RE: RM should be sacked15 May 2024 18:48
Hodgeyd,
With a smile on my face, I would gladly make anyone a nice cup of tea but certain posters will also know that theirs would be made using a dirty spoon. :)
Back to the Company,
I've no reason to doubt the work effort by RM and have never commented on the subject.
(Myself included) The vast majority of investors here, would have seen this company as a good opportunity to buy in when the company is small and wait a few years for the company to grow before selling with some really decent profits... Simple effective plan.
As time goes by the market /Investors want to know how the company is doing and want to also gauge the progress against the company's (and their own) expectations/ aspirations.
It goes without saying, that they also want the company to follow the listing requirements and obligations.
The above isn't rocket science, it's just the basic duties that is required of the company to the market /shareholders.
A properly run company,
Would have the proper update structure in place, using the same metrics and performance indicators, for every periodic update and it would also contain a view from the company on its own performance and an explanation as to why.
(in-line with expectations is a very common phrase for various companies )
Currently,
The company does not adhere to this and uses a variety of methods, when updating the market / shareholders.
Current Shareholders,
The majority seem quite content using the "word of mouth" as a metric method.
For example,
People really believe funding is close and it will be like a domino effect after the audit but in reality it might be not much further than two people talking in a bar.
This is because of the procedures in securing funding include, due diligence, legal teams drawing up agreeable legal terms and then the signing of a non-binding terms agreement (that has to be put into a RNS to update the market) and only then the funding can be considered close...