Gordon Stein, CFO of CleanTech Lithium, explains why CTL acquired the 23 Laguna Verde licenses. Watch the video here.
Agree with pebble. Trades too small to be a leak on settlement.
However we are only a couple of months away now.
If they do settle it could be any day. Most litigation cases are resolved before court. Now is the time line I had in mind.
It is a game of chicken and would be up to last minute
Andy
we are agreed on the fact that the system is wrong - should be accurate data. the fact that there isnt is the old knowledge is power thingy. the mug punters are kept in the dark
where we disagree is posters not being honest in their comments..eg knowing the system - which is pure math. however trying to use the fact that a few individual trades were specifically mis represented (when there are prob hundreds of thousands every day) as a suggestion that this is specific to this share and for a reason.
if the system has been explained multiple times - as i this exchange between us - then there is no excuse for not understanding it. it really isnt rocket science.
so either there is some extreme stupidity or else there is an agenda.
now look at the posting during the various pump and dumps on here - the continual repetition of misleading info or downright lies.
one has to face the reality that some believe that what they post on here can affect the SP. some want to make money or recover from severe losses..some are pretty nefarious in their postings.
if you believe some don't say this on purpose then i am afraid you might be the one being naive
"I'm afraid I don't agree with that statement"
Well we are going to have to disagree on this - i have read these kinds of statements hundreds of times over the years on various boards including this one.
sometimes it might be through ignorance of the system but at other times it is being disingenuous .
There have been postings before on here how the system works - so hard to believe anyone is still that ignorant.
Andy - since anyone who invests should know this fact -that it is pure math. Trying to imply that an individual buy is being portrayed as a sell - for a reason - is in itself manipulation. usually to express that the MMs are playing games and holding the price back...usually followed by in cahoots with the big boys for a takeover etc etc.
it is one of thousands of transactions that are listed wrong in a day.
the only thing that matters is SP movement.
significant volume of significant value in one way will move the price in that direction
Andy .
Anybody with a grain of research knows that as you said the buy or sell is defined by which side of the average on the spread is. This is not manipulation ..it is on a maths basis. Do you really think they are looking at the cnsl prices with all the other shares they have..all 6 trades?..lol
It is another ramp when people try to insinuate that mysterious forces are at work.
The only real objection is that they could give an accurate transaction..
I mean if we can put a man on the moon.it should be possible
Hardly any shares...just 200 million ..lol
Good post atan - i agree with everything you say..this is to soften up
And also that you know the share better than anyone else on here -
The good news on the RNS this morning is that the company is starting to try and generate froth - by releasing RNS.
At least they are showing some interest in shareholders - the only nagging question is why? why now?
bonus time?
poor end of year results coming?
i am really looking forward to seeing results in next couple of weeks
Unfortunately these talks are not necessarily aimed at the major buyers.bit like the education ones.
The talks in the first 3 months have not resulted in any new significant contracts...or there would have been an rns .
Andy..lse aren't patrolling the forum.
If posts get deleted then it is because they have been reported.
We know that the most regular poster reports anything she can that criticises the company. They have told us.
I also suspect the poster who came on yesterday...who only ever pops on to have a go...but then seems to report any post that responds to him .
Attacking me ...won't change the research..
Reality is that the science is against igg.
Mip...you do make me laugh...you come on here on a bank holiday to tell us not to post?
Lol...self awareness at is height
"Research still being done so anything previously said doesn't matter"
lol.....really? is that how you think research works.
i know you are trying to pump share to get out but that is plain stupid.
should we believe the American academy of allergies / bupa / nhs or kate calder trying to make coin
Worth bumping this thread - with actual list of bodies recommending not to use IGG tests
including American academy of allergy - remember the "target market"
Sniffer - did you read the article? it is not good news for cnsl as they have the contentious IGG test not IGE
"For food allergies known as Immunoglobulin E (IgE) allergies (the most common type), there is a skin prick test or allergy blood test available. These tests will show if you have IgE antibodies. Having these antibodies suggests you are sensitive to specific food allergens. If this matches with your symptoms, you are more likely to be diagnosed with a food allergy.
For food intolerances there is only a reliable test for lactose. Other intolerances are usually suggested after other possible causes have been removed. Sometimes an elimination diet is also recommended. This is where you remove certain foods and record your symptoms at the same time. It is done to help establish a link between what you eat and how you feel."
this is part of the problem that cnsl went from a credible "scientific test" company to dealing in a more "crystal corner shop"
"Who you warning, didn't you say the share wouldn't go up? "
really that is what you have understood from my recent posts?...or another lie?
the readers can decide
"You are always wrong in your predictions."
another lie
1) you accused me of being wrong on recession - announced today
2) numerous sp predictions right since the massive drop from £1
3) predicted the placing - even though company said no placing needed
4) predicted the poor trading updates of last two years and subsequent sp drop on release
lets see what sp is when results are announced in april
Down 5%
don't say you werent warned....
Company has sought legal advice and have stated that they will be vigorously pursuing a counterclaim of 7 figure amount. Which could be up to £9,999,999
NO FIRSTLY COMPANY SAID£1M + WHICH INDICATES BETWEEN £1M AND £2M....PROB NEARER £1M...OTHERWISE THEY WOULD SAY ALMOST £2M OR £2M
SECONDLY IF THEY WERE VIGOROUSLY PURSUING - THAT WOULD MEAN A COURT DATE
,now along with the Royalty payment of upto £1m from Accubio for the sale of Visitect CD4 test
AS ATAN POINTED OUT CURRENT ACCUBIO SALES INDICATE £40K PER YEAR FOR NEXT 3 YEARS
, becomes a tidy amount if further cash in bank along side there £4.4m which was there at the 6 monthly results.
AS COMPANY CONFIRMED THAT IT WOULD BE ANOTHER LOSS MAKING YEAR AND RESULTS ON TRACK - THE CASH FORECAST OF £3.8M IS PROBABLY A SAFE BET FOR THIS WEEKEND
I am out to.
Was the line of unlikely....
That is the end of any hope ..took a big loss
I think they will lose gov dispute and have to pay back £2.5m ..a contract is a contract.