Member Info for Bfdinvestor

I didn't see you ask any question about a placing?

I'd hope not, I'd far rather they sold some of the WCS shares.

I've got an average of just over 0.2.

Am thinking of buying a few more but will probably hold off a couple of days

Less than impressed by the new directors but that is a constant.

However, the simple fact is that, even if they go for the smelter royalty on EH, the revenue stream would justify a significantly higher market cap than presently

So what's your angle then

So you have no shares pebsi?

Bloggs either you can't read or have no interest in reading

That's no surprise, as I've stated before you have no interest in any debate, just repeating your own toxic agenda

Your last post has highlighted that perfectly, so job done from my perspective

I'm sure you will make another pointless post, but don't expect a reply

It would seem that Bloggs can't do basic maths.

The answer to your question is 1.1 Bloggs so nowhere near the figure you claim.

Way to the upside obviously

Cheers Danny, so they in no way account for the massive buys a few weeks back

The height of stupidity is he thinks Kod are currently producing from 1% ore.

Our fountain of knowledge fails to understand the difference between indicated and inferred

Lilpeep don't bother with him.

He will always have one more post than you.

He isnt here for a debate, just to keep posting his BS.

Why he does it I've no idea

They could sell some of the WCS shares

im guessing this is more Shemasian antics in anticipation of getting as many shares as possible

What stake do they have Danny

It would make sense George, we will definitely have atleast 10k tonnes to ship

What is the grade on the indicated resource for Ngoulana bloggs and the inferred for Bougouni

This is the last direct response you will get Bloggs until you learn to leave the infant playground with your puerile and childish name calling

Ancient data again bloggs, go check the latest RNS.

Lots of intersections way above your figure.

Why are you so focussed on twisting historic information, is it because you don't like how positive the future is looking

Maybe buy some shares

So the troll trinity are getting posts removed.

To reiterate Bloggs, if something is representative, it isnt cherry picked.

In the same way Bernard wasn't scared to go to the inauguration as you claimed the night before

It should never have been below 2p

Please see the users that stated issues regarding selling, thankyou for your assistance on this matter.

Irrelevant southcoast, it was you who stated there were no buyers

Keep lying and twisting, it seems it is all you are good for

Do we have an RNS with the current projected or confirmed recoveries which is a bit closer to the present day?

George check out the RNS from 16 December 2022 and then subsequent presentations that talk about 70% recovery rate.

It's strange that Bloggs talks about an adult conversation then he and his later ego keep referring to a supposed gfd. Nobody by that name posts on this board.

It's a shame they can't leave the infant playground.

Oh Bloggs that's an ancient RNS that has been superceded by the 70% assumption many times

So let's be clear, Bloggs who apparently based his purchase decision on this board, now knows better than a team of geologists and miners who have stated that expected recovery rate is 70%

Good to know that we have the fountain of all knowledge on here.....

Strange southcoast last week, or was it the week before, you were claiming there were no buyers.

You just can't help lying can you