Member Info for BobsSocks

Https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2011-title47-vol2/pdf/CFR-2011-title47-vol2-sec25-164.pdf

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2011-title47-vol2/pdf/CFR-2011-title47-vol2-sec25-165.pdf

Special offer. $1 million off,

"(d) A GSO licensee will be permitted to reduce the amount of the bond by $750,000 upon successfully meeting a milestone deadline set forth in section 25.164(a) of this chapter. An NGSO licensee will be permitted to reduce the amount of the bond by $1 million upon successfully meeting a milestone deadline set forth in section 25.164(b) of this chapter."

See 47 CFR §§ 25.164(b)(1) and (f) and 25.165(d)

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2011-title47-vol2/pdf/CFR-2011-title47-vol2-sec25-164.pdf

25.164: Milestones.

25.165: Posting of bonds.

"(1) NGSO licensees are required to post a bond in the amount of $5 million."

NGSO = Non-Geostationary.

Hang on. Didn't Wyld just raise SEK 32.3 million? That sounds a bit close to 60% of $5 million

Has Wyld ponied up part of the Bond to get a bunch of satellites into orbit?

Https://www.startpage.com/do/dsearch?query=Swarm+Technologies+site%3Afcc.gov

"PUBLIC NOTICE - Federal Communications Commission

30 Aug 2023 ... S3041. SAT-LOA-20181221-00094. Swarm Technologies, Inc. The Satellite Programs and Policy Division has determined that Swarm Technologies, Inc."

https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-23-803A1.pdf

"SAT-LOA-20181221-00094 S3041 Swarm Technologies, Inc.

The Satellite Programs and Policy Division has determined that Swarm Technologies, Inc. has met the launch and begin operations milestone set forth in its grant of authority to construct, deploy, and operate a constellation of up to 150 non-geostationary orbit space stations (Call Sign S3041), and may release the bond associated with this authorization. See 47 CFR §§ 25.164(b)(1) and (f) and 25.165(d)."

Just a moment. Swarm are moving operations to Starlink on 5G whilst abandoning their LEO-IOT offering but they are going to launch 150 more satellites. Who is going to be using them?

Thanks for the partial clarification.

BTW Not my numbers. Dave's.

It is or seems to be an even sweeter deal.

... more than likely wrong

"It is much better value to buy the actual shares!

At 4SEK per BTU you are actually paying 2 SEK for each warrant but then have to pay an additional 14.24SEK for T04 take up and another 16.61SEK for T05 take up as opposed to 8SEK/share!"

Someone else needs to check Dave's sums and my, more than likely, interpretation of them.

Now previously I got the impression that in order to bale out Wyld from their cash shortfall. I am calling it that. In my mind there was a major back order disruption when they linked up with SpaceX because, again my view, they had to re-roll their product prior to shunting it out of the door.

Mr Swann, our mysterious benefactor, and the other two got a sweet deal in order to pony up the initial cash to bankroll that one. 4SEK per share on the present share price of about 8SEK according to Dave's sums. However, and they may be playing Catholics given they have the opportunity pull out, when it comes to the warrants, again according to Dave's sums if they do take them then they get backended at 30SEK for a total of 34SEK per share.

Now, obviously.

Mr Swann, and the other two are going to be insiders so they will know more than us proles and as suggested if they do not proceed with the warrants they will still possibly end up with 'free' money so, for them, why not take a punt?

I would like to think that despite it being a dog eat dog World if you pull a stunt like this your reputation would be permanently flushed down the toilet.

Now we know Mr Swann has had previous with Tern. During the end of 2022 he ended up with 5% of the company. We also saw the SP rise during and just after that time. Then, because this is Tern, it dribbled back down to the doldrums. Now, either Mr Swann is a smart investor with a lot of spare cash or.... something else.

We get the same with his latest punt, CHLL, Chill Brands. Mr Swann snaffles 10% of the company mid April this year. The SP takes a rise and then goes silly before dribbling back down into the doldrums. Again Mr Swann is a smart investor with a lot of spare cash or.... something else.

BTW this is all my opinion but based on the above I would be inclined to take a view that Mr Swann is not really that smart. He just has a lot of spare cash. Let's hope Mr Williamson cares more about his own reputation.

Also....

https://www.startpage.com/do/dsearch?query=starlink+mesh+network

Although apparently this was launched back in 2022 and MESH networking is a well known thing those looking for a bigger ramp will probably drool over the broader public market penetration.

Just to idly expand on that one.

https://wccftech.com/spacexs-laser-starlink-sats-will-be-used-by-astronauts-flying-in-space/

https://hackaday.com/2019/05/20/everything-we-know-about-spacexs-starlink-network/

In the comments...

"3) Inter-satellite laser links have been used in other constellations in the past. The trick here will be a ***custom MANET routing protocol***, in order to point and re-point the lasers, that doesn’t overwhelm the bandwidth with routing overhead. That is also amazing technology."

More on Satellite MANET...

https://www.startpage.com/do/dsearch?query=satellite+MANET

Mr Williamson really has not given much away as to what Wyld and SpaceX are collaborating on other than differentiating between SpaceX being a broadband play whilst Wyld is strictly IOT. However one thing that has cropped up in a couple of his most recent presentations is inter-satellite communications...

NASA’s Starling Satellites Will Work With SpaceX Starlink To Test Collision Avoidance

https://wccftech.com/nasas-starling-satellites-will-work-with-spacex-starlink-to-test-collision-avoidance/

Ramish Zafar•Jul 12, 2023 10:46 AM EDT

"For the maneuvering, the spacecraft will use NASA's ROMEO (Reconfiguration and Orbit Maintenance Experiments Onboard) software which will allow the Starling spacecraft to plan their trajectories and make the required adjustments. ***The communications bit will be made up a of Mobile Ad-hoc Network (MANET) network that uses radios on each satellite to determine when they are in range to create a communications network***. This will test technology to see how effectively the satellites can deploy a network in space by themselves and then communicate through it."

Now we know Wyld has some previous in setting up mobile MESH networks...

https://wyldnetworks.com/blog/what-is-mesh-networking

linked to from...

https://wyldnetworks.com/blog/connectivity-in-smart-buildings

where we find...

"However, advances in wireless communications and mobile devices have transformed the scale and robustness of mesh networks. ***Mobile ad hoc networks – MANETS –*** take advantage of the smartphones that almost everyone now carries around with them. Each mobile device becomes part of the mesh, acting like a router and creating a vast interlaced network with no single point of failure. Furthermore, this network carries on working even when mobile telecommunications or the internet are down."

Possibly Mr Williamson is keeping his cards close to his chest because such an application, whilst representing a possible collaboration with SpaceX, is not the money-spinner everyone is hoping for. It is however more in tune with his recent words.

I do wish you would stop talking about your marital affairs.

I thing some Big Bang theorists might take issue with that one.

"I’m not sure Bob! You can apply planks law to VAST?"

Well, planks probably. I'm sure they use them a lot in mining for getting the wheelbarrows into the skips.

Mr Planck maybe not so much but then you would be doing it wrong.

Understood. It can become a bit confusing when you have to use a Lorentz Transform. If you don't cancel terms correctly then you can end up proving nothing equals nothing and, as yet, no mathematician has proved that one.

Depends on whether you use h or h-bar.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck_constant#Reduced_Planck_constant

Quality stuff there. For those who do not know what Occam's razor is or how it should be applied the general acceptance for ramping soothsayers is to mention it as being the obvious choice and then write a lengthy post that defines their obvious choice which will then be accepted by those of lesser intelligence as being the outcome.

Wiser people will by nature see that the analysis is by its nature totally flawed and choose to solve The Company Hamiltonian. A robust tool used in modern day physics to determine most likely outcomes as opposed to some rune reading thought up by an English bloke in the 14th century long before the safety razor was invented by Elon Musk.

Can't find them. Are they another crash and burn Oily like VAST?

Quality ramp there. Got any crypto recommendations?

Out of date.

Ignores the revelation from Williamson that Wyld is now Satellite operator as opposed to being a Virtual Satellite Operator.

Previously,

https://youtu.be/r7_aKfHdBVI?t=192

Now,

https://youtu.be/WHcUc-cMmEE?t=39

https://youtu.be/WHcUc-cMmEE?t=215

Do try to keep up. Tern has a holding in Talking Medicines. Talking Medicines uses a propriety version of ChatGPT to run their superwhizz AI play. ChatGPT is subject to scrutiny over privacy concerns under the GDPR in the EU. Talking Medicines uses ChatGPT to analyse Medically Sensitive information. 2+2 = TM not going to be active in the EU anytime soon.

HTH

Ignore at your peril.

https://mastodon.social/@glynmoody/111147666067029545

Just to note that whilst this has resulted from a complaint in Poland the GDPR is an EU wide regulation which, despite Brexit, still persists in the UK.

Whilst Talking Medicines may have crawled off to the US the GDPR is likely to be a big show stopper for them when it comes to operations within Europe.