Member Info for bobslob

Wow. impressive numbers, far better than i thought.

I stand corrected. i does seam they are not going to cancel all of them. i take it back, sorry if i offended you.

When a company does a share buy back the shares are cancelled. They don't stuff they away for later use. I cant work out if your just a moron or a troll

I'm with Lloyds, and got my open offer today.

This place is like FB, full or morons. Who cares , how you make your money, no one right or wrong. If you trade or take dividends, it your investment. own it. Oiled-up, stfu, filtered.

50k no

Https://www.proactiveinvestors.co.uk/companies/news/1028928/ftse-100-live-aviva-jumps-8-on-bid-rumours-blue-chips-rise-1028928.html

Ignore that wrong board.. ffs

I'm very comfortable thankyou. It sounds like your the one who is having issues with their investment. It really does come down to the price you buy at, if your bother to trade the ups and downs. im guessing you have just brought and sitting for the divi. Each to their own.

very selective on the year of 2008, why not 2011 at 26p, 2009 24p or 2006 at 30p.. of co**** it don't suit your narrative .

Lol

I think porsche lives in a parallel universe , either that or the nursing staff need to increase his meds.

Done with you pair of clowns. both filtered

It Blair trying to stay relevant, Tony Blair Institute backs proposals circulating in Whitehall. They back it. whoop doop

You seriously think a Tory gov will take notice on what Blair says.. get real

Yesterdays man, who is going to notice of him.

. The current cash balance is expected to fund the company into late Q2-2024

Shut up u muppet, go back to facebook.

BDEV Barratt Developments FTSE 100 463.9p 10.2p Interim 2.20% 08-Feb-23BDEV 08-Feb-23 Dividend Announcement 06-Apr-23 18-May-23

A 2010 law signed by then-President Barack Obama, widely known as Dodd-Frank, had created stricter regulations for banks with at least $50 billion in assets. These banks, which were deemed “systemically important” to the financial system, were required to undergo an annual Federal Reserve “stress test,” to maintain certain levels of capital (to be able to absorb losses) and liquidity (to be able to quickly meet cash obligations), and to file a “living will” plan for their quick and orderly dissolution if they were to fail.

The 2018 rollback got rid of the $50 billion threshold, which many banks had argued was needlessly encumbering them. Instead, among many other changes, the rollback law made the enhanced regulations standard only for banks with at least $250 billion in assets – only about a dozen banks at the time.

The rollback law did give the Federal Reserve the right to choose to apply the regulations to particular banks with at least $100 billion in assets, and it said that banks that met that $100 billion threshold would still face “periodic” Fed stress tests. Still, the change from a standard $50 billion threshold to a standard $250 billion threshold was widely described as a major victory for banks with assets below $250 billion.

The list included SVB, whose chief executive officer, Greg Becker, had urged Congress to raise the threshold.