Member Info for Bfdinvestor

Kat strangler my apologies I was a day out, probably due to my head being woolly from a car crash.

I was actually referring to January 31st, where the volume was 11m or so and the sp fell sharply for no apparent reason.

Maybe, rather than making sweeping assumptions, you could try to explain that.

Fwiw I was buying here in the 0.3's so am not sat on a fat loss and trying to persuade anybody to do anything.

Wrt the sp, markets aren't rationale, plenty of businesses are valued incorrectly, otherwise there would be no point in investing. This business is significantly advanced from where it was when it was valued at 3p per share, so which valuation was more correct?

You seem to focus on supposed rampers repeating the same things, yet you do exactly the same yourself, just in a negative way.

Personally I want an honest open debate, with opportunity and risk equally considered, I'm not sure you are after the same thing

It's quite funny, Dicks by name, dicks by nature

Two more for the filter bin!

Kat if you paid more attention to actual numbers rather than stupid sound bites you may have more credibility

So more shares were traded yesterday than on Thursday, when the sp was walked down stupidly. The buy proportion yesterday was about 75%.

So the surprise is that the SP didn't move up more , not that there was any lack of buyers.

It seems it is being manipulated to me

Thornogson, we have only just exited January which is the first of three months in a quarter.

I guess your maths matches your integrity

They seem to follow a protocol of issuing an RNS when the first patient has been dosed.

We know that they have started screening for patients but we don't know how many, if any, have been found yet.

I'd guess they are being super selective this time so the process may take longer.

Either way can't be more than another few weeks at most I'd think

Crawshaw I've had this debate a few times now.

Other than ASOS I don't know of any other viable business that is valued at c3 months revenue

Draw from that what you will as I have zero interest in the kind of petulant argument that you seem to enjoy

Aim sadly there seems to be a couple atleast on every relatively popular board

Thanks James

I've put a fair bit of time into trying to understand this market, as it's a fascinating and complex area.

I'm still not sure anybody understands it completely, least of all the supposed regulators.

The conclusion I've come to is that the BOD of this business understand it far better than most and have a strategy to make a lot of money. It isn't without risk, it's an early stage business and make not get market traction, but the odds are good that it will.

It's why I try to be objective because I want to have honest debates to improve my own (and hopefully others) investing decisions. It's hard enough to make money without idiots throwing smoke screens.

I wonder if I am in Zag's gang of four, after all he accused me of ramping non stop a couple of days ago, which couldn't be further from the truth.

Although Zag usually seems to be a fair way from the truth. For example, his comment about the sp potentially being 0.8 by now.

It's kind of funny to see 10m buys and 4m sells and the sp totally flat.

It really is being played now

It's hard to understand the stupidity of some of the posting on this board

Superdry has revenue a third of Boo and, even after today's rise, just over a tenth of the market cap.

It would seem that Superdry isn't so highly rated lol

Wolfy i don't care about what happens at JAY.

I do care about the lies you post on this board and am happy to call them out, especially when you show your total stupidity.

Why on earth did you try to pretend that Troy being a non exec at JAY was new news that would crater the sp here today?

It's just malicious nonsense isn't it?

Chris what do those odds refer to?

Not a company with proven assets, a funding partner in place, no objections to its licence in a safe jurisdiction.

If it wasn't for the quality of the management i doubt you would get odds at all.

Lloyd, it's clear as day to me that it is being played.

Just look at this morning, a couple of million sells leads to a sharp fall, the equivalent in buys leads to a small fall

It's plain daft

Max I know

It was kind of tragically funny that Wolfy thought Troy becoming a non exec at JAY was new news that would crash the sp today!

When any actual investor knew that it was communicated "officially" in December.

It's funny that he resorts to abuse because he has nothing else!!

Wolfy this is what you posted

you want a laugh whilst we all wait here for any type of update, go to the Helium one board😂 your see why people lose so much money on investing

Either you are too thick to understand how it reads or you are now just lying

You really are special aren't you

Do you have a make believe investment in HE1 as well.

Wolfy it takes a special kind of person to take pleasure in others losing money.

You must make your family proud

Thanks

Just a quick question

Was he trolling the board when the sp went from 4p to 17p?

As I've said this is just a fun punt for me.

As long as it doesn't cease trading, there should be a decent chance of a good return at sub 1p

Hard to countenance the stupidity of some people

Wolfy, just what do you think is official?

Troy was officially communicated as a non exec of Bluejay in December

And yes he was on the BOD here

Just comical

Cantor Fitzgerald and Spreadex are obviously working in tandem

The only explanation that makes sense to me is that cantor bought the shares for Spreadex to short

Anybody got a better explanation

Oh but remember Wolfy, you could never give any substantiation to your big seller theory!

Do you think a big buyer is active today?