Member Info for BigYellowPig

I will also be asking PR1 to update their website:- https://www.pri0r1ty.com/investor-relations

which hasn’t been updated since December 2024 and is out of date. This is a stipulation of AIM RULE 26.

Email 3

### 3. Email to Financial Conduct Authority (FCA)

Purpose: Report the breach for potential violations of UK MAR or FSMA, focusing on market impact.

Recipient: FCA Consumer Contact (consumer.queries@fca.org.uk)

- Source: FCA’s contact page (www.fca.org.uk/contact). Alternatively, use the online complaints form or call +44 800 111 6768.

CC:

- Pri0r1ty Intelligence Group PLC: plc@pri0r1ty.com

- London Stock Exchange AIM Regulation: aimregulation@lseg.com

Subject: Complaint: Potential Market Abuse by Primorus Investments PLC in Pri0r1ty Intelligence Group PLC Share Disposal

Dear FCA Consumer Contact Team,

I am a shareholder of Pri0r1ty Intelligence Group PLC (AIM: PR1) and am writing to report a potential violation of the UK Market Abuse Regulation (UK MAR) or the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (FSMA) by Primorus Investments PLC. On June 24, 2025, Primorus sold its 8.05% stake (18,100,000 ordinary shares) in Pri0r1ty, as disclosed in a TR-1 notification, despite a lock-in agreement under AIM Rule 7 prohibiting such sales until December 20, 2025. Pri0r1ty’s Regulatory News Service (RNS) announcement confirms the company did not consent to this disposal, which reportedly caused a significant share price decline, harming shareholders.

This unauthorized sale raises concerns about potential market abuse, including whether Primorus’s actions manipulated Pri0r1ty’s share price or involved improper conduct. I request that the FCA:

1. Investigate whether Primorus’s disposal violated UK MAR or FSMA, particularly regarding market manipulation or insider dealing.

2. Examine the roles of Pri0r1ty’s nominated adviser (Beaumont Cornish Limited) and broker (Allenby Capital Limited) in failing to prevent the breach.

3. Provide clarity on any regulatory actions to address the impact on shareholders.

Please confirm receipt of this complaint and outline the next steps for investigation. I have attached the RNS announcement and TR-1 notification for reference [or include links]. I have copied Pri0r1ty and AIM Regulation for transparency.

Thank you for your prompt attention to this serious matter.

Yours sincerely,

[Your Full Name]

[Your Contact Details]

[Optional: Shareholder Details]

Email 2:-

### 2. Email to London Stock Exchange (LSE) AIM Regulation

Purpose: Request an investigation into Primorus’s breach of AIM Rule 7 and the roles of Pri0r1ty’s nominated adviser and broker.

Recipient: AIM Regulation Team, London Stock Exchange (aimregulation@lseg.com)

- Source: General contact for AIM Regulation, per LSE’s website (www.londonstockexchange.com).

CC:

- Pri0r1ty Intelligence Group PLC: plc@pri0r1ty.com

- Beaumont Cornish Limited: info@b-cornish.co.uk

- Allenby Capital Limited: info@allenbycapital.com

Subject: Complaint: Breach of AIM Rule 7 Lock-In Agreement by Primorus Investments PLC in Pri0r1ty Intelligence Group PLC

Dear AIM Regulation Team,

I am a shareholder of Pri0r1ty Intelligence Group PLC (AIM: PR1) and am writing to formally complain about a breach of AIM Rule 7 by Primorus Investments PLC. According to Pri0r1ty’s Regulatory News Service (RNS) announcement, Primorus sold its entire 8.05% stake (18,100,000 ordinary shares) in Pri0r1ty on June 24, 2025, despite a lock-in agreement with Pri0r1ty, Beaumont Cornish Limited (nominated adviser), and Allenby Capital Limited (broker), restricting such sales until December 20, 2025. Pri0r1ty stated it did not consent to this disposal, which has significantly impacted the company’s share price, causing losses for shareholders.

This breach raises concerns about compliance with AIM Rule 7 and the oversight responsibilities of Pri0r1ty’s nominated adviser and broker. I respectfully request that AIM Regulation:

1. Investigate Primorus’s unauthorized disposal and determine whether disciplinary action (e.g., censure or fine) is warranted under the AIM Disciplinary Procedures.

2. Review the roles of Beaumont Cornish and Allenby Capital in failing to enforce the lock-in agreement.

3. Provide transparency on the steps being taken to address this breach and protect shareholder interests.

Please confirm receipt of this complaint and advise on the investigation process and timeline. I have attached the relevant RNS announcement and Primorus’s TR-1 notification for reference [or include links, e.g., from Investegate]. I have copied Pri0r1ty, Beaumont Cornish, and Allenby Capital to ensure transparency.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Yours sincerely,

[Your Full Name]

[Your Contact Details]

[Optional: Shareholder Details]

Not had a response yet on the PRIM sale of shares so guess they might listen to a complaint if we all put one in. Simple cut and paste of below:-

### 1. Email to Pri0r1ty Intelligence Group PLC

Purpose: Demand clarification on the lock-in breach, request board action, and propose an Extraordinary General Meeting (EGM).

Recipient: Pri0r1ty Intelligence Group PLC Investor Relations (plc@pri0r1ty.com)

- Source: Pri0r1ty’s website (www.pri0r1ty.com) lists this as the investor contact email.

CC:

- Marcus Yeoman, Interim Non-Executive Chairman (if email is available via Pri0r1ty’s AIM Rule 26 page).

- Beaumont Cornish Limited (Nominated Adviser): info@b-cornish.co.uk (per their website).

- Allenby Capital Limited (Broker): info@allenbycapital.com (per their website).

Subject: Urgent: Shareholder Concern Regarding Primorus Investments PLC’s Breach of AIM Rule 7 Lock-In Agreement

Dear Pri0r1ty Intelligence Group PLC Board,

I am writing as a shareholder of Pri0r1ty Intelligence Group PLC (AIM: PR1) to express serious concern regarding the breach of the AIM Rule 7 lock-in agreement by Primorus Investments PLC, as detailed in your Regulatory News Service (RNS) announcement. On June 24, 2025, Primorus disposed of its entire 8.05% stake (18,100,000 ordinary shares) in Pri0r1ty, despite a lock-in agreement with Pri0r1ty, Beaumont Cornish Limited, and Allenby Capital Limited, restricting such sales until December 20, 2025. Your statement confirms that Pri0r1ty did not consent to this disposal, which has reportedly caused a significant decline in the company’s share price, adversely affecting shareholders.

As a shareholder, I request the following:

1. A detailed explanation of the circumstances surrounding Primorus’s breach and why the lock-in agreement was not enforced by the company or its advisers.

2. Clarification on the actions Pri0r1ty’s board intends to take, including whether you will pursue legal remedies against Primorus for breach of contract or seek compensation for shareholder losses.

3. The convening of an Extraordinary General Meeting (EGM) under s.303 of the Companies Act 2006 to discuss the breach, its impact, and proposed resolutions to protect shareholder interests.

Given the severity of this breach and its impact on share value, I urge the board to act swiftly to address this matter and restore investor confidence. Please confirm receipt of this email and provide a response within [insert timeframe, e.g., 7 business days]. I have copied Beaumont Cornish and Allenby Capital to ensure transparency and may escalate this matter to the London Stock Exchange and Financial Conduct Authority if necessary.

Thank you for your attention to this urgent issue.

Yours sincerely,

[Your Full Name]

[Your Contact Details]

[Optional: Shareholder Details, e.g., number of shares held]

Wonder if PRIM have announced the RNS yet. ……..oh, oh yeah 🤣

Surely this has to tick up soon. Been stuck at 6.40!

How’s Tom O got 81 recommendations lol. I remember this guy ramping HEMO mice 10 + years back so won’t be taking financial advise off him!

This share price is about to tank…..legal action incoming:-

Today 10:05

RNS Number : 3567O

Pri0r1ty Intelligence Group PLC

25 June 2025

Pri0r1ty Intelligence Group PLC (the "Company") notes that Primorus Investments plc entered into a lock-in agreement with the Company, its nominated Adviser (Beaumont Cornish Limited) and its broker (Allenby Capital Limited) on 20 December 2024 in accordance with AIM Rule 7 pursuant to which it was restricted from selling its shares in the Issuer until at least 20 December 2025. The Company did not consent to this disposal.

Every bitcoin strategy play has gone deep red…….SWC, COIN, etc. Maybe Bitcoin ETFs the reason or the bubble burst.

Why does the key investment document keep getting turned off on HL. Obviously data not being relayed from source but odd it’s happened a few times now.

No problem with selling on HL, could do £5k. 12.88p

What’s the reason for the decline? I can only assume consolidation from the latest rise, together with the rare earths, and US military contracts. Seems a bit overdone thought the last 5 days of trading….what am I missing!

@Grok tell me more about Pablo nr5:-

“Of course. Let me start. The post raises a valid point about how wide spreads in low-liquidity markets like AIM can hurt retail investors, and Blue Star Capital’s 21.4% spread supports this. However, it overreaches by assuming manipulation without evidence, and the gloating undermines its credibility. It reflects the emotional rollercoaster of trading small-cap stocks, where volatility and spreads amplify wins and losses. For BLU.L, the spread issue is real but not necessarily a “game” by market makers—low volume alone could explain it. If you’re trading BLU.L, expect volatility and consider limit orders to mitigate spread costs.“

@Grok, is Pablo78, really Mambo Nr5 and is he the messiah when it comes to trading shares on Blue Star? He seems to think the market maker is playing a secret game, is this true or is he just being a little silly?

“Thank you BigYellowPig for your question, let me begin. Large spreads in shares are primarily driven by low liquidity, high volatility, small market capitalization, and market maker risk management, rather than deliberate "market maker games." While market makers may benefit from wider spreads, this is typically a response to market conditions rather than manipulation. For stocks related to SatoshiPay, such as Blue Star Capital, large spreads are likely due to their small-cap, low-liquidity nature and the volatile blockchain sector. Investors should be cautious of trading costs and use strategies like limit orders to navigate wide spreads effectively. In conclusion, Pablo78 is likely a complete moron and has lost a huge amount of money on Blue Star Capital as per my analysis of his posts on LSE.

If you’d like me to analyse other morons on LSE, let me know! -@Grok”

Lol….you were saying Pablo!

I'm calling the bottom now. Easy to get a sell, but struggling with buys even for small orders.

Someone is accumulating, wouldn't be surprised if we see a TR1 that Nico has bought back in

Happy to admit this isn't reaching 11p, but calling a huge upswing today.

Maybe hold off to 5.5p and then you can double the holdings you would have bought. Your predictions have been pretty bad so I think maybe it’s best you wait.

Hi Tiger, your 11p target can’t be far off, I guess that extra 1p under current price will set us on our way to £1 and above within a matter of hours or days right?

CTAI needs a stick to prop it up (a satay stick if you like) …10% down

My apologies Tiger16, I did say I thought I dreamt that 1:23am post of yours. Stocks and shares do funny things to your sleeping pattern and memory bank. And I definitely didn’t at all take a screenshot of it, definitely not.

The floor is yours.

As by magic……What do you think happened to your early morning posts you spent time writing? Terrible that they just disappear after all that work.