Member Info for Banburyboy

Robins to be clear.

The source of needing 186 wash plants to throughput 1,100 plants is page 12 of RRRs own Biballe presentation.

Best case 6 tonnes per hour per wash plant ( base 4 tonnes).

He will run away from this just as he runs away from the 200 tonnes of Lithium not existing as he's been rumbled. It's to easy ;)

1,100 tonnes per hour throughput.

2 grammes per tonne extracted.

2,200 grammes of gold @ 28 grammes to an ounce 78 ounces of gold per hour.

At ridiculous Helpful cost of $350 to 500 per ounce. He uses his GCSE economics to tell us it all about Marginal cost.

So those figures would result in RRR being in the world's top ten gold miners in terms of gold sales / production and the most profitable in the world by a margin of three fold.

He has recklessly thrown one isolated fact out to posters in a pathetic attempt to lure the unsuspecting into this sham of a company.

The SP is still going down for a reason. FASO is hyperbole and chances of success are remote.

Even if it is successful he would have sold a fair proportion of Greenstones [ the FASO company] to Riverstones for them stumping up the seed finance.

It's a final throw of the dice as there are £4m plus of debts on RRR balance sheet and DRC and Tin Hill have failed so they need a quick result.

It might cone good and save our bacon but not at the numbers Helpful quotes.

The SP is reflective of all these facts.

What's sad is he's a financial advisor. The rest you know.

So News YES / NO to 1,100 tonnes an hour. Resounding No.

A proper financial advisor would lay it out in layman's terms.

The pub has space to fit 1,200 drinkers FACT.

But they can't drink 1,200 pints because

We have a slow pipe ( the wash plant )and one barmaid can only serve 6 pints an hour.

We could employ 180 barmaids but imagine all the capacity constraints and costs . Its a nonsense.

Our resident cheat picks on on unrelated fact machine theoretical capacity and misleads people into thinking that has a direct link through to production. He deliberately chooses to ignore all other assumptions . Ask yourself why ? Because its his job to mislead

If Helpfull and his mates and all those close to this questionably run company believed all this superlative tosh they would be buying in spades.

They are not no one is buying and it's why we have sales of 0.047p.

Helpful is here to get his placing shares away for the next rinse and repeat.

Thankfully no one buys it anymore

More scumbag misleading by the resident insider who has the audacity to challenge others intellect.

Throughput is a function of many factors not least washing the alluvial. Helpful misleads us all by talking of 1,100 tones throughput per hour.

Page 12 of RRRs April 24 Bibelle presentation has the COMPANIES OWN sensitivity analysis.

The upper extreme of throughput is determined by washplant capacity and in RRRs most recent presentation is no more than 6 tonnes per hour for ten hours per wash plant.

To achieve 1,100 per hour as our resident con man is suggesting we would need ( do the maths as he would say) 182 wash plants. One hundred and eighty two.

These are not my figures but RRRs.

Common sense and any degree of intelligence says he's wrong and as ever misleading people.

End to end throughput of 1,100 tonnes per hour is what billion dollar companies do and RRR is not one of them.

AiM the man is absolute shister no ifs no buts.

He would be quite surprised at how well educated some of his detractors are. They don't need to boast about it and have a moral compass.

Nike he's conflicted and has a moral and ethical duty not to post at all.

We're his name News or Maidit no one would give a fig.

I can't see any mitigation. Best we agree to disagree. I've spend 20 years as a NED albeit in the public sector but this one is cut and dried IMO.

Enjoy your weekend.

Nike

Helpful has the following form

1 1 -5million tonnes from Tin Hill.

2 - costs of FASO $350 -$500 per ounce

3 - throughput 1,100 tonnes per hour

4 - FASO production mid April this week or next.

Sorry these are not mishaps but a continued pattern of deliberate deceit.

Each to his own and yes enjoy your weekend

Nike - you are considered in your posts.

You know Helpful is an insider - buys placings, he's never lost on RRR shares, owns CLNs, owns 10% of ALR is in constant contact with AB.

He has posted superlatives ( not facts) for years on this company. Its declined for years and cost those who have relied on his advice a fortune.

I cannot see how any balance right minded fair person would see that as right or fair.

Are you really defending him. As Dukey says Helpful is why so many bashers are on here.

I virtually live on here as I think it's the worst ethical behaviour I've ever seen. The man is contemptible. This is an emotional post as right and wrong to an old timer like me is important.

Turner pope reference 8m cubic foot per day in Q4 and Q1.

Anybody know what that is in terms of daily revenue.

Many thanks

Due diligence ended 19th April according to heads of terms.

Condition E

" RRR confirm by close of due diligence it has access to the funding required for the settlement of amounts due on completion and on- going financing of NBGC and RRAL'

IMO only but I think this could be a real stumbling block and explain why due diligence confirmation is two weeks later.

As is oftern said far too many spinning plates

Great Post talkinto.

I normally run works families sweepstakes and like odds.

The combination of 9 and 11 - dilution and below 0.05p is I would venture the red hot favourite.

Helpful I'm sure will combine all the good news 1-6 with a share price above 0.06p.

RRR watching is compelling viewing.

Yes dukey Trust is a huge problem with RRR.

Anything they say is not really believed ( imminent, first Lithium exports, wash plant).

If they sad they received the $7m I think most would want proof after Greenland.

I'm sorry to say this but what will move the price ?

Very excited by this it could be huge.

5.22 to sell now

I can sell 100k for 5.11p on H/L

And I can retire - more chance of the moon being made of Cheese than this "shower" getting to 0.3p.

Continued posting by the granny mugger insider does RRR no good.

I disagree Helpful.

FACT dukey has called this share 100% right for a long time. The one poster who is constantly wrong is Helpful aka Stephen Paul Lundy.

By his own admission he is a confidante of AB and a company insider.

This makes you constantly being wrong all the more concerning as it could be argued you have misled shareholders.

You kindly posted your solicitors name should anyone posting on here want it.

News glad you enjoyed the sun.

Your 19.15 post was well written structured and clear.

I think other posters will agree its a far better style to read.

Good luck with the investment.

It's a transfer from trading accout to SIPP or ISA - nothing more.

I'm afraid you can't wish this over the line it's a dog maidit

Maid it your not the sharpest knife in the block but even Help will tell you the consideration is capped at $3m.

That's been discussed on here dozens of time