Member Info for BoomerBower

Clue, scientific and consensus are an oxymoron. Note you couldn't answer any of my points and just point at the propaganda. Futurology isn't science and the models have no better basis than Mark Carney's forecast models. Inferential statistics is not solid science as anyone who has ever looked at a human forecast knows. Keep your head in the sand and don't think, easier for you.

Yes neeboy just ignore the fact there is no experimental or any evidence for AGW in the geologic record. So let's just ignore the scientific method wholesale and cite climate ppl who claim to be scientists but ignore the fundamental principle of theorem/proof. We can talk about how accurate their forecasts have been if you like? Clue they have been terrible and totally over egged the change in temperature and sea level. And btw if you are citing a consensus that's a titally political term not a scientific one. Science is done by theorem proof not a show of hands by ppl on government pay roll. In short the climate will in time shows these idiots forecasts wrong (yet again).

Precisely nothing, and I suggest getting on with your life and not feeling guilty. It makes no difference where your energy comes from be it from a solar panel or from hydro carbons which are just stored sun energy. Planet earth couldn't give a toss one way or the other. I would suggest looking at the geologic temperature record, noting we are in a cool phase and you'll be reassured that AGW is total climate alarmism backed up by dubious and over fitted statistical models, not backed by either experimentation or geologic evidence.

Hi I'm in Lloyd's yes. Tbh I just hold and accumulate at these prices. My Lloyd's holding is probably too large but I've just been accumulating post crisis.

Peter you are having a laugh if you think we are having tropical winters here on in. The next most likely and problematic climate event is a glaciation. I know you skipped geology class but we've actually been in an ice age for the last 2.6m years which has been deepening. The sheer ignorance of ppl to believe computer generated nonsense over geologic evidence never ceases to amaze me! I am literally staggered ppl think the earth is in a warm phase on a geologic timescale it's one of the coolest periods.

On clay it's a certainty Rafa wins. On a HC fed has a slight edge. On grass I think it's 50/50 really and depends how hard their route through has been. Hoping Rafa is in Novak's half lol.

It was great hairy times Vs Tsonga and Agut. I did speak to his coach Severin who I saw out for a run, he told me Roger was physically in great shape and very much in Halle for the win to get the number 2 seed at Wimbledon. At the end of the day I'm not sure jumbling the rankings is right but in the other hand Im not complaining as a Federer fan.

No yours is the wrong attitude. You are making us all poorer on this ridiculous Co2 strawman. The 20bn we waste subsidising the "green Revolution" would be better spent either helping the poor or researching nuclear fusion. Lining the pockets of rich land owners to stick inefficient windmills and solar panels is just a new varient on set aside, it's far worse than the poll tax. I know if you have a VlBA in whatever you probably believe the world about to boil, most physicists think the AGW theorists are actually laughable as they lack experimental evidence or any evidence in the geologic record for their absurd claims.

Let's not forget the vineyards across england in Roman times too Bruce, that achieved without industrial means as well. Climate was warmer then too. The Romans seemed ok with it, bet crowds were better at the circus maximus on hot days.

Not really Erv you must have been doing staggering mileage if it wasn't as much as your air miles.

Newboy you are flying. Therefore if you truly believe your own insistence on this carbon nonsense you are not doing your bit at all. Anyone who spouts climate change and then gets in a plane is a hypocrite. If it was such a threat why board the plane?

Onlyif the climate will be just fine with or without us. Sheer hubris to believe we control it.

TFE if you look at the science you will quickly realise co2 isn't a problem at all. In fact life on earth will probably perish because of the lack of it. All fossil fuels are is stored sunlight. We are therefore perfectly mad to buy this absurd AGW theory and take ourselves backwards.

Co2 is plant food. Therefore producing that has increased the duration that life on earth can be sustained by about 50/60m years. Co2 is sequestered in rocks such as lime stone over time which will mean life on earth dies out eventually. Current co2 is around 420ppm, was 15 times HIGHER when complex life on earth evolved during Cambrian explosion. If it falls below 160 /ppm all plant life and animal life dies. Co2 is a very good thing, without it we all die. If you believe it spells our doom you are very stupid and easily fooled.

Erm since you are clearly JB get a life and last time I checked brexit hasn't concluded clown.

How many BBs can lti get in one post?

Bruce you are entirely correct on Carnage. He truly is a village idiot if one pays any regard to his predictions.

Probably after dilution it's more like 9% lti but I take your point.

Poker serious question but when did either the BoE, Guardian or BBC ever predict anything correctly? Take the opposite position to them by default and without thinking it's the correct one 99 times out of 100.

MrsN you are absolutely proof you have a terrible system north of the wall!