RE: Thoughts?10 Apr 2022 18:28
It is unlikely most of his nukes are even viable. The equipment of the Russian army has been revealed to be very poorly maintained and not fit for purpose. The fissile material will have decayed and very unlikely upgraded since Soviet days, and critical components dry jointed over and rusted over time. I would be surprised if half the relays or contact switches would move or make an electrical connection. As with the perception of the mighty army, the perception of the nukes is not justified. There will be some viable nukes, but it might be less than one in a hundred. And should there finally be a successful detonation, the decrepit state might well reduce the yield 90, 95% I happen to know rather a lot about those warheads.
The ICBMs are probably the best maintained and most likely viable with routinely upgrades fissile material. But the response from the west? I can guarantee, all the US and UK warheads are viable and maintained for maximum yield. There will be one guaranteed loser from a nuclear war, it will be Russia. The west may take some heavy damage in some cities, probably a lot less than you see in Mariapol though and most of it due to fire damage. It'll be a high casualty exchange but nothing like the Armageddon the likes of CND promised. Perhaps in the 80s, but certainly not today. And of course, ICBMs have to get past modern western air defences. Russia will be dust and deleted.