RE: Copper6 Jan 2026 17:00
FS ..I was referring to OP, various estimates here have been around 50 million. Yes I would have preferred a sale for around 30 million, maybe even 20 if it had removed the need for dilution for the reasons already stated. No just a question of avoiding loss of value of 30% of all assets when fully diluted, this could have generated a special dividend if above 20 million, and caused a rerate due to a 20 million war chest which would have also accelerated development rather than is plodding on while awaiting the optimal deal.
Of course there may have been no interest in this alone, but with so much “interest” being touted by the Exec we don’t know and I do believe, given the hype, we should have at least had some clarification on why they needed to enact the dilution. I’d like the Exec to explain rather than just the guesswork of the flock.