Member Info for BobsSocks

"Can you explain what QBT have taken and what CLP have taken?"

No. That's the point isn't it? Even their accountants have concerns.

Do you not find it a bit strange that your Serial Entrepreneur,

https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/officers/jhCKYQ10zHy-fp1MkSXG8WaUEl8/appointments

The CEO of QBT is also a Director of BrainSpark,

https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/03782342/officers

With a deficit of £36 million apparently owed to QBT whose most recent acquisition appears to be,

https://quantumblockchaintechnologies.co.uk/investor-relations/investments/geosim

https://geosimcities.com/

A company that does Digital Twin Tecnology and the CEO of QBT is also a, the sole, director of,

https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/12379298/officers

https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/12379343/officers

How about,

INFUSION 2012 LIMITED

https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/07927542/officers

and

INFUSION (2009) LIMITED

https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/07077843/officers

Another pair of companies doing really well. 2009 even has an impressive website,

https://www.infusion2009.com/

"Infusion (2009) Limited is a consulting company operating in the area of advanced AI Technology, providing R&D services for highly demanding AI projects, where the limits of innovation are pushed well beyond the existing industrial know-how."

It's an impressive track record don't you think?

"Gone where?"

Gone. Gone. QBT and their previous noms de plumes have taken the cash and invested it elsewhere on busted flushes with not much likelihood of recovering it. Take Sipiem as an example.

It is the same as me putting food in the Cat. The Cat goes "nom nom nom" and then deposits the results in the neighbours garden. It is a sunk cost.

"No. The money is gone."

I suppose a more interesting question would relate to how much money has been invested in QBT by people such as yourself to further their domination of Blockchain and how much has gone into subsidiaries that produce 3D models of cities.

https://quantumblockchaintechnologies.co.uk/investor-relations/investments/geosim

https://geosimcities.com/

Digital Twin Technology no less,

https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/officers/jhCKYQ10zHy-fp1MkSXG8WaUEl8/appointments

LONDON DIGITAL TWIN LIMITED (12379298)

MILAN DIGITAL TWIN LIMITED (12379343)

I do apologise. I was just posting the Auditors opinion. Have you got a problem with the Auditors opinion? Do you think they are trying to get in lower? Do you think they have multiple accounts on LSE? Do you think they are being paid by a hedge fund to raise doubts over the going concern of QBT and one of their subsidiaries or the harm dormant companies might cause to QBT? Do you think they are ticking up everyone else's posts? Do you think those accusations count as facts?

No. The money is gone.

Than to go off topic in a thread followed by trying to move a topic to a new unrelated thread. Jambone knows all of the tools of the Troll.

"Parry tell me who and where is the Brainspark money owed Bob, let me know when you find out"

Thanks for enlightening us with your extensive knowledge, Not.

I would take a guess that they owe the £36 Million to the parent company, QBT. I assume the going concern statement relates to the parent company blowing itself up.

Indeed we find similar statements made in the most recent accounts from QBT, 14th July 2023.

https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/03926192/filing-history

In fact the auditors appear to seriously hardcore in their standard accounting language to cover their backs if things go heads up etc etc as mentioned by LtdAxis.

Of course if you are happy to invest in a company with a Market Cap of £20 Million owed £36 Million by just one of its subsidiaries and an audit report that had to make several pages of disclaimers as to knowing what other liabilities the company might have then that is your lookout.

Thank you for your comment.

Note to Moderators and Others.

Don't @ me and don't moan about it. It is public information.

https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/officers/jhCKYQ10zHy-fp1MkSXG8WaUEl8/appointments

Live Directorships.

REGENERATION ENABLING DEVICES INTERNATIONAL LIMITED (12618824)

LONDON DIGITAL TWIN LIMITED (12379298)

MILAN DIGITAL TWIN LIMITED (12379343)

MINER ONE LIMITED (11126697)

CLEAR LEISURE 2017 LIMITED (10661074)

BRAINSPARK ASSOCIATES LIMITED (03782342)

QUANTUM BLOCKCHAIN TECHNOLOGIES PLC (03926192)

INFUSION 2012 LIMITED (07927542)

INFUSION (2009) LIMITED (07077843)

OVERSEAS PROPERTIES AND ASSETS LIMITED (07314713)

Miner One would be the previous attempt at mining Bitcoin. The other two that caught my eye were,

QUANTUM BLOCKCHAIN TECHNOLOGIES PLC (03926192)

https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/03926192/filing-history

BRAINSPARK ASSOCIATES LIMITED (03782342)

https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/03782342/filing-history

The first is kind of obvious. The second perhaps not so much but the accounts mention an investment in Geosim Systems Ltd,

https://quantumblockchaintechnologies.co.uk/investor-relations/investments/geosim

Brainspark itself is described as being wholly reliant on funding from QBT. The company has net liabilities of £36 Million and there is a statement in the accounts about a "Material uncertainty related to going concern".

"The impact of this together with other matters set out in the note, indicate that a material uncertainty exists that may cast significant doubt on the Company's and parent company's ability to continue as a going concern. Our opinion is not modified in respect of this matter. In auditing the financial statements, we have concluded that the Director's use of the going concern basis of accounting in the preparation of the financial statements is appropriate"

https://pascalworks.com/qbt/pictures/matunc.png

https://pascalworks.com/qbt/pictures/goicon.png

Notice that whilst the auditors conclude that the Directors use of going concern is appropriate it is still their opinion that the Company Brainspark is subject to a "Material uncertainty related to going concern". Furthermore they appear to imply that the same "Material uncertainty related to going concern" applies to the the parent company, "and parent company's ability", Quantum Blockchain Technologies.

Again that is a statement from the auditors. Read the words yourselves and reach your own conclusions.

Sorry. As you were. It's about something different. I'll take a guess that claim is going to be blown up for lack of clarity.

Https://register.epo.org/ipfwretrieve?apn=US.202017029880.A&lng=en

https://register.epo.org/ipApplication?documentId=LN36E0YJXBLUEX1&number=US.202017029880.A

Claim 1) A method for providing prediction-as-a-service through intelligent blockchain code, the method comprising: analyzing transaction data stored on a blockchain in a blockchain network; automatically executing self-executable computer-executable code stored on the blockchain to (i) apply a predictive artificial intelligence model in the blockchain network based on the analyzed transaction data and (ii) trigger one or more actions in relation to an enterprise;[[and]]automatically instructing the enterprise to execute the one or more actions in response to executing the self-executable computer-executable code; and automatically modifying logic of the self-executable computer-executable code on the blockchain based on application of the predictive artificial intelligence model in the blockchain network.

Coffemate. The cat gets the milk.

Just a coffee and a glass of water.

Https://register.epo.org/application?number=EP22793447&lng=en&tab=main

Most recent event 20.12.2023 PCT data prior to European publication

https://register.epo.org/application?number=EP22793447&lng=en&tab=legal

Entry into regional phase

20.12.2023 National basic fee paid

20.12.2023 Designation fee(s) paid

20.12.2023 Examination fee paid

Don't forget that they have requested "Acceleration of Processing , Early Entry into the European Phase" on this,

https://register.epo.org/application?documentId=LP8DZXVE15ITBUX&appnumber=EP22793447&showPdfPage=all&proc=

Sigh. It's like trying to get Jam out of a Slug.

The question to Jambone is in the title of the thread. Perhaps Jambone thought that if he said No I would ignore him and continue to insinuate that he was. I have never met anyone so small that they would stoop so low. However I would be interested to hear of others experiences and anecdotes.

Hi. Other Bob. I am still waiting for Jambone to answer the question as to whether he is a Paid Ramper. He almost managed to get there but might get distracted. Thanks.

"Sorry, just to be clear, I’m not paid to do anything."

Most people are paid money and do things.

Do you want to restate that in the context of the original question. "Are you paid to ramp?"

Look JamSlug. You were asked a simple question. Are you being paid to ramp? One of Yes or No is the required answer. The same as you demand from others and certainly not your whataboutery.

We can get back to why you abandoned your phone to compose this latest bit of not answering the question assuming you did not phone a friend and get them to write it for you in properly punctuated sentences and almost correct spelling using your login credentials. Hopefully LSE will not see an IP mismatch in your recent posts.

What's up Jambone. Are you a Slug. Did someone pour some of you own Salt on you?

You demand the same from others. Come on. Man Up and answer the questions.