Member Info for Brighterfuture

I thought you wasn't talking about finished products though? I know I'm not so why you're even thinking about government payment is beyond me.

The procurement rules are set to make sure companies selling to the government are paying their parts/materials suppliers within a fair time schedule. If the data meet the criteria then they won't pass the selection phase to be eligible for government contracts. If you want to talk government payment schedule, the timescale gets even shorter.

Read this and I'll await my apology. Once again your ineptitude to research instead choosing to bite back with random garbage has won you jester of the year for 2025.

The Procurement Act 2023 introduced more stringent requirements to ensure that suppliers in the public contract supply chain are paid within 30 days. From 1 October 2025, government departments must conduct regular ‘spot checks’ on contracts worth more than £5m per year to ensure smaller companies at lower tiers of the supply chain are being paid within 30 days

Oh deary me, everytime I return to this shameful share the town jester has made a fool of himself again.

Maybe learn the actual platform (not that anyone's ever seen it).

As for defence spending, "the government has set a standard of 95% of all supply chain invoices to be paid within 60 days for organisations who want to do business with government. Suppliers who do not comply with the Prompt Payment standard could be prevented from winning government contracts". Given how long syme take to get an IM done the plane would be built.

You also had a 'feeling' we'd get Wl IM news in April.

I feel your feeling a numbness in the part of the brain that's used for critical thinking

Peak, after delisting it would be private trading so agm wouldn't be obligation but shareholders could request a general meeting if they had a percentage. Companies act 1985 section 368.

Was the suspension voluntary or involuntary?

2g the intercompanies were integral for removing liability on a default so hardly a waste of time.

The fact the whole platform has changed multiple times from 5 years ago tells me that Az had zero clue if or how it was going to work.

The likelihood is that previous IM's haven't passed scrutiny and the auditor isn't willing to put their name to fraud.

Nothing to suggest this won't be struck off

Https://miamidadefl.mugshots.zone/fernane-jacob-mathew-mugshot-04-01-2025

https://www.stocktitan.net/news/HMBL//

Syme redacts client names so you can't investigate their audits which would show whether true sale was achieved or not. How can any potential investor do real due diligence without that information?

Symes audit will not show that

Symes auditor is not obliged to investigate client accounts so that won't show it

Wheres the proof of concept AZ???

2g your Google spam bs doesn't understand contradictions.

If company redacts information from an auditor using an NDA, is an auditor able to gain that information? No so all of what you've copy and pasted is once again irrelevant from the discussion

So now 2g is saying he gambled on this share, yet he called me nieve for taking a punt. The guys an idiotic hypocrite that can't answer a single question put to him. He's a distraction away from real discussion about the state of the company just like his buddy Hughes. Ignore.

What's happened 2g, have you gone shy? Have you got to update your chatgpt or it can't answer the question because the answer simply doesnt exist?

You're assuming WL IM means the deal was true sale rather than asset backed lending or traditional finance. SHOW US THE PROOF!

Syme's platform offering WL IM is simply a back-end software for hire, nothing like the golden ticket the majority of early investors were told we were buying into.

#backbase #temenos #finastra #finacle #bos #mambu #oracle #fis

Alans given the dropping of the true sale bs and simply selling the platform/software theirs nothing to suggest AZ couldn't make money. Its just simply lost its unique selling point (true sale) and has entered into a crowded market. Have a look at Versana backed by the big boys.

But as you rightly say, from where the business began to where it is now and the constant drivel trust in his morals could be the make the break of syme

Traditional, plain vanilla, finance, loan whatever you want to call it using a third parties platform.

Going off on another tangent here 2g.

Research core banking and then provide evidence to show previous deals are anything more than syme acting as a software/platform provider for a WL IM.

Until we get past this point, discussing anything else regarding the whole reason many people invested is pointless

Still can't answer my question...

I thought being the all knowledgeable you would've noticed that the special, worlds first, game changing 'true sale' term has been dropped from all the rns's and replaced with 'ad hoc', finance and broader 'white label IM'.

Theirs zero evidence to suggest that previous IM's were true sales rather than traditional Wl IM's simply using the syme platform as you've been here IMPLYING. Show us all the evidence and not the deals you previously posted that haven't happened.

I did not imply that in the slightest 😅. I didn't imply, I stated what was written in the RNS.

Banco opted to prioritise traditional financing over IM.

The rest is just more chatgpt garbage implying that IM is a workable legal model and not recharacterised loans. Once again, show me proof that previous IM's have passed scrutiny....

I stated banco maybe still interested in working with syme because of the automated platform or some other part of the intellectual properties the company holds that could benefit their plain vanilla financing.

I'm not having a third party conversation with your computer, discuss with your brain

Only 3 months late 2g (17th Dec 2024 RNS).

Syme offering the platform for plain vanilla financing (not true sale) because banco can't make IM pass scrutiny (not 'expanding' they don't have a choice).

Stop

##onconsignment #onbalancesheet

TA maybe it's something in the automated platform they like, crypto option... syme still has chances if someone onboard knows how to use the platform and doesn't just try to rewrite the rule book like AZ has been doing

In finance not 'true sale' .

Do show us all 2g, wheres the proof that previous IM's (not your make believe banco deal) have passed accounting and legal scrutiny...

What you're doing 2g is spamming anything you find on chatgpt and giving your own interpretation of it, which 9 times out of 10 is wrong (report button does include the option of 'false and/or misleading information' but it's quite fun watching you make a show daily).

#onconsignment

I'd bother to correct you but you obviously enjoy your little make belief world.

#bgmstillgetpaidiftheydontsignoff

Just Az and Jacob cleaning their money from trading syme and rtop

Research advice from the guy who didn't know symes model uses consignment 🤦‍♂️. What did you think the buy back mechanism was?

The latest claims you make regarding the only remaining points is also an assumption. Theirs been zero feedback from previous IM's to suggest they've past legal and accountancy scrutiny.

You've still not answered the originally question only copy and pasted definitions for some key terms.

So you're not denying syme is using consignment now? Make your mind up!

Your chatgpt isn't helping your cause mate, you still haven't answered how symes model gets around the contradiction in my original comment, if anything it's reinforced my point.

Recharacterisation

It's OK to not understand we're always learning but your arrogance and reliance on chatgpt to fight your corner is frankly pathetic