Member Info for Chaebol

"Massi, stop embarrassing yourself.

I’ve been calling for a lower SP and no MiCA for a while and you were busy pumping this sinking ship. The 'here and now' is that the stock has been in a death spiral and I predicted every inch of it, while you’ve sat there holding bags and talking absolute rubbish.

You’re sounding exactly like Kat—years of noise with zero notable gains to show for it. If you’ve actually 'called it right,' where are the receipts? I showed my work in 2021 and I’ve been proven right again in 2025. You, on the other hand, just talk in circles while the chart bleeds out.

Don't mistake my accuracy for luck; I’m on point, you’re just a clown shouting at a brick wall. You show me a winning trade from your world instead of just talking about how great you are at winning .

And so it contiinues..........

Yup who cares but you both keep going on about it !

Im not boasting about 60k lol said it was a good trade, you and BFD got twisted about it. and wnet on and on, its taken days to accept in your minds the trades are real and maybe you'll write back even disputing that fact.

If we gonna boast about 2021!

I would only boast about Argo that saw a few million, and many argo boys can attest to that, they just hated when I went short on it! even splatted !

Here and now massi Ive been well on point with his stock for the last 8/9 months in the here and now that you talk about......

Again you and BFD banged on about it.

I never expected such scrutiny from screenshots of trading sheets and stmnts. You and BFD made it far bigger than it ever needed to be.

'So I guessed right no short'. Genius....... aren't you.

Considering for weeks ive said its closed ! I am glad you twigged x;) 2025 was fun and its done and dusted, now what ?

This has been a failure by the current BOD and I'd like to see some heads roll for this ineptness over the last couple of years, a complete RNS highlighting what the plan/pivot is, as imo EMI and MiCA are dead dogs, and if i like the pivot the changes at BOD level and the price, I might, but lots has to change here.....

Hoping by July full clarity on failed EMI and MiCA is in the public domain and then we have to see what BOD have in mind.

Lets hope so ! Markets been tough this year !

Could do with a win GL !

I was gambling on no MiCA and pretty convinced, but now at this level on a CFD no thank you.

I think you mean CFD's are not for beginners otherwise 80 odd percent wouldn't lose? and say stuff like I tried that years ago and lost.....

This is a much tougher stock to short paper wise

Had to go the CFD route to get the money down I wanted and avoid disclosures. I shorted main stocks and you ideally do it with paper but this was very different to YU. and Argo years before.

I wish id had 10-15 million hsort paper shares on the 31st could have got that to sub .3's but it is what it is.

Only paper short share I bought here was in jan 25 to hedge against my long instead of selling them and then the rest was leveraged CFD's

Special ? Where did i say that ? 60k profit from 15k in 6 days was a great trade which it was, then faced all sorts of delusion about it. It's been quite a trigger.

Argo was the win in 2021. Like I've said Id forgotten that gst was that decent and actually thought id only made 40 50 points. But argo was all my attention at the time, serious profits! Real money x

Definitely a 'waist' if you dont know what you're doing and if you can't spell it, then no wonder you lost hard and cry into your pint muttering mugs game when maybe you're the m.......

Lets not get deluded again. Youre getting fixated on 2021. Let it go!

You just asked me for a recent win, I told you and now im going on about it,lol .....you're going on about it now.....my most talked about subject today is the market abuse rules.

Why dont you Massi. You keep telling us how much youve allegedly won

Lots of wins last year for me here and coin.pl.....come on keep up.

Lol but it was ok for Aim to think he was calling my boss to say i was skiving off ?

Its ok for multiple posters to be complaining to Admin about my posts ? its ok for People to have attempted to set up templates of complaints!

But when I actually float the idea of someone causing market abuse rules, im the sad act, its a shame you didnt have or display same scruples with users here that repeatedly suggested telling on me.

As Massi says thats cognitive dissonance dude x;)

Wink.

They will be available at much lower prices imo, but I told you this at much higher prices.

Retail winners always happy to overpay I guess.

I don’t know what to say about your delusion Billy for December, but let it sink in that December was my best month here. One day you may even understand CFD’s.............. lets put some historical facts into the equation, on the 1st December SP was 0.68 p and on the 31st December it hit a low of .335, half its value in a month, the perfect playground for a short.

You claim to buy repeated longs at well above this price today and you’re insisting you burned me lol the sp has been in a downward doom loop since July and yet somehow you burned me billy. This is the highest delusion i think ive seen yet.

Come out of your simulation and wake up.

Valid Points

Public statement as potential evidence: Claiming "I (and my family) own 100 million shares" on forums (e.g., LSE.co.uk boards) implies detailed knowledge of the aggregate and possibly viewing it as a unified block. This could suggest: A common policy or coordination (DTR 5.2.1R cases (a)/(b)).

Indirect holding/control (case (h)).

Informal arrangements are captured: DTR 5.2.1R includes de facto understandings and patterns of behavior—not just signed contracts.

Threshold crossed if aggregated: At ~4.3%, a coordinated block would exceed the 3% threshold, requiring a TR-1 notification (and ongoing for further changes).

Broader transparency/market integrity: Undisclosed aggregated holdings undermine DTR 5's purpose. Publicly touting the block to influence retail sentiment might raise separate issues under UK MAR (e.g., if misleading).

Overall Assessment Chris overstates the legal certainty—the forum claim does not "effectively admit" to a disclosable position or automatically prove aggregation/control. It is not conclusive on its own.

However, it provides reasonable grounds for suspicion and follow-up. The company would be prudent to:

Quietly seek clarification from the individual (if identifiable).

Review any known holdings or voting patterns.

Monitor for future TR-1s.

Consult the FCA or advisors if more evidence emerges.

Dear Tim,

Thank you for your reply.

I certainly respect your thirty years of experience in senior regulated roles and as a public company director. It is precisely because of that experience that I am sure you appreciate why a public claim of a 100-million-share (c. 4.3%) coordinated family block is a matter that cannot be dismissed under the DTR 5.1.2 transparency requirements.

As you will know from your extensive career, the FCA does not require a formal contract to exist for a TR-1 obligation to be triggered; the mere existence of a "coordinated policy" or "indirect control" (DTR 5.2.1R) is sufficient.

I am pleased to hear the company is looking into this. Given the individual in question is actively disseminating this information to the retail market, I look forward to seeing the appropriate TR-1 disclosures on the Regulatory News Service (RNS) in due course, or, conversely, a clarification from the company to ensure that a "false market" is not being created by these claims under UK MAR.

I have copied the FCA for their awareness of the specific claims being made in the public domain.

Again many thanks for your assistance in this matter.

Kind regards,

No AI was harmed during these exhanges 1/2

Dear Tim,

Thank you for your response and for the clarification regarding the Equity Shares (Transition) category.

While I note your point regarding the lack of an "explicit agreement," I believe your interpretation overlooks the fact that both FSMA Section 422 and DTR 5.2.1R are specifically designed to capture informal understandings and de facto arrangements, not just formal signed contracts.

To be clear, my concern regarding FSMA Section 422(3) is not that this party has reached the 10% "Controller" threshold, but rather that this section provides the statutory definition for "Acting in Concert" which informs the disclosure obligations under DTR 5. Under FSMA Section 422(3), the FCA generally treats family holdings as "acting in concert" where there is a clear pattern of coordinated behavior.

The commercial reality here is that an individual is publicly stating on investment forums: "I (and my family) own 100 million shares." By doing so, they are effectively admitting to:

* A Common Policy: Holding and potentially voting the shares as a single strategic block (DTR 5.2.1R Case (a)).

* Coordination/Control: The individual clearly has sufficient influence or "indirect holding" (DTR 5.2.1R Case (h)) over the family accounts to be aware of the exact aggregate total.

If this family block has reached 4.3% (approx. 100 million shares), they have crossed the 3% notification threshold under DTR 5.1.2. If this block is being coordinated but not disclosed via a TR-1, it undermines the transparency of the listing regime. Furthermore, if these claims are being used to influence retail sentiment on forums, it risks crossing into the "dissemination of misleading information" under UK MAR.

As you mentioned that the company wishes to know as much as possible about its larger shareholders, I trust you will investigate whether these public admissions of a 100-million-share "family" block trigger the mandatory disclosure requirements that maintain market integrity.

Kind regards,

Dear Chris

 

We note your concern and please be assured that the company will look into this.  I do have over thirty years’ experience of these matters, including in senior FCA regulated roles and as a director of a number of public companies, and I believe that the responses I have previously given are appropriate.

And like ive said Massi I wasnt just using Lloyds for GST

It was 60 odd k profit which was obviously not recognised by me at the time because of the mayhem of argo.