Member Info for BobsSocks

https://twitter.com/DeviceAuthority/status/1601203569025290242
https://t.co/s2oUX3YR1U

Expands to,

https://hubs.ly/Q01pqX4H?utm_content=231116046&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter&hss_channel=tw-526627085

"We could not determine which URL you were trying to go to. Please check to make sure your URL is not truncated."

This from a company that is the Spark Quadrant Leader in Identity & Access Management.

How on earth, as a leader in Identity & *Access* Management, do you publish stuff without checking that the link *Access* to your, tired old and payed for, boast works?

The above tweet was posted at 1:19pm today. It is now 4:57pm

If I were coding for DA I would be going totally ballistic at the coloured crayon people. I bust my heart out on security in order to make sure that what I deliver gives the right people the right certificates at scale and some suit in a Vectra that stinks of aftershave can't be bothered to make their OTE target?

Maybe it is too much to ask but when you launch a rocket people get to see it soar off into space. If I were to be launching a product then, irrespective of the possibility of disclosing market penetration metrics, prior to the launch I would have set out the background to the launch and the parameters I would use to validate the launch as being successful.

"We will be launching the service with two operational satellites covering sensors at locations in Brazil, America and India. We expect to hit 1% of localized area capacity with 99% single pass data capture and 99.999% two pass data capture. This will validate our expectations of the performance of the system in respect of sensor to satellite time synchronization in compliance with the Lorawan standard as permitted on the free to use ISM, Industrial, Scientific, Medical, spectrum."

"We have launched the system and achieved 0.99999999% of localized area capacity with 100% single pass data capture. A cow dropped a pat on one of the sensors. Otherwise the system has been validated."

Other use cases here...

https://resources.lora-alliance.org/use-case-2

should you wish to go crazy and find out it is apparently only Wyld that it satellite based and shout that Wyld now owns all the satellites.

Spotted on T-Gram by Andrbea.

Of course I just Lurve to give Links so with a bit of search engine fu...

https://resources.lora-alliance.org/use-case-2/wyld-networks-use-case-leo-satellite-2

PDF available on page but may be a session link.

Probably meaningless but run the numbers...

https://wyldnetworks.com/press-releases?release=0DC0922ADAF52C6F

SEK 760K = $73,592

$73,592/12 months is $6,133 a month which at $5 per sensor works out as about 1,200 sensors which at $40 a pop is $48,000

Otherwise how close would 1,200 sensors be to fulfilling the total requirements of IMAE. In other words is there room for expansion?

Orgasm rampy spin time for Mr Still Waiting.

https://twitter.com/matthew_d_green/status/1600567604015497216
https://twitter.com/matthew_d_green/status/1600572941275643995

"Finally, Apple has made a bunch of nice improvements around account access — including providing support for FIDO MFA devices and other things that enterprises in particular will really like."

Before blowing your load please understand that FIDO is an Open Source standard and Apple will be quite capable of implementing it for themselves.

But, But, But, But, But, But, But, But, But...

DA now owns all the Apple.

OK, maybe premature, but I would be interested in some indication of how the launch went, is going.

Doubtful. If they are an FCA regulated II then I would have thought that they are required to publish regular, quarterly, accounts of amounts invested in their split of funds. The information would become available one way or the other.

https://smartmaritimenetwork.com/2021/09/28/eutelsat-to-test-wyld-networks-leo-satellite-iot-terminals/

"The ELO **nanosatellite** constellation consists of a series of four initial satellites from Loft Orbital (ELO 1 and 2) and Clyde Space (ELO 3 and 4), expected to launch later in 2021 or in 2022. An ELO Alpha test satellite was already launched in April of this year to confirm the technical performance of the system."

That's it.

Wyld will be piggy backing nano-satellites on other company launches because they have proved that the system they are offering does what it says on the tin and those companies see the value, profit for themselves, in that offering.

Still Waiting is a putative ramper who writes on ADVFN in the same way they would draw their promise of something special on the wall of a toilet stall in the expectation you would be fooled that they can deliver an 8K UHD version of their scribblings.

Still Waiting is Still Fixated on Pron delivery.

"Can you imagine Elon presenting a platform that does 100% data coverage !!"

"I suppose he’ll be too busy watching this tomorrow.

https://www.capacitymedia.com/article/2azfrbbem9ikjiuhco54w/news/spacex-to-launch-40-satellites-for-oneweb-rival-on-thursday "

Wyld does not transmit or receive 8K UHD Pron videos on demand.

OK. Might be rubbish but I got a pun in.

If Williamson wishes to give some insight into the launch and how it is going why not set up a publicly accessible network dashboard page showing the operational metrics. Satellites Online, Data Flow, Cumulative Data Volume, Network Issues and so on.

Nothing that identifies the actual customers, specific data or anything of commercial value to those customers.

Then their investors, established and prospective, can see the ching ching coming into the company coffers.

Hi Andrbea,

I'm not suggesting that posting the links is subversive. You may have noticed that I like it where people post links to relevant information both in terms of information and in order to support their claims.

My concern is that when you lift a link sent by the company to your personal e-mail address and leave in all the additional tracking data it is possible that you, as Andrbea on ADVFN, will be identified as being, for example,

jenny.jones @ btopenworld.com

Check the difference between the links I posted and the ones you posted.

In respect of slating Sisto or misogyny directed at Payne I do not recall if you have done so but if you were to do so then posting raw links with the tracking data included will identify you to the company and, should you use the same e-mail address to communicate with the company, they may choose to ignore any reasonable questions you may ask them.

There are a number of posters on ADVFN who regularly claim to have sent e-mails to the company and suggest they have received no response. It is possible that their requests were just silly noise but it is also possible that they have been ignored because they spout silly noise on bulletin boards.

Sanitise your links.

https://www.deviceauthority.com/events/2022-internet2-technology-exchange-denver-5th-9th-december-2022/
https://www.deviceauthority.com/events/dodiis-worldwide-san-antonio-12th-15th-december-2022/

There is no need to publish anything beyond the slash prior to ?utm especially when it mentions an e-mail campaign and likely comes with a unique identifier.

Imagine the scenario where you regularly publish other messages to ADVFN, such as those above but including the identifiers, that rubbish Sisto and other company members and, as a result, expose yourself as being a subversive. I assume you have not practiced misogyny.

Once again in as much as I fail to understand why people who invest in a company that invests in a company whose role is identity security, AKA IAM, manage to fail so miserably at the basics themselves I also fail to understand why Device Authority repeatedly insists on hiding their technology, or lack thereof, behind a sales wall and a plethora of tracking devices.

I can only, unreasonably, assume that their solutions are not application/situation agnostic and need to be tailored to a customers needs so you are forced to accept a cold call from a sales rep who will assure you that they have a software engineer who hates them for all the previous asks that can roll you a PIC1897 solution over the weekend.

https://youtu.be/_RlSD8sNzMk

I shall now make some rubbish up.

Allistair mentions that geostationary orbits, always on connection, are at 36,000Km. He also mentions that Wyld LEO satellite[s] orbit at 700Km.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geostationary_orbit
https://keisan.casio.com/exec/system/1224665242

I would trust Casio.

The calculator suggests that the orbital period is about 1Hr and 40Minutes.

Then you get to stick your thinking hat on and wonder why this is good for a, low bandwidth, system like Lorawan.

There are serious constraints placed on transmit time and time slices within the available license free bandwidths.

However if a sensor is only collecting and storing minimal data over a, for example, 24 hour, period then seeing a satellite once will be enough to burst offload such a minimal payload.

Based on the above mumble a 'sensor' will see a satellite every 1Hr 40Minutes but it wont. You also have to consider the Ground Track of the satellite,

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ground_track

Basically within a 24 hour period our LEO satellite will make 12 orbits with each orbit covering 30 degrees of the Earths surface hoovering up sensor data as it goes along and this fits in with the transmit/slice time available from Lorawan as long as you mediate between the sensors and the satellite.

It's not exactly 100% but it is close.

It may be the case that Lorawan or its standard is or could be made adaptive.

Given Wyld is going to be covering sp****ly populated, in terms of people and sensors, areas the amount of data collected per pass may be subject to relaxation of the protocol, again subject to proper mediation, to get more throughput without incurring interference penalties.

To end my burble.

The failing patent does not matter. If my stupid blither is correct and Wyld are first to market with an implementation that aligns with my stupids and the backup from their partners then that is or should be exceptionally encouraging.

Question from Blackbear over on ADVFN

"Why is the patent still pending."

My opinion is that the patent is doomed to fail however Allistair has placed himself on the right side of legal by now claiming it is pending. Claiming patent rights when you have none is a criminal offence in the UK,

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/manual-of-patent-practice-mopp/section-110-unauthorised-claim-of-patent-rights

The same likely applies in other jurisdictions and, I assume, would be frowned upon by financial authorities especially for a listed company.

Of course claiming Patent Pending when the patent looks like it is doomed is still fluff but that is permitted but once again my view is that the honesty displayed by making that admission engenders a level of trust and beyond that an indication of the level of confidence Allistair and the company now has in their future prospects.

https://youtu.be/_RlSD8sNzMk
https://youtu.be/_RlSD8sNzMk?t=705

Now the description is Patent Pending as opposed to Patent Secured.

FWIIW, given I am just some anonymous drongo on a BB, that was an impressive delivery of what, at face value, appears to be an impressive product made so much better by that added piece of honesty.

I hope it is indicative of a new sense of confidence that Wyld is now positioned or soon to be established as a player in their market if not the leader.

I am surprised that DA have not also 'partnered' with and therefore now own Microchip,

https://ww1.microchip.com/downloads/aemDocuments/documents/SCBU/ProductDocuments/DataSheets/ATECC608B-TNGTLS-CryptoAuthentication-Data-Sheet-DS40002250A.pdf

As per Still Waiting I thought their stuff was agnostic.

According to the Kool Aid drinkers on ADVFN DA now own all the ST Microelectronics.

https://www.st.com/content/st_com/en/search.html#q=%22Device%20Authority%22-t=keywords-page=1
https://www.st.com/content/st_com/en/partner/partner-program/partnerpage/Device-Authority.html#partner-products
https://www.st.com/en/secure-mcus/stsafe-a110.html
https://www.st.com/en/microcontrollers-microprocessors/stm32-32-bit-arm-cortex-mcus.html

https://www.st.com/resource/en/datasheet/stsafe-a110.pdf

So DA have coded on an STM-32 to interface with a STSAFE-A110 and ST have certified the solution.

It's another ESP not very much burger.

That's all folks.

£1.5 million over five years is a nothing burger. Someone else might care to tell me how much has been invested into DA over the last five years by Tern and other parties but I doubt the result has been a profit.

Again the words from Soma Land over on ADVFN have flagged this as being a legacy deal. It is a diminishing market and DA will be left competing for share with others as legacy product is placed into retirement.

They may be capable of doing so but without any meaningful protection on or uptake of their product they are on the sideline integrating other people's technologies into their offerings based on how well they design their DashBoard.

It's the, ADVFN shouty shouty, ESP conundrum.

https://www.epsprogramming.com/security/device-authority

"For EPS customers looking for end-to-end protection of their IoT devices,
applications and data in the field, we recommend Device Authority."

https://www.epsprogramming.com/security/crypto-quantique

"For EPS customers looking for end-to-end protection of their IoT devices,
applications and data in the field, we recommend Crypto Quantique."

As an aside I note we still have the usual ongoing paid, shorter, ex-employee, competitor meme in place from those who appear to be incapable of arguing for a bright future beyond meaningless blither such as,

"Looking forward to the inevitable upwards re-rate as news flows in over the next few weeks demonstrating the background hockey stick growth that has not been revealed due to imposed NDA's and product whitelisting. Market Makers, Shorters and Paid Posters will be burned. GLA."

Being a glass 99/100ths empty sort of person £1.2 Million over five years is £240K a year. Guess at a, low, tech type person wage of £40K a year and you have employed four people.

Meanwhile, over in Fantasy ADVFN land, the usual suspects are harping on about these contracts being directed to retrofit old hat with the suspicion that old hat still has some meaningful life in it.

From my perspective it looks like old hat, DA's Unique Selling Point, USP, "Use us or do nothing" proposition, has been placed on end of life support with four nurses.

I'll go further and suggest that DA can do this not because they have a patent on it but because no-one else is interested in supporting soon to be dead things.