwards....I am sitting tight....longway to go....

Any upgrade in resource reserves at Casa or Zamsfort project can lead to a price runup similar to last year's price rise of Mariana Resources who were bought out by Sandstorm Gold. Majors and Chinese producers are circling Africa for their next big resource. And ARCM has got two of the most in-demand metal projects in kitty.

That's some significant stake building going on.....Casa and Zamsfort seem to be the main engines, and sturec deal could turn out to be the power booster here.....the price rise would time well with macro and micro factors....last time casa directors sold an asset in Africa, the investors in their previous undertaking made a killing....

Still curious as to how many shares PRS own individually from their listed companies portfolio. But the lack of details in quarterly update is quite appalling....All we have seen in the first five months of PRS operations this year is massive dilution aka shareholder shafting. Just help PPG in achieving their corporate objectives, those 49 million shares that PRS hold could be the key to negate the bad investment performance of last five years...

and on the RNS announced today, PRS mentioned that this tie up with Riverfort capital is going to cut their listing cost due to utilization of their investment infrastructure, but wouldn't the 2% fee of the net asset value eat the admin cost of runnning the company and negate any savings that may been created with the tie up?....Just the PPG and ARCM investment alone would raise the market cap here by manifold. Mila Resources can run their listed company in less than �50k a year, what is stopping PRS to emulate that? Riverfort Capital seems like a leach trying to dilute the shit out of existing shareholders, as if one corporate leach wash not enough (Nick)......

why do Prem need to sell it so quickly, the true potential of arcm and circum is anyway 12-36 months away. those stakes could turn out to be non-dilutive source of future funding for core projects..

Profit margin would get better as and when the proportion of the recurring revenue increases with regards to total revenue.

Recurring revenue streams is the key.

That ARCM stake could be the hidden value multiplier for PREM. Its waking up, and could become one of the only junior cobalt producer in LSE in less than 6 months.....when considering the huge potential of the Circum stake along with ARCM, PREM seems so undervalued.

Time to add more.

And this is how long term shareholders are shafted - one placement at a time.....If they know that the current net asset value of the company is more than the current share price, then why raise the money at heavy discount to outside shareholders. Just give the whole placement allocation to existing shareholders before going outside. Shareholders shafting at its best..And why pay 2 and 20%, when the coming mining boom is going to raise all the resource stocks anyway.... Commonsense is not common at all. PRS could save cost by meeting all the CEOS of mining companies at mining conferences regularly held in London. The next one is in November at county hall, directly go the horsemouth rather than middlemen like riverfort capital.....You don't need middlemen like riverfort capital to find hidden gems in less than 500-800 resource stocks across LSE, ASX, NYSE and TSE. PRS investment in ARCM is doing well without the help from Riverfort capital, If the whole �6m is invested in ARCM, it would still give returns multiple of the current market cap and they don't need to pay the 2 and 20% performance fee. Shareholders shafting at its best...

Investments in Circum and ARCM alone is worth the current market cap let alone their various projects, undervalued massively....

Boost to feedstock supplies would remove the bottleneck in efficiently utilising the US plant. Should be back to year high by year end....

Pivotal year for arcm....recent developments not factored in current share price at all...any one of the three projects in Zambia, DRC and Slovakia should make the price rise by 5x-10x on its own. And if all three fire on the same time, then 100m market cap would not seem too distant considering that DRC is close to being an colossal gold mining projects on it own, and Slovakia is one joint venture away from unlocking the value as indicated in its last PFS study (NPV : over $100m). Cobalt over $85000 per tonne is an massive boost for the limited production plant at Zambia... DYOR

The pressure is building up. Very few junior exploration stage mining companies like ARCM in AIM. 2 PFS stage gold mining projects, 1 limited production stage copper-cobalt project and the last one is also a low capex gold mining project. Interesting time ahead.