Member Info for big-blue

Hilarious. I am attacked based on the info from Investopidea as if somehow the text on their website will magically change and align itself with different ideas. In your fantasy heads, you believe all sorts of twisted fantasies but when confronted with some verifiable real world facts, then the regression into denial and lashing out begins.

When, not if, but when it crashes below 200, that is when my alert is set. After that I will be only interested in high volatility trading with volume 100 times present numbers at a minimum. Only when approaching the 120s, 100s, 90s will I give any consideration to some rapid buy sells day trading. This is far too risky a share for anything else. And the way things are with the listing status, rigged anti-split boardroom antics and precarious financial position, coupled with the encroachment of sanctions to directly impact POLY, even holding a day trade for just a few hours is, for me, a the highest level of risk. This share will rapidly descend into a casino share where buying and selling will be a simple gamble between gaining a quick buck or losing the lot.

People need to seek independent financial advice dealing wit this share, just look at how easily the fantasists are aroused with a few pennies gain before the angry posting starts when it pulls back again.

NewD, if you have a problem with the Investopedia tutorial, complain to them. I didn't write it. I would put greater reliance on their descriptors than on yours given the extent of revision and editorial oversight given to what they say. Which is of course your issue and the constant problem from me for many on here, I constantly reference sources with much better credentials than other comments on here which constantly reveals the deliberate misdirection and outright lies posted here. That must be very annoying.

https://www.investopedia.com/top-gold-stocks-q2-2023-7372643

And you will note here, POLY metal International doesn't even get a mention.

https://www.investopedia.com/financial-edge/0311/what-drives-the-price-of-gold.aspx

For gawd sake will you people at least do some basic reading up on elementary money market dynamics before posting the utter crap that you do.

Worry about DELIST, okay.
Also worry about NOT DELIST!

Make your mind up.

You're in a full on fantasy land. That is typically a response from people faced with a truth but so unwilling to accept it they regress into pure fantasy. Callous is killing somebody with a bomb without regard for the dozens injured because you don't like what they wrote on a 'blog'. The west is a long, long way from being 'callous'.
You are now as deluded as JN. The louder you doth protest, the clearer it is.

You total fool!

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/02/10/us-special-operations-ukraine-surrogate-program/

Most of that info is public knowledge. Most of the Pax in Ukraine are diplomatic and security dealing with people in transit (visiting VIPs) and non-Ukrainian civilians registered there engaged in NGO humanitarian work. Did you think Biden and others travel with no security detail? The great revelation of secrets is mainly a snap shot of current situational awareness, planned movements of persons of interest and monitoring missions. There is little info of use from the Russian point of view unless they specifically want to start assassinating the next round of VIPs or NGO personnel. This is rather low level stuff at the end of the day and as the news pieces shows a lot of this kind of material is in the public domain anyway.

Look, look ---- over there ---- it's a straw!
GRAB IT QUICK!!!!!

You took your tin foil hat off again, I can read your thoughts Fancy Bear......

Are you a 'drop' contributor to Q.Anon JN? You are well versed in the conspiracy crap. If you're not in the loop, then it must all be some giant con because you are so important you couldn't possibly be ignored, could you?

"what we are witnessing is the start of the demise of the world's hegemonic superpower, who will do anything to keep hold of that power "

Rubbish! The US hates being 'the world's policemen' and is constantly turning away from many conflicts. Generally it requires campaigns emerging from the UN and then wall to wall media led with highly emotive reporting in the US to push the US into getting involved. A few issues do get a fast response but the Vietnam war is still a very deep scar in the American psyche. It is easy to spin US involvement as some sort of domination or oppression but virtually every action is sourced back to the UN. The other big impact was 9/11 which put the US on a more defensive footing and did lead to more direct action, especially against Iraq. But the propaganda line trying to blame the US for the Arab spring or Syrian war or many other less reported issues does not hold up because to avoid those issues the S would have to have had a huge amount of intervention in dozens of conflict theatres. It is actually active historically and currently in very few theatres. It's biggest impact is in sanctions and those are applied against aggressive regimes and largely at the best of the UN.

Not sure what the big revelation is here. Europe was set up specifically as a counter balance to the USA and has frequently gone against the grain and postured as independent from the USA. The only thing that really ties Europe to the US is NATO. But the big complication for Europe is the Soviet Europe complex with the unelected central Junta issuing policy all the states are forced to adopt in law, then the state leaders like Marcon who act as if they are the leaders of Europe. However, that doesn't stop a general anti-US attitude which has been there since De Gaul's days. He even had issues with US forces being involved in WWII. The EU activists are generally pompous snobs who think they are the world leaders and everybody else looks up to them. Net zero for example is an EU cult which the instigators believe is the greatest movement since the dawn of time and they expect the rest of the planet to follow by default. The EU has it's head stuffed deep up it's own a****. Thank gawd the UK got out just in time.

JN you are a remarkable fantasist. You're like the lead supporter of a Sunday league football club day dreaming of winning the FA cup. You are beyond reason. You pick up a work of fiction, expressing your dreams, and then re-program your mind with the fictional alternative reality. You then live in the physical world but with your mind's internal processing configured to that fictional world. In court it is know as diminished responsibility. There is simply no way to take you seriously at all.

One very interesting part of that story which rather gives away just what a load of bull it is.

Russians claim to be pulling bodies out of the rubble. Therefore this means the site must be within any Russian held territory not under counter offensive attacks.

Now think it through. The claim is there is a major NATO headquarters with hundreds of staff ----------- inside Russian held territory!

And people spreading the propaganda didn't spot just how absurd the claim was?

And these people think that when NATO finally does go in, there is any chance of defending Russia in weeks, let alone days, before the country is fully occupied and placed under UN control? I've heard credible estimates that Russia will submit to full occupation in less than 11 days. There will be virtually no resistance to air superiority except around Putin's palaces where SAMs will be active. The big hold up to launching the invasion is the Chinese. Not that they object, but whether they will push it and take far more territory in the east than agreed, and take Mongolia in the process. The Chinese are bargaining Taiwan against large chunks of eastern Russia and adjoining territories (Mongolia by political deed though rather than military attack). There is a lot of chatter on the diplomatic wires and most of it is about breaking up and eliminating 'Russia' as a future threat to anybody and how it will be shared out. The sabre rattling with nukes has sealed Russia's ultimate fate by what I've heard.

"consumables NOT sourced from China."

should read

"Cashflow is critical to operation, hence why there is such a large chunk in Yuan since sanctions have meant consumables are noW sourced from China. "

consumables NOT sourced from China.

A typo! Go celebrate.

"breakdown of the cash available in the various accounts around the world"

Should read

"breakdown of the debt in the various accounts around the world"

That's the presentation. EVERYTHING is quoted in $ except one single pie chart which is a breakdown of the cash available in the various accounts around the world that can be drawn on, Roubles 28%, Yuan 7%, EU 1$ and $ 64%. You can not simply convert the cash position into one currency and declare the debt is therefore magically reduced, not least because cash is not held to off-set debt in the first place. Cash is there to use on costs, direct and indirect. Cashflow is critical to operation, hence why there is such a large chunk in Yuan since sanctions have meant consumables are not sourced from China.

You made a really silly effort to fiddle the numbers to try and spin debt down and only succeeded in making an absolute fool of yourself. Don't insult everybody's intellect by then trying to explain yourself. It is actually quite insulting when people like you post crap like that thinking nobody will know any different.

Absolute rubbish. The debt is accounted for in $ in the accounts, not RUB and that is what is reported to the stock exchange and this is what is used for solvency purposes. You can't switch around currencies for the convenience of creative accounting. No business would go bust if that was allowed.