Member Info for Berrin

Brilliant as ever AML_007 Paul. Who knows nonsense man has become addicted to your weekly slapping so we'll never get rid of him < Roll Eyes >

Repetition compulsion. "Repetition compulsion is a term coined by psychoanalyst Sigmund Freud. It refers to the tendency to unconsciously repeat traumatic events or patterns of behavior from the past." Traumatic event with the share price around the time of the IPO is what is apparently underlying, here and as I mentioned, there is nothing we can do for him.

It's not about being right or wrong. It's about being constructive how to turn AML around (and discuss it). A lot has been done in the last 12-15 months, all good decisions, to me. The core issue is not the product, it's sales. In bad times you need to gain market share. That's what needs to happen.

There is nothing we can do to help him and meanwhile I wouldn't want to, either.

In the interest of Brandolini's law, it's best to ignore him and leave it up to AML_007 Paul to show him off once in a while and < roll eyes>

What's he saying always ...? "Same nonsense, different day" ;>)

Amazing summary, AML_007, sad facts. As you will also say: < roll eyes >

The answer is no(nsense).

SAME day, same nonsense.

"They are selling the f1 team stake and taken out 160m of the 170m revolving credit facility to avoid a raise."

The answer is no(nsense). As usual. Absolute nonsense!

For a change I'm showing why/where i.e. page 4, H1 results 'Available facilities' = 104.1m (out of 165.6m)

I won't reply to nonsense man, in accordance with Brandolini's law (thank you AML_007).

I'm not invested.

The answer is no(nsense).

Nonsense man is making up numbers.

Closed.

"Different day, same nonsense."

Exactly. Applauding you, Paul.

"So because an idiot copied one of my posts, you presume we are the same person?"

The Answer is No(one believes you).

I've not been invested here since September (and no intention) but clearly...

The Answer is No(nsense). As ever.

So much nonsense, so little time. (Thanks, AML_007).

The Answer is No(nsense).

Ref. is made to Brandolini's law and therefore: CLOSED.

The answer is No(nsense), once again. Big nonsense, that is.

I'm not more positive when compared to the analysts, at all ... but the deposits to drop to zero 'over night' ??

C2 "But Berrin refuses to believe..." So much nonsense, so little time.

The Answer isn't No.

The Answer is No(nsense) !

I will mention again that generally I’m absolutely pro “inclusion” no matter what’s someone’s opinion, negative or positive, language or origin.

Opposed to that, if someone posts the same message six times as well as false information and lies, I doubt he (and his colleagues) would respect other people’s opinion.

I can’t imagine this is unprecedented on the LSE discussion boards. I’m starting to believe LSE allows such people of, may I please say, lower human quality on their boards, because it will increase online traffic and further their business.

He says “…you're stuck with me, get over it.” So obviously he knows exactly what kind of category he falls into and does not have a high opinion of himself, either.

Again, in accordance with the Brandolini’s law, I’m not going to reply. Closed !

Thank you, AML__007 !! Six times in a single day? I thought this was a share discussion board, not a hospital.

Inclusion? Yes, absolutely but this is out of dimension besides the other nonsense such as false information.

This user should be banned by LSE or by the board's council if there is and give him some time to think about it.

My opinion and I'm going to post it only once.

Well, it doesn't take long to identify the who's who or what on here.

Again, quote AML_007 "So much nonsense, so little time." !

Reference is made to Brandolini's law, again. Any dialogue will generate more waste. No use. Closed !

The way he's pieced together those figures (plus some assumptions behind on top) is incorrect, as usual. The result "£40m short" (I think he means -£40m free cash flow), this time I wish he was correct ! It will be more (negative)!

What a muppet. Quote AML_007 " So much nonsense, so little time", I fully agree, once again.

Nonsense. He's got no clue how to calculate debt, correctly. Closed.

"...so anyone who expects FCF positive in H2 is not to be trusted."

Again, FALSE information. So much nonsense by cry-wolf-man. Every time he talks numbers, he gets it wrong. Awful.

You can easily extract from the consensus numbers that ALL analysts expect a positive FCF in H2/2024 as follows:

H2/2024 :

Consensus FCF high +184 mil

Consensus FCF average +114 mil

Consensus FCF low + 26 mil

This looks surprisingly positive, no doubt.