RE: A question for LTH's7 Dec 2018 13:12
I've been here since 2016 so it has hurt. But i participated at 2p in decent size and that has helped average things out. to answer your question directly. yes, the original investment case still stands. I bought back then because i was convinced that global household and personal care companies (unilever, reckitts, J&J, l'oreal, etc) had under-invested in product technology over many years and the same was therefore true of the spec chemical companies that supplied them. the reasons for the under-investment are many but perhaps the most significant was that since the financial crisis these companies had been rewarded handsomely because of the quality/stability of their earnings.
Therefore senior managements spent more time on balance sheet manipulation to give earnings growth/stability rather than taking risk with product innovation and they were very well rewarded for that (look at buy-backs, debt issuance, etc. in this sector).
At some point, innovation, spurred by sustainability needs, was going to kick in and ITX was a very clever niche provider of solutions that these companies would need. Of course, ITX Investors and management believed it would happen more quickly than it has and we've paid the price for it. Even the demerger at Akzo Nobel last year was unfortunate for ITX, so there was a bit of bad luck in the mix, too.
however, we're here, now, and i'm comfortable that this new management team are very focused and very well incentivised to get things right. I'm happy to sit here for your three years and see where the share price is at....