Member Info for bogyo

If the production delays were out of SEE's control, then Magna should at least extend the repayment timeline in line with the delay. Otherwise, it’s just a one sided deal where Magna gets its money back regardless of delays, while SEE took all the risk.

And we are also still linked doing exactly what Magna SP does.

$60mil to pay back in 2 years is 2billion shares at today's prices.

The damage has been done the past months, not today. And that is down to the past 12 months revealed only after they were shown on the results. Yes it is over and they are looking ahead, some knew, some didn't.

I don’t see why Magna aren’t taking any responsibility for a shared collaboration that’s rolling out late when we should have been pumping revenues from it since early 2024, after spending money on their dev. Magna gets back all the money they put into, while SEE took all the risk. Great deal indeed, for Magna. 11p was completely irrelevant blinders.

I consider this a positive ending of a crash if they can improve from here, and a buy to reverse.

Remember, the market crashes the fool and leaves the overly cautious behind. The fool are now crashed.

These IIs act like a bunch of overleveraged traders desperate for any cash. I wanted a better daily candle, now here it is, printing the divergence.

I'll stand outside at 8pm tonight and clap for the reversal of this weekly.

The CFO money is still flowing. Just get Martin back on his trading app.

Yeah, not sure why anyone would be so desperate to offload at this low level. It is clear they were waiting for a dump on any news, but it didn’t even push it up enough for liquidity. Just balancing out the daily moves. Hopefully weekly should reverse back. imo a buy, the deeper it goes the bigger.

I thought this became obvious last Thursday. I can never underestimate retail expectations.

Significant insider buying is always a positive sign, this is not even a question. Insiders might sell their shares for various reasons, but they buy them for only one: they believe the price will go up. I don’t doubt that they believe in their company.

But it is not a justification for investing. CFOs and CEOs can be wrong about their own stock.

Stock prices aren’t just about company fundamentals, they also reflect market sentiment, macro, investor behavior, liquidity, and timing.

I don’t focus too much on when he buys to dca since he can’t time it freely or privately, but I think he got this last one very right. It’s a surprise nobody followed though.

I was actually buying since Friday on that weekly close. The daily is rubbish but the weekly has a chance to reverse this week, and you can not ignore a high double % move from here wherever it ends. I don’t expect anything material now, but hopefully, they’ll bring in some liquidity from the great city of London.

Just a joke, since you obviously missed that deeply subliminal factual message that only small PIs were selling.

It’s fine, probably no one is laughing. We’ve reached the point where everyone is blindly factual to their own position.

What we need is a good comparison to Tobii now.

Still can't read titles, can you?

Glad you finally got that off your chest, mate.

Well, if the goal is to attract illiterate investors who can’t read beyond a title or interpret accounts, because obviously, that’s exactly what this share needs right now, you wouldn’t put all that into a title. For the most balanced view here.

Matml, it doesn't make me feel better and my feelings or yours are irrelevant, it’s a fact: they sold.

ffs, of course, it’s great they’re still holding, but that’s nowhere the point of the news this week. The last I checked, adding at 11p and selling all the way down to 2p over 4 years time is nowhere a positive outcome. I do not speculate why they did it, because it is irrelevant. It won't make me feel better if they say reorganising the portfolio or different direction. Money and actions don't lie. If they don't see money in it they sell.

First of all, when I dare to challenge a positive spin on a negative news it doesn’t mean I am all negative. I post it as I see it. If it is negative, complain to the RNS board maybe it is just negative. If you want to label me a troll to make you feel better, please. I am happy for that. I am also a trader if you want to use that.

Federated reported already after the dilution, and it wasn’t even that long ago. "Go check". So very little factual info you had there on a 7% of their holding sold. When they report another sell in a month, well they are selling. It doesn’t scream holding, or confidence to me.

And if you haven’t been paying attention, selling 22mils is an issue but isn’t the main issue at this level. The same issue that likely prevents Federated to sell more. When I see demand, I promise I’ll turn all cheery and comfort you.

No, selling isn’t a show of confidence. Buying is showing of confidence. And only one of those is happening. The once biggest IIs, who know more than any of you, were happy to dilute and sell even at these prices. Good luck spinning that.

I’d rather hear someone explain why they’re still not buying under 2p, than those who blame the pesky MMs and PI fear who set their SL at 2p. Of course it is a great excuse for tanking, but who actually does that? What PIs are actually placing SL near a once in a lifetime crash event pandemic low, instead of placing buy orders there? Rather than protecting your money and place it under your average like 5p or 6p, or just fck it all and hope for next year if you are down 80-90% already.

200M shares in 4 weeks is significant. You can justify your case with opinions, but the fact, red close without any sign of demand on heavy volume can’t be ignored.

I ran through the largest volume day, and majority of the trades were II algos. no need to check every day, until the selling is exhausted and prints a reversal, this will continue.

They drip-feed shares over time, along an avg or in time-increments, split them in multiples, Keeping the selling pressure less obvious and hidden, apparently it works.

Yes, we’re at a historical low and likely will make great money on the next pump, how low this ends will change however where it could go in the next long run.

They split it, repeat, and adjust in small increments to make it seem insignificant. This isn’t a one-day thing algo trading continues rejecting on the 15min.

PIs don’t trade like this on no news days, they’re just waiting and hoping for the next big contract to drop at any moment. Apart from occasional SLs hit in but I doubt many actually have these.

These aren’t PI trades, and they’re happy to take the loss at this price. The biggest concern is still the lack of demand. You can query the justification for both. Until that changes, this keeps going.

A stock is worth exactly what someone is willing to pay for it, no more, no less.

If it stays low for an extended period and no buyers step in, then that’s simply where the market values it, whether it’s objectively cheap or not, downplayed or not.

If you’re blaming AIM for the valuation, which I’ve done myself for different reasons, then the real question is again and again why they’re still on AIM.

Making money is again a different question on different timescales.