Member Info for Basscadet

That's a pretty strong statement that commercial production will happen this time. Can't see any reason for a placement BtB. Costs are low and significant investment isn't needed to scale up. If anything consolidating the two facilities will reduce costs further.

Can't see any graphene commercialisation any time soon. There just isn't the products or the markets yet. Hope to be prove wrong.

I remember you saying that at the time BtB and a valuable perspective.

Is that the same as saying people buy things when prices are low and sell things when prices are high?

Yeah, people keep saying it but I can't imagine a use case that would get me involved. I've tried it - meh. Hope I'm wrong and NANO make a bathtub full of cash. I can see enhancements to existing uses being much more valuable - driving, cameras, health sensors, etc.

Damn! More gscale than GSCALE then.

Indeed. Need something concrete numbers from STM or NANO to move the SP. AR / VR are niche as far as I'm concerned. Can't see them generating much in the way of sales.

Fair enough but it wasn't much of a suggestion. I was referring to an article on TechRadar. It was speculating on the word "Peek" and a floating Apple logo in the teaser clip. However, they said they were way out on the furthest edges of speculation and it was too soon to expect such an announcement. Mentioning it was just a bit of fun. It doesn't fit NANO's timeline so I didn't even bother with the link. My bad but storm in a teacup it would appear.

Answers to some of those questions are on the Website. Limited edition run of 500 at £30k each. Should not need planning permission but check your local regs.

Got to agree with Nanonano Feeks. Surely they would fall under 'other nanomaterials'.

Isn't this irrelavent anyway? We know NANO is contracted with STMicro to provide nano particles for SWIR sensors. Whether it's this generation or the next the company has provided timelines and stated that commercial supply contracts will materially affect the bottom line. We just have to see how that goes or wait for the company to change their guidance.

Thanks Glengarth. Good read. 400,000 - 500,000 mt by 2030 are big numbers.

Teased possible AR glasses in the run up.

Never seen that happen without institutional investors turning against the board or an activist getting involved.

We can rage against it LLoL but it's standard business practice to make these awards regardless of company or sector and regardless of performance. Got to change the system not the company in this situation.

Not really.

Unambiguous this time?

A reform initiative was kicked off in 2017. Reference form our very own Mitnz - https://www.mintz.com/insights-center/viewpoints/2017-04-18-uspto-launches-ptab-procedural-reform-initiative

I think it was still rumbling on in 2020 and 2021. So, early days as to it's effectiveness at changing the panel's reputation.

Interesting re. the blue OLED Nanonano. I've not paid to read. Could this be why Samsung's QD-OLED screens are coming in cheaper than expected?

We'll get hand slapped for talking politics but I do want to apologise to you actually amerloque. This has reminded me that Russia came up here once before and I had a bit of a rant at you. It caught me at a bad time but there's no excuse for toxic behaviour on the Internet. For now let's just say respectfully I disagree about Biden. One would think that with the immense amount of time, effort and money the nastier elements on the right throw at trying to prove something they would have turned it up if it existed.

Samsung's business model is underhand. No doubt. The only corruption near the case itself though is Gilstrap's private stock holdings. However, as discussed when that story broke his record shows that he doesn't let it influence his work and there's no suggestion he owns any stock in companies connected one way or other to our trial.

Some people have worried that Samsung's recent investment in Texas might sway the minds of people connected to the case. I don't know about that but the recent cheimcal spill shows it might not all be positive PR over there.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-01-29/samsung-austin-plant-spilled-acid-waste-for-months-probe-shows

Conspiracy theory nonsense. Biden is obviously not corrupt in any way. Nor does he have any interest in Nanoco's patent case.

Of course I'm aware of the situation between China and Taiwan. It's impossible not to be if you watch the news. It's just my opinion but I don't think China would attack because while Xi is a ruthless sociopath he has so far always behaved rationally. If I did think it were possible I would definitely sell up my IQE shares.