RE: Fool on the Hill twitter19 Jul 2018 12:12
Pengs ... now you.ve done it. Many here havent read the cpr (clearly) or if they have, arent noting the subtleties there ...although it.s there in black and white. SS.s recent rns had to be v positive, DL wheeled out too ... to make whatevers about to happen next look positive. More inconsistencies will emerge ... k3 v K4 ...linked ir not, rob Peter to pay Paul? An excellent post as usual, not your words but Xodus,s. Your analysis of the dry oil in the rns is spot on ... the water doesnt just vanish.