The next focusIR Investor Webinar takes places on 14th May with guest speakers from Blue Whale Growth Fund, Taseko Mines, Kavango Resources and CQS Natural Resources fund. Please register here.
A site with a few of the things AVacta has done /doing
https://www.americanpharmaceuticalreview.com/APR-General-Search/?search=avacta
Hi guys, warm weather has no effect...
Also....take a look at this.
T Cell section.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-9142659/Previous-coronavirus-infection-gives-protection-against-reinfection-Oxford-vaccine.html
Debt free - it certainly does. My mistake , thanks for pointing that out.
Earliest you will hear about the UK gov tender award is 25th February.
2:0 timetable
https://atamis-1928.cloudforce.com/sfc/p/#0O000000rwim/a/4J000000kF2o/Nimf2TjqgwuCsAgwjhjdlbMfz2aIxOM0AYnN05vUadE
Prof Jon Deeks, Professor of Biostatistics and head of the Biostatistics, Evidence Synthesis and Test Evaluation Research Group, University of Birmingham, said:
“The Government’s plans to roll out mass testing using the Innova lateral flow test brings a real risk that it will increase rather than decrease the spread of Covid. The Government only appears to focus on benefits of testing – that of detecting previously undetected asymptomatic cases – and not the harms which are caused by misinforming people that they do not have Covid-19 infection when in fact they do. In Liverpool 60% of people who had the virus got a negative result from the Innova lateral flow test, and most important nearly a third of those who had high viral levels and are at very high risk of infecting others were wrongly told they were infection free. In Liverpool the test was done by trained staff – it is unclear who will do the tests in the community, but it is known that the ability of the test to detect Covid relates to the experience of the person using it.
“Test results lead people to change their behaviour. When you get a test result stating that you are free of disease people naturally feel safe and relax. With the Innova test this is false reassurance – there are reports that false negatives have led people to ignore symptoms leading to disease spread, and to less strictly adhere to behaviours which prevent disease spread. Alongside this, the Government is misleadingly overstated the accuracy of the test, wrongly telling schools and parents that “they [Innova tests] were shown to be as accurate in identifying a case as a PCR test”, and “these tests are very accurate”. The combination of such high numbers of false negatives with such wrong information will lead to tragic consequences. Innova is unfit for purpose.”
Thought I would add the page where link is...
https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Notice/da6f739f-90e5-491d-988d-8c90ea591e4a?origin=SearchResults&p=1
2:10.... Framework agreement on orders placed before 31st march ?
https://atamis-1928.cloudforce.com/sfc/p/#0O000000rwim/a/4J000000kF2n/dgWlVTfzDBId6PuHI3wqQJkSQ27vNbsDFEHm0bZNAq4
https://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/news/north-east-news/north-east-firm-develops-equipment-19616504
https://civil.ge/archives/389430
Just looked back into this chat site.....glad we are showing a pulse.
Worth a revisit.....
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=2o9tF4bOAVk
Cytiva video
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=xdoRK_h_4YU
After listening to the video this makes more sense now...
https://bidstats.uk/tenders/2021/W01/742392033