Member Info for boldboy

I have to draw the line at this idea when those elderly Brits dashed off to the sunny climes of Europe do you think for one moment they cared what was going to happen to me in the future ,they did what they were doing for selfish reasons and that is why we have a selfish society .
There plight is of their own making and to that end they are condemned.

Looking at the ex brexit negotiator on the politics show and the mealy mouthed answers to the questions that were put to him sums up why the negotiations ended up in Mays lap.
This individual who says one thing and obviously means another must have drove the EU negotiators round the bend with his two faced non answers to their questions back when he was working with Davies.
He his obviously of low credibility both as an MP and as a man because someone who rubbishes other peoples opinions and ideas at every turn is lacking in moral fibre .The way he dogged the MP for Liverpool was disgraceful regardless of her idea being unworkable.
This episode clearly shows the type of MP that is vying to run the agenda from henceforth in the Conservative party with threats of 48 letters and in some ways its just as frightening as the Labour scenario.

The whole point of the referendum was to ask the people to vote on weather they wanted to be in the EU or not.
The people voted to be out END OF DEBATE .
Why these remainers in Parliament continually go on is contradicting the democracy we use to in this country and to that end they should all resign as they are opposing the very system they signed up for.
We have in our grasp the opportunity to escape the dictatorial regime that calls itself a union but if the spineless corps of objectors have thier way the future for everyone in the UK is bleak.

Did you buy? as there may be more downside to come if May goes walkies.

Yes they are sitting there with no credible solution to the Brexit dilemna the PM as got, but say they will or won't depending on this or that when in actual fact they are using the Brexit issue to force a general election and could'nt care less about the so called six tests which they knew from announcing them could never be passed.
My question is ,why does everybody think we were going to exit the EU and everything stay the same,common sense tells you if you are not in the club you cannot have the goodies the club offers and what we have got out of the deal is more than the EU wanted to give us initially.
To comment that what the PM as attained is not what the British People voted for is a misnomer ,nobody knew what we would get but it certainly was'nt going to be a status quo.
The main thing we are not doing is paying into something we don't get a equitable return on ,we control our borders and we have the right to go outside the EU trading paremeters worldwide at the same time trading with the EU something the EU member states don't have as individuals.
It is now crunch time and the pontificating and banner waving from individual nations within the UK as to stop because the alternative to what is on offer is a chasm of uncertainty for the future generations.

The BBC as a lot to answer for in its coverage of the Brexit drama from start to finish that, kelpie Laura Kussenburg with the sideways slit gob who thinks she needs to dramatise every report with inuendo's and what if's instead of just reporting the facts, send her to outer mongolia to report on the yak population for the duration.
Norman Smith is not much better with his contributions and the idiots they showcase on the lunchtime politics show should not be let out of the house without a chaperon .

The argument against paying staff and senior management as a favourable shine in that the shares given to members of staff within a company usually have a restrictive sale envelope, in some cases years so these shares are not entering the market for some time after they are issued.

Dream on ,there is only one outcome ,if you need a perfect example of the future take a look at Sears in the states they are the beginning and end historically of the department store model.

I have a friend in Florida who lost over a Million dollars back in the noughties doing that spread betting and he had three monitors in he's den using three different companies to give him their daily recommendations, some days he won and some days he lost but he was totally addicted and thought my way of working the stock market (buy low sell high) was too slow.
He's not doing it any more he now uses my approach .

The Labour party as let the biggest militant they ever had as a member to rejoin after being thrown out by the exec in the 80s and the rumor is he is going to conduct the brexit talks for Labour that means running around in Taxis sharing out the divi we get, to those that were not around when this idiot was running the Council in Liverpool read wiki.
It now shows how the Labour party as degenerated back to those 80s and the bloody chaos that emerged because of this clown's antics,God help us should they win the popular vote.

Not just illiterate but very Marxist ,Really as the brains of a rocking horse and probably thought this one up whilst sat on one whilst watching that other complete idiot DA committing herself to nothing whilst revealing everything.

This constant if, but, and why, is just not what the brits voted for in the referendum and this common market approach to staying in touch whilst being divorced will create friction and mayhem for decades to come and reduce our negotiating powers elsewhere in the world.
My solution is to break completely and go back to pre joining status that way we all know the score,it will be as it was before Heath took us in against Deguale's wishes and we can get on with a completely new order .
please don't reply with alll the if buts and whys they don't exist ,just go with a clean break.

This drams turned into a daily soap with the same boring characters and commentators as to a great degree undermined the faith of the general public in politicians and their Eu counterparts ,which if it was possible to get any lower is a reinforcement of the argument for leaving.
The dictatorial attitude of the big two within the cartel that sits on the top table in the ivory tower as more than proved why the British people have decided to leave.To that end lets get on with it and head for the door no fond farewells no leaving presents no happy wave of good bye , just bloody leave.

This kind of glowing report as been spun out of this company's activities for years and the shares have been stuck in this position for the same amount of time.
I made a lot from this companies share increase when it was less than 12p and called YJ Lovell and sold out at 220p years later when it was renamed to its present title after the Montpellier name was dropped after the Animal rights attack on the company shareholders and employees because of the Cambridge lab contract.
I at that time of selling thought they had reached their zenith but have been proved wrong as they at one time reached 500p.
Things were different then and the group was virtually debt free it was also very reliant on income from its nuclear clean up activities which in scale are less lucrative because of overall contract reviews at Sellafield by the government auditing department.
The expansion into rail was at its inception with privatisation of the industry the catalyst was a good move but there are clouds on the horizon with the recently announced review of the system ,and the perception that it will be run by its employees on a John Lewis model.
That spells danger for outsource companies, new broom sweeps cleans, self contained staffing and in house engineering terms spring forth and the overall long term picture looks very unrosy.
I think its water infastructure services are well established and will continue to produce an income albiet dictated by the marketplace competition, and there are a lot of them. the new venture into telecoms as been less than trailblazing and the foray into gas network renewal installation a failed write off.
To summarize I think I sold out to early but those holding stock today that is showing profits need to re asses Renew.

Totally agree with the former poster ,The show as deteriorated into a loose women format with people talking over one another and Joe having little control over the participants,This type of format is very adversary in context and leads to confusing output and with mismatched participants both in intellect and experience on diverse subjects is non subjective and leads to disparity in substance output.
I don't see a future for this format and expect its demise in short order.

It as already been touched upon by a fellow poster and I would add further damning info on electric cars the battery contents are a finite resource and at this moment in time cannot be synthetically produced .China as cornered the global output of this raw material which is as I have said in a limited quantity compared to carbon fuels,the processing of the raw material to battery usage is in percentage terms the full life usage of a combustion engine pollution content.
Add to that the disposable pollution content of the dead battery and you have a negative input of green credentials.
I will not try to add the environmental cost of hundreds of thousands of charging points and the pollution created in production and installation of same.
There are alternatives to electric and one is hydrogen which in pollution terms comes out way ahead of the rest but not enough R&D is being invested in this duel and its application .

The Debenhams directors have overseen a failing business model and as the saying goes you can't polish a turd,The end is nigh and as John Laurie said "we are doooomed".

This article is a speculative load of tosh with no credible data that supports the forecast of doom and gloom these so called financial experts sit on the toilet view contents of the bowl and then the extrapolate that into meaningless text just to prove their existence.
The world that Lloyds operates in dictates its operations and to that end it is doing OK .

Mick-B As history shows size is not the key in this opening doors synergy it is about best use of the business model for both companies and they will benefit in the market gaining a larger customer base in one fell swoop couple that with investable cash surplus and they are as a team very formidable .

There was someone suggesting this week that Lloyds were vunerable to a take over because of the low SP, according to a Sunday Times article last week it is rumored in the square mile that Lloyds are sniffing around the PRU and it won't be the first time Lloyds have tried to tie up with a big insurer.
I think it is a good move and would benefit both companies in a number of synergies and wealth building it would also make Lloyds less of a takeover target .