Member Info for Bfdinvestor

Both this site and HL state that we ended the day flat chef.

How much stupidity can you post in one day.

Why no apology for this morning's ridiculous post?

Rob it should be blatantly obvious to you that not all on here actually do want KOD to do well.

Suay Chin may decide to keep a stake, especially if they believe, as most seems to, that Hainan will take Kod out at a premium

Well we've certainly got the good, the bad and the ugly on here level5.

All we need now is a few dollars more.

High noon can't be far away

This should be c£10m market cap atleast

However the BoD don't seem able to deliver

It's on Aim and it's being played

If the BoD actually do something tangible it should fly. But it's an if.....

And you can look at the historic revenue figure for the market place business on Companies House. It was just shy of £40m in FY24.

I'd be disappointed if it isn't well above £50m this year

What debt are you referring to LD?

Debenhams has no debt. The debt sits at the group level. Debenhams is cash generative

Why do you think the value is inflated, especially when bench marked against the examples I gave before

After posting such stupidity, you would think any actual investor would be too embarrassed to post again. It seems only one person agrees with him. So that makes two with no idea

Silverfoxchef

Posted in: KOD

Posts: 545

Price: 0.245

No Opinion

RnsToday 07:11

Steve on the scrounge taking warrants at an eight of sp.

Nose in trough time for the boys.

Revenue based solely on the market place element

Quite simple LD, somewhere between 5 to 10 times forward looking revenue

Not me southcoast, although it would appear you and spideystreet have been here that long.

No wonder you are both so angry

So you are seriously stating that Debenhams is only worth what Boo paid for the brand name and a little over 2.5 times what Ashley paid for the Missguided name.

And you are also stating that it is worth only a third of the value associated with the recent sale of Top Shop

You really need a break

Lowest price a company can raise funds at is by definition the lowest buy price.

I see you are still avoiding the question about agreeing with the chef's stupidity, so I assume you do.

Typical troll behaviour no idea

Keep living down to that name

Southcoast doesn't lay out any facts LD

I've presented plenty.

I've also explained why I'm here, which is primarily for Debenhams, which is worth more than the current entire market cap.

Why do you think Frasers haven't sold a bean

Southcoast is clearly getting desperate lol

He's pulling the old Kamani has resigned from all the subsidiaries out again for about the 15th time.

He forgets to say that he has been replaced by Finley, which is how it should be.

It's exactly what I wrote ivenoidea.

So do you agree with the nonsense the chef posted, because you are avoiding the subject in typical troll fashion

You just need to look at the actual trades to see the idiot games they are playing Billy!

Cheers Bily obviously more your area of expertise than mine!

Roger65 i presume you didn't even bother to read the RNS, you simply jumped on the chef's apron strings

Absolutely comical

So you don't agree that the nominal value of a share is the lowest price that a share can be bought at then noidea?

Do you therefore think the chef is correct in his stupid statement, because that is what your post implies?

Good to see you living down to your name

It will definitely show on our balance sheet Billy.

I'm not sure enough on the accountancy front to say with any confidence how the revenue will be accounted for

Perhaps there is an accountancy expert who could confirm