Member Info for Brombarb

14:27
Yep but anyone who invested in 88E over the last 12m or even before has for what ever reasons ("the market is always right") would have potentially made a whole lot more money in 88E (even if UOG is no slug) and surely that is what we invest (trade )in AIM for.
1 year return 378.25% vs. 241.3%
YTD 181.1% vs. 69.66%
I am fully cognisant that 88E is an exploration company and not a producer so unlikely to be producing profits, if that is important for you then just invest in producers.
No one can predict what the future may bring we potentially have news to come on further Farm Outs during the next few months on our projects, resource updates and a vastly extended investor base, our money our choice.
https://www.londonstockexchange.com/stock/88E/88-energy-limited/company-page
https://www.londonstockexchange.com/stock/UOG/united-oil-gas-plc/company-page

08:01 if you refer to the ANN issued today - No

178.4M (1.42%)

0.023 AUD = 0.01285 GBP

ASX (close)
2.3¢ +4.55%
VOLUME 114.3M

Chi-X (close)
2.4¢ +6.82%
VOLUME 64.10M

10:57 Reaper007 is one of the good guys here so happy to clarify.

08:31
"HRZ Thermal Maturity – Peak Oil Generation Window
Measurements taken from both core and cuttings have confirmed that the HRZ shale at the Charlie-1
location has a vitrinite reflectance value of 0.9 (VRo %), which is within the peak oil generation window.
This was also confirmed by isotope analysis of mud gases recovered whilst drilling. The confirmation
of the thermal maturity model is very encouraging and further work is ongoing regarding producibility
of the shale"
https://clients3.weblink.com.au/pdf/88E/02279719.pdf

09:09
https://www.petroleumnews.com/pntruncate/90654407.shtml

08:49
I think that it was probably Paul Basinski who talked about the HRZ flowing like conventional or gas.
"If you go out and ping the internet and look for the oil production of volatile oil - you won’t see any numbers. Because it’s only recently understood even what it was. It’s always gone with either black oil or wet gas. But the point is that it has extraordinarily different properties. So in the sub-surface it’s in what they call super-critical phase.
And what we’ve learned at the EagleFord is when you produce it - it flows like a gas. When it gets to the surface, most of the gas is very, very rich oil. But - as it leaves the pores, and the pressure goes down and then gas forms in the pores - the gas in the pores creates another energy system in order to increase the recovery factor. That’s the reason why you get recovery factors because you basically have another artificial assist. And that’s the reason why EOG and ConocoPhillips have such extraordinary wells.
So this is an unusual phase and it provides it’s own energy in order to be able to get recovery factors that are like 15%, 20%, 25%. So this is extraordinarily important."

http://88ewiki.wikidot.com/presentations:09092016-london-transcript

08:23
Many thanks for your explanation and view point.

19:35
Last | 3:44 PM EDT
0.019
quote price arrow up+0.0017 (+9.83%)
Volume
177,319,927

12:35
treat others as you would wish to be treated yourself, seems to be an old fashioned value these days unfortunately.
:-(

88E correction
https://www.petroleumnews.com/pntruncate/246659331.shtml

ANWR Native peoples not all in agreement with Biden
https://www.petroleumnews.com/pntruncate/965974655.shtml

14:16 I hope so :-)

151.2M (1.21%)

0.022 AUD = 0.0124 GBP

ASX (close)
2.2¢ - 4.35%
VOLUME 91.55M

Chi-X (close)
2.2¢ -4.76%
VOLUME 59.64M

16:55
The last two ops announcements mention various analysis to be completed and they are distinct analysis as stated
"The cores have now been sent to the laboratory for further analysis."

"Fluids recovered via downhole sampling will now be sent to a laboratory to determine hydrocarbon"

"Further work, integrating the results from logging with the seismic, is required to map / re-map the volumetric potential of these zones."

I did also state "possibly" as to timescales and different locations for analysis.

Not sure I actually inferred anything!

I have no problem with
‘A schedule of expected results will be released in the coming days once timings of the various analyses are confirmed.’
I read that as we have several distinct analysis's in progress , core, fluid. wireline then each will have a different date for completion.
Possibly different labs, offices, timescales to complete.
Simples really when you think about it.
:-)

07:51 OTC like AIM has market makers (effectively) trading so reported figures should my opinion be halved to accurately compare to a matched market.

07:51
it's all relative.
pre 12/3/21 last nights SH volume would have been considered quite good , OTC has produced quite a change.
across AIM*, ASX & Chi-X
March 2020 1410M
March 2021 21,839M
* gross

188.1M (1.5%)

0.023 AUD = 0.01288

ASX (close)
2.3¢ -8.00%
VOLUME 129.9M

Chi-X (close)
2.3¢ -8.37%
VOLUME 63.02M

19:06 You do not need the rig in position over the borehole to conduct a flow test, in the original plans for project Peregrine the intention was to complete the Merlin drill to TD production case if applicable and then move the rig onto the Harrier pad whilst Merlin was tested.
The rig and flow testing crews can effectively be remote from each other.
You may want to look at posts from garrym79 who unlike me has experience and experience.