Member Info for bp82

Be anything Valju but this is not going ahead.
Plan something to block it. Enough is enough.
We all here have lost massive amount. Do not let these crooks off the hook easily.
I am firm on my decision.

is the amount I am ready to loose but I dont want to let these crooks carry on forever.
Until and unless they collectively put at least £100k+, do not pass any resolution.
KICK their ASS

nt there any legal professional among us who can take this up with appropriate authorities.

Lets draft a very strong worded letter to FCA, AIM. Collect all the RNSs and their interview video. They have been lying for the years.

Up for the game.
Lets cr8 a whatsapp grp. We cant be taken for a ride.
Until and unless these people commit to buy large holdings, do not approve anything.
We now need absolute information about the products, stages et. We have nothing much left to loose.
Let this come down to their credibility. Spread the word in the market about how inefficient this fking team is.

I did but not sure about this new and existing deferred shares. What is that?

So after consolidation, what will be the total rights.

someone please explain what my new 2.2m share will be like

will I be able to recover my money ::((

Until and unless they give a very clear picture with facts and figures, I think we should let this go burst now.
I don't want to live with this pain forever.
Its only them who are getting richer. Since last one, they have raked in £££ in salaries and want to keep doing this again.

https://www.lse.co.uk/rns/VAL/valirx-plc-val201-update--fsahbs3ysyi313u.html

https://www.lse.co.uk/rns/VAL/val201-update-7f72jssbq9aqxjk.html

At least £3b ;)

Some in fighting going on.

No money left. All spent on fine wines ;)

Just seen the emails, not sure what to make of it.

Gutted though. Had been following this for last 6 year, roughly £40k invested.
Not sure why they have to call admin when the only thing we are waiting for is 201 results.
They better stop taking salaries for few weeks until situation improves and hopefully all will be happy.

Why dont you put that email up on Twitter #Val.

We all can see.

Trading to incur losses. hahahaa

Hi Teamhanz, could you forward that to me too

bhanu12582 AT yahoo . com

Did anyone get a reply for all the emails that were sent since yesterday?

Founders: typically, founders create, develop and register IP rights (or other similar rights) before the incorporation of their company. They might, for instance, coin brand names, formulate algorithms, register domain names, develop the website, etc. Any IP created by the founder(s) prior to the incorporation of the company will be owned by the founders, not the company. Founders also tend not to enter into employment or consultancy agreements with the company for their services. As a consequence, IP developed by founders during the performance of their services after incorporation of the company will not ordinarily be owned by the company.

Employees: the basic rule is that the company will own the IP that its employees develop, provided it is created in the course of his/her employment. Exceptions exist, however, and employment agreements should always contain comprehensive provisions to ensure that IP is owned by the company.

Consultants (also known as independent contractors): unless there is a written contract in place that transfers ownership, the consultant will almost always own the IP that he/she/it creates. This is a very common issue and often requires the consultant to enter into a written contract to transfer ownership of the rights if such an agreement does not already exist.

So now the question is when was IP created and has GM been employed at that time.

Extract: Surprisingly and unexpectedly, the inventors have now demonstrated that targeting the SH3 domain of the tyrosine kinase, Src impairs the metastatic phenotype of fibrosarcoma and prostate cancer cells. The inventors have found that a peptide that binds to the SH3 domain of Src inhibits EGF-mediated processes known to be collectively involved in metastasis, such as DNA synthesis, motility and MMP secretion (see Example 1), and significantly reduces the incidence of lymph node metastases (see Example 2). Given that cell motility and MMP expression are known to be involved in metastasis (Jung et al, 2010; Cortes et al, 2008; Murray et al, 2012) the inventors believe that the effect will be apparent for other metastatic cancers also.

Nothing much, we are just bit more ****ed up ;)

https://www.proactiveinvestors.co.uk/companies/news/222823/valirx-secures-us-patent-for-val201-cancer-drug-222823.html

Where does it says that its been granted to GM