RE: Musings...24 Jan 2021 10:20
Morning Trek,
A highly valuable qualitative appraisal; I have no real comments that would run against your assessment. Thanks for the effort. All that you mention is valid and has been part of my own ongoing risk assessment and validation.
To correct you on one area, just for your own sanity, I think there is a little error in the RNS in terms of labelling. You state "There is no cross section for white tank and yet CRBC0041 is a significant find. It’s at best confusing at worse a little sloppy. They have determined the Barns’ orientation but what about White Tank."
Well, White tank is there, it is just under the Barns label in the table and in the cross-section.
What is interesting to see is the significant distance from both Barns and White Tank of hole CBRC0039 - it's on the border of both prospects, yet is showing mineralisation. It gives credence to the pathfinder approach in terms of being able to trace gold in the basement, where ordinarily one might not have drilled, based on previous results, thus whilst not able to throw up nuggets, it is certainly proving to be a step in the right direction in terms of early stage detection. Perhaps, with time, the pathfinder approach will become more quantitative as well as qualitative. But you need lots and lots of data for this to happen, so over the coming years, as we build that dataset, we will become even more adept at interpreting the data.
Good analysis and grateful for the input.
Caribs