Member Info for calderkate

Trader-If only you had sold then as opposed to your 12p

I think he's been a ramper since he was able to get a good buy in price after his constant negative remarks/posts, each to their own how they get their buy in price.

Trader- It was a polite name for your usual mouth piece, my reason for asking is no one knows all details of the Transtional services agreement for the sale of Alva site, and as you said yesterday the payment received yesterday didn't say how much or if ODX still has any connection to the ABC test?

Trader- Do you or your associate know if the UKRTC is still operational and has ODX any connection to the ABC Antibody test still?

Does anyone know if ODX has any connection to the ABC Antibody test still?

Supposition

Trader- Hindsight is great if £1.20 was such a good price why didn't you sell at that price. Me myself I think I sold some shares at £1.08 not quite as high as your figure stated but I don't think that many people were able to sell at that price.
But perhaps they are all deluded like you keep referring to me

Trader - Forgot to say a Royalty stream payment alongside the significant payment for CD4, so profitable

Trader - Correct me if I'm wrong as I understand.
End of March 2022 cash of £1.5m.
Placing money of £2m
£300,000 a month loss x4 months end of July =£1.2m
Plus £628,000 payment from Abingdon
£2.928m
So no need to use overdraft then significant payment for CD4
Then concentrate on H and N,last two years increase from £6.8m - £8.6m so significant increase in sales from here can be expected
Trader,

Trader- More important will be the disclosure of the sale price for CD4 which has been referred to as significant payment. Alongside thus payment there will be a Royalty stream payment for amount of tests sold. Isn't this more important for you to be concerned about Trader, as I said earlier, soon to be in the 4p range

It's more than Captain thought we'd get.
But as I've said before he only posts after event or speculates with continuous posting.

Now now Trader, it says money owed due to supply of goods contract of 19 October 2020.
You know how much money was owed it has been posted on here before

Trader-It says payment received, due to money owed. That implies that the money owed has been paid. It doesnt say part payment or reduced payment, for money owed.

I agree why doesn't he give everyone a bit of peace and quiet.
By the way don't forget the Royalty stream payment which is included with the significant payment for the sale of CD4.

Trader- Two different things

It states payment for the money owed, not a payment for the money owed

Trader- Soon in to the 4p range?

It says that Abingdon confirmed that a cash payment had been received from DHSC. If Abingdon have accepted a reduced amount for settlement that's for them to decide. We had a deal with Abingdon and it states payment has been paid.

Trader- I think you'll find it is in the RNS today, announces that it has received payment from Abingdon Health, it doesn't say a payment.
This would imply that the due money to ODX has been paid.
If there were yo be ra reduction it would say a payment, so stop trying to talk this news down.

You may be correct in what you write, me myself I cannot see the point in someone consistently posting here like Captain does if he isn't invested.
Especially as when he was invested, he persistently talked down the share. Irrespective of whether he was correct or not he was supposed to have had money invested.
Madness to talk down or to point out things if it's gonna cost you money. Something just doesn't sound right.
I've posted before what I think and the sooner everything is sorted the better. Especially the government pre production payment dispute, as he still refers to this even though he isn't invested and he posts that he hopes no none looses money and he hopes people get some or most of their losses back. What he doesn't realise( or does he).,is that with him repeating the same things he is contributing to any further losses that may occur.
Lucky that there is so much positive things to be disclosed where he won't be able to argue with what is said.
Captain- significant payment for the sale of CD4, the one that you said they may not be able to sell.
Also included in that sale is a Royalty stream payment. Our payment from Abingdon is also to be paid soon. I think Captain also said that we may not be getting that payment.
With this money and money remaining from sale of Alva there will be no need to use the overdraft facility which is there as a safety net.
From the Royalty Stream payments and the sales of H and N means that this will be a profitable company going forward. Another thing that Captain said he couldn't see it being profitable.
So as I said before what does Captain know.
If he was to say something and it then happened would that be correct yes or no?