George Frangeskides, Chairman at ALBA, explains why the Pilbara Lithium option ‘was too good to miss’. Watch the video here.
Money coming back into oil and gas stocks and which O&G stock out there has better financials than us? Don't forget that the BP debt will be cleared shortly adding millions of £s in cashflow to UOG.
https://oilprice.com/Energy/Energy-General/Oil-And-Gas-Stocks-Are-Popular-Once-Again.html
https://oilprice.com/Latest-Energy-News/World-News/Oil-Prices-Could-Explode-As-US-Largest-Storage-Hub-Nears-Empty.html
Director share buying.
SLF72
I wouldn't think hospitals would be allowed to source the gas elsewhere as it is seeking approval as a drug device combo so I expect that any sales of Xenon gas for patients would have to come through Polarean.
First article below about lithium but the argument is there for the benefits of battery storage and its crucial role in the transition to green energy. We obviously would say that Vanadium redox flow batteries have more benefits over lithium ones.
Also China is probably going to lead the way on mass vanadium flow battery adoption.
https://oilprice.com/Latest-Energy-News/World-News/Billionaire-Oil-Trading-Veteran-Bets-Big-On-Batteries.html
https://www.argusmedia.com/en/news/2253359-chinese-firms-to-promote-vanadium-energy-storage
Hi Testing321
I can see that now thanks. Apologies.
Why would it be a write-off? There is an option into BMN shares also which can be later sold into the market or retained as they are at year lows.
A quick look and they seem to have just increased their holding slightly so likely bought from the impatient sellers. Some big purchases have been showing in the daily trades in the last few weeks.
https://www.lse.co.uk/rns/DNL/holdings-in-company-ygjhwmhkf19pmh0.html
Meant to finish that and say it was on in the background while I was doing something else so will listen more carefully later
These results were already flagged earlier in the year. Listened to the presentation this morning - had it on in the background.
I'm more positive about the company after listening to the presentation and feel they will succeed in Europe with the roll out for Efmody and also therefore for rest of the world.
Everyone should report the imposter!
Since when have you gained the ability to advise on fundamentals or technical analysis as you have been asking others for help or thanking them for advising you to sell:
"HalfSovereign
Posted in: ARCM
Posts: 91
Price: 5.55
No Opinion
Thanks for the advice .09 Jun 2021 13:59
Just like to thank the gentleman that advised me to sell here when this was 6.5p.
You sir are a gentleman.
I invested the money elsewhere and it's doing well.
Thanks again."
"HalfSovereign
Posted in: PRD
Posts: 91
Price: 7.95
No Opinion
Cash position07 Jul 2021 10:59
Can anyone give me an idea on the remainder Ng cash position here please?
Plus will they need to raise cash for further drilling ?
Thanks"
Here's your earlier UOG posts:
"HalfSovereign
Posted in: UOG
Posts: 91
Price: 5.00
No Opinion
RE: Egypt and Italy06 Apr 2021 21:43
I had 17p written down myself for end of this year but looks like I will have to up that a bit .
Not complaining either.
Keep buying on the dips people .
This looks a fabulous opportunity .
Plus we have not really even started yet ."
"HalfSovereign
Posted in: UOG
Posts: 91
Price: 5.10
No Opinion
RE: Pay27 Apr 2021 16:20
I get the questions on this but this is not ukog .
We can see the progress and so far I'm happy to hold for mid cap status in the future.
I would also like to see a share buy back to reduce the number of shares in issue ."
Does this make you a ramper? How have the fundamentals changed for you to change your opinion? Your earlier posts were from 3-4 months ago and the fundamentals have got better since then with the newsflow. And yes you can ask a friend.
Judging by your other posts you're just a deramper and ramper when it suits your purpose - for example deramping 88e at around 1p and now over 2p and Asiamet as being worth 5p ish when it was around 2p.
So transparent and many people do say a lot worse when they come across this type of behaviour.
You are getting your cases confused. What I posted is not about defamation/slander but market manipulation.
I see you mentioning the warrants and the share price fall but you were the one who was posting multiple posts a day at the time. Where's our friend Batch posting about the company going broke, this is creating a false impression of the value of the company - "It is an offence for a person to act or engage in a course of conduct which creates a false or misleading impression as to the market in, or the price or value of, any relevant investments."
I see you have posted a lot and personal attacks on the CEO.
Bebeto
I think I will email the company and ask them to investigate further.
Link to criminal charges for share manipulation. Misleading impressions seems quite wide:
"Making misleading statements (section 89) – It is an offence for a person to make a statement or to conceal facts with the intention of inducing another person either to enter into or to refrain from entering into a relevant agreement or to exercise, or refrain from exercising, any rights conferred by a relevant instrument."
"Misleading impressions (section 90) – It is an offence for a person to act or engage in a course of conduct which creates a false or misleading impression as to the market in, or the price or value of, any relevant investments."
https://www.gtlaw.com/en/insights/2019/1/the-financial-conduct-authority-part-1-market-manipulation
Nothing wrong with a bit of debate as long as it's factual. What's objectionable about that?
Don't think you're invested over there anymore as you haven't posted recently - it's quite obvious when you are or aren't in a share due to the nature of your posting history at the time. You might have even left Zen now. We need to get to you early to warn you of the error of your ways.
I don't see you raising any issues about the Genl director sales:
On 12 May 2021 each of Esa Ikaheimonen, Mike Adams, and Paul Weir exercised options granted to them under the Company's share schemes and sold sufficient shares to cover tax liabilities arising as a result of their option exercises.
These were nil cost options as well.
I'm happy to visit you on your share boards to discuss the merits of your investment decisions if you like. Perhaps others may be happy to oblige as well.
Sorry the madness was here before I posted I'm trying to restore some sanity. My post was very factual. I called out the blatant inconsistencies in a posters posting history - do you have anything to say about that and if not why not?
I called out our FCA regulated financial advisor posting rubbish about the company which we are still waiting for him to back up with evidence. Anything to say about this poster and if not why not or is this your idea of alternative commentary? Are people allowed to post fake news - is that the sort of discussion you want to see on this board?
Doesn't cause consternation - it's more to provide some sort of objective information for potential new investors looking in.
(continued)
It doesn't help Levi when you give such posters a get out of jail free card - it calls into question your own credibility.
No witch-hunt just facts taken from guess where your very own posts. The quality of the deramping is very poor on this board when posters forget what they wrote previously. What does the bashers guide say - one of the methods is to try to gain trust and then start bashing the share.
I had, when I posted earlier, only picked up on the one post where you said that you weren't expecting anything from Jamaica and then your position turned into you bought in for Jamaica but this is not what you posted at the time before you allegedly bought in and since then also:
"Bought in for Jamaica. Thought the company is self funded with the potential of Jamaica.. if that doesn’t go, I’m disappointed. It is what it is."
Yet you knew about Jamaica on the 29th June 2021 when you posted: "Jamaica should be treated as a bonus if it happens?" this was before your post on 1st July when you said you had bought in - so you knew the position clearly with Jamaica before you say you bought in.
However, your attempts to wriggle out of this difficulty calling it a witch hunt made me look through your other posts as well and it's a position you have maintained all the way through:
3rd July 2021 post:
"Personally I see Jamaica a bonus if/when it happens. Funding first then successful exploration.. it’s not the easiest location I presume?"
4th July post:
"If it comes off then it’s excellent. Whereas Egypt is current."
Lords
"Posted in: UOG
Posts: 63
Price: 4.35
No Opinion
RE: Jamaica05 Jul 2021 11:41
Highly unlikely if not impossible. The cost will be enormous. They’d have to raise a lot of fund. Share cap will be billions and billions. They need funding partners. Even then with successful exploration they might still need to raise fund."
"Lords
Posted in: UOG
Posts: 63
Price: 4.05
No Opinion
RE: Jamaica07 Jul 2021 16:17
Even if they’re going it alone they’ll have to partner someone further down the line developing. But of course if they do find oil it’s easier to find funding. I cannot see them taking the risk do it themselves, a lot of money needed. Other’s opinion welcome. That’s the reason I always see J as a bonus if it happens. I hope I’m very very wrong and it won’t be the first time I’m wrong."
"Lords
Posted in: UOG
Posts: 63
Price: 4.175
No Opinion
RE: Jamaica07 Jul 2021 17:15
Crowdfunding, I hope you don’t mean it literally :)) I’m not saying it won’t happen, I’m saying they need funding and funding is hard to come by but as you say they’re all moneymen they should have ways. Enjoy England tonight. They’ve made it twice hopefully third time too."
"Lords
Posted in: UOG
Posts: 63
Price: 4.175
No Opinion
RE: Jamaica07 Jul 2021 21:35
What do you think? If at 4p, then it’s 1 billion shares, and it won’t be at 4p, it’ll be below that. I cannot see them doing that. We need funding. They might find someone and give away 70% or something. Who knows."
It doesn't help Levi when you give such posters a get out of