RE: No buy quote at close15 Jun 2022 00:37
Snowking,
Show me an RNS saying 'Prem will receive $20 m a month in early 2023' and I'd be delighted. The fact of the matter is we are not going to get this RNS and PREM has only produced approx. $250k in revenue in the last 9 years, from a few shipments of tungsten from RHA. Hence why the information provided via RNS needs to be treated with a lot of care. There is a reason a disclaimer is made on forward looking statements in RNSs. If RNSs were gospel I would be a millionaire by now and retired in my mid 30s.
There was nothing which stood out to me in yesterday's RNS apart from the 18,000m drilled. That is fantastic but I'd massively prefer to know what meterage has been tested and results received back and how more metres have been processed and sent to the lab. The Q3 2022 DFS you preached about isn't looking too promising. Shame PREM didn't get the drilling rigs mobilised a few months earlier.
On the development of the 'mini large' mine, PREM is running the risk of not knowing whether it want's to develop a small pilot mine to test the product for flowsheets etc. or develop a larger (but still relatively small) mine which costs a lot more money but still won't provide anywhere near the output a large scale mine would and would have much higher marginal costs than a large mine. They should go with one or the other and not get caught in an halfway house.
The other elephant in the room is securitisation of debt. If Suzhou or anyone else provide a few hundred $m for mine development, or even just for development of the mini-large mine then they will need security against their debt. Anyone who thinks they will provide that kind of money without any security has no idea how finance works.
Also, I have no doubt you have many more shares than I do. I have 15m. That is down to timing and personal circumstances but in no way points towards you having greater powers of clairvoyancy than anyone else who posts here.
I've said this before and I'll say this again, don't confuse realism with pessimism. The potential here is huge, we all know that, but it comes with a massive amount of risk, especially with someone like GR running the show. I like to get into the detail of what the risks are as that it a huge part of what I do in my day job. I know some on here, the majority of which are from the Telegram Group don't like realism but its the way I work. The realism and lack of understanding of some basic economic principles was too much for some in the group and hence I was booted from it a long time ago. Probably the best thing that happened to me given the lack of objectivity.
I'll repeat, the potential here is huge. But not without a massive amount of risk, especially with GR at the helm.
Bickmaster