RE: Jameson Land, Greenland14 Aug 2024 19:11
I'll be clear. It's not my fault for using 2 devices for which the system interprets with different nicknames. Basically Cat/amnesia is me. There's no need to go to the trunk to look for username registration dates as if we were little children. We are big people trying to understand what is done with our money. I at least want to know what will become of mine. I don't care if RM is beautiful or ugly, tall or short...as long as he brings me good profits, so much the better. And I don't even want to get into arguments and have fun with people I don't know. Don't bring me RNS with a reputation for fresh water when deep down it's brackish. No one is a redneck and stupid to be treated like a fool. The BOD has already made several schemes and procedural tricks, in the second place screwing the minority shareholder. RM has its tail on the hook but in this process the money it buried is basically what it invested, so at the moment it is playing with the profit margin of what was sold at the peak. We all know that. For me... I just want it to bring me profit but to make it clear that at least it doesn't make me look like a fool. I understand your moves. I neither blow up nor sink JAY's reputation. For me, I just want science. By the way, Jameson's study is clear. There is an extraction margin depending on the drilling depth, but there are mineral interferences that can interfere with the profitability of the process. It's not an excellent reserve but the potential is good-very good. To use a website info as reference is half way to get blindfolded.
Sign In
Follow the stocks
