RE: Question for bushy tailed6 Apr 2021 12:02
Apologies that rather not so succinct reply, was from my mobile and subject to predictive text, fat fingers and sleepy eye....
To confirm... Exploration is not a cost of production and is included in the circa 2 million deduction i quoted. However it's not really conducive to the argument that HUM is "NOT" NET cash positive. So long as there's a gross profit on the AISC, there's NET cash growth.
The balance sheet is NET cash positive, so whatever Debt is paid off for in the period actually improves the NET cash position in the opposite direction of the payment, even though it's a deduction.
For instance, If a company has 2 million in the bank and 1 million in debt, the NET cash position is just 1 million. If the company makes 1 million and uses it all to pay off the debt then the net cash position is then 2 Million or a 50% NET CASH GROWTH for the period.