Member Info for Bannor

There shouldn't really be anyone living on or over the track that is not legitimately built on land owned by the occupier with permitted housing development ..... otherwise it's not their land & they had/have no right to build on it in the first place .... maybe & I say 'maybe' as a goodwill gesture it might be prudent to talk to them & attempt to assist relocation to some degree or another but there should be no obligation for us to do so unless directed or forced to do so by the courts....

...... maybe if MrC does elect to reply for himself he'll do so in a clearer, easier to follow & grammatically correct manner than I just did.... that'd be good eh CMSammy? LoL

Can't speak for MrC ..... but as for my own if you'd been here any time you'd have worked it out or know - I have a significant exposure here (believe it or not I couldn't care less) based on a belief of the 'potential' value of underlying assets.... which in my opinion has been whittled, diluted & damaged by the majority of investment/commercial decisions made over the last 6 or so years by Kiran & co - I could list them (again & for the umpteenth time) but can't be bothered & all the plaudits & rose tinted posts will not change that.

Amapa if it comes off will hopefully be truly transformational & not only finally be a feather in Kiran & Co 's cap but (Sonora news/activity) could see the back of myself from here if the price is right - so you'll potentially have a double celebration .... Will Amapa change my view on the BoD - NO .... Will I be relieved happy to see it happen - Absolutely!

If/as/when I personally feel they've damaged/diluted the potential past the point of my recovery you'll know because I shall dump my entire holding in several large lumps in short order & with nothing to support it the SP Will very likely drop as a result .... on the plus side for you though I'll be gone & you'll still be able to gang onto the director shares options being at 29p in the same way as you did when they had rewards set if/as/when we hit 2.18p (in stages) now equivalent to £2.18 a share - how did that pan out for you/us eh!

As I alluded to earlier you believe/blame what & who you like I care not but you nor anyone else will change my thoughts or how & when I share them, those I will continue to base on what I see, read, hear & my assessments thereof rather than the hope, hype, bull, guessing & assumptions many post instead...

Not sure why ******* was censored from that but just in case this is as well it was ...... W H I T L O W

You two are often callus & do ******* on sometimes, did Kiran mention anything about Mrs P - think she's been a bit lax with misleading posts on Twitter maybe he'll Cholera when he gets back...

LoL ..... I was just going to say (in defence of Kiran!!!! LoL) that it would depend in my view on the content of the ongoing exchange immediately prior to the response & if a question how it was phrased - but there you go ....

PMSL ..... hooray for the old guard!!! priceless Eric :-))

Degsie..... I was absent from posting for some months previously .... didn't stop it falling.... more recently for some weeks didn't stop it falling ..... I was present & posting freely during the rise from 3p to 30p - absolutely no effect ...... disprove anything I've posted, argue with facts & evidence that it's incorrect ... I'm very happy to be proven wrong ..... howver my presence or absence has made no difference to the share price moving ..... if it makes you feel better pointing fingers though when it suits you fine - I could give two xxxxs ..... the fact is sentiment, 'possibly' falling ore prices & people/businesses exiting took us down to the mid/low 20's where a significant seller held us there & brought us down further, that's my opinion based on what I assessed, saw, read & listened to .... there are those who just want to point fingers & assign blame whether substantiated or not & those who just deal in facts & the reality of a situation .... you carry on cuddling your security blanket of blame comforted by others that's OK & there there will all get better when that bank agreement is finalised/signed/implemented .... which is the real reason I hope Kiran is going to Brazil for with just the one bank remaining now.....

Degsie you are seriously deluded if you think anything posted on here impacts the negatively or positively on the SP. .... but hey if you want to blame something/someone for the declining SP other than market sentiment/forces enjoy

https://cdn-api.markitdigital.com/apiman-gateway/ASX/asx-research/1.0/file/2924-02429776-6A1053719?access_token=83ff96335c2d45a094df02a206a39ff4

PMSL .... why thank you Huinhwa shame you didn't ask in your own name for your own benefit really as I don't have any 'misunderstandings' about our projects as far as I'm concerned as I've read the RNS's & listened to the webinars & media but there you go...... so I assure you I need little by way of clarification as you haven't said (or should I say relayed) anything about the project triggers/timescales I wasn't aware of & I am well aware that the 'imminent' comment didn't relate to the bank sign off, others seem to have latched onto that particular comment being in reference to the banks, which was quite useful for a wind up or banter a year or so back but I rarely comment on it these days if at all as it's a bit past it's best now....

Good to know he's got free 'accommodation' but renting office space short term & needing transport because the internet is poor that made me chuckle to be fair but still a cost.... funny sort of isolation (to my mind at least) if you're freely moving around between accommodation & other point(s) in hired transport or taxi's but whatever so long as he gets out there if it's warranted ...... once again I'll pass on the offer of direct contact as I don't want or need it, I can follow the RNS's, webinars & media well enough...... unless he's told you (in strictest confidence of course!!) they're not worth the paper they're written on either & he'll tell me something else LoL ......

He said both & both are correct i.e. we get 27% for $6M & initially that's by bank agreement & the release of our $2.5M escrowed funds for 20% ........ he also said the the PFS studies also wouldn't be completed until 6 months after bank settlement .... so puts an end to those pontificating & suggesting here that the PFS is ongoing alongside waiting for the banks settlement doesn't it Obs/EV?......

Unfortunately his delivery took a step bank from the prior one but still much better than those of years ago..... & clearly more money is being swallowed by his 14 day isolation in Portugal, can't see him staying in a YMCA hostel....

No it was unpeated ... but currently considering purchasing another which if so will be peated :-))

That's a whisky maturing in a PJ butt of course... in case of confusion!!

Talking of Spirits MLQ ... I got a sample from my private cask (Pedro Jimenez sherry butt) to taste the week before last (currently 3 years & 3 months into a 10 year wait) .... absolutely divine & I'd be more than happy to bottle it now .... but as with Cadence I'm hoping the wait will be worth it eventually NM NM ... :-)

EVB 12:06 if there's confusion it's not of my making is it both 26% & 29% have been used in RNS's issued today on AIM .... maybe a correction should be issued who knows what the rules are & which is correct .... what Kiran said is irrelevant it's what's published & in the public domain that markets & traders will use as reference & they currently are not aligned properly....

tallying gains .... now that'd make a pleasant change, yes indeedy like many I'm hoping Kiran's visit is for more than reading a PFS on something we own nothing off cuttently ..... you never know with the right SP you might all see the back of me forever ..... that'd be music to many LoL

No MLQ Castillo are offering A$3M of shares ( which are variable) staged on drill results so who knows over what timeframe ultimately .... & this is for 100% of LT & LS of which Cadence owns between 26&29% depending on what announcement/document you base that % on.... what makes you think we're swapping our 29% for A$3M under what circumstances/structure from the RNS's issued by us & Castillo?

EVB @ your 10:55..... think I'll take my lead from the RNS's rather than Twitter, no idea who's responsible for posting comments up but that one doesn't tally with the RNS's issued does it.....

Indeed MrsB .... also MBW has referred to 25.85% in the interims .... whatever it still looks to me as successful (i.e. poor) as the investments in Auroch/Leogang eh ... another to add to my list.... LoL

I'd be very happy for someone to unequivocally prove otherwise - but won't be holding my breath!!