Member Info for avocet123

We had a vote in the 70s which was to stay in. To have the 2016 referendum was undemocratic, so we might as well have another one.

Yes, may doesn't want a clean and desastrous brexit, and for that I congratulate her.

Wouldn't worry about it. For me these are definitely a long term hold. Until I am happy to sell I will collect divis.

Tariff free trade without UK farmers getting an EU rebate. All UK farmers will go to the wall.

FYI we had a referendum in the 70s. Remain one. 2016 remain lost very narrowly. Its one all. Best out of free?
Why are you so afraid of another referendum?
Ps the referendum was not legally binding, only a recommendation.

Sorry its only 39 billion. Even less. And besides they are commitments made which we should actually honour.

49 billion lol hardly an incentive. Do you guys realize that it's peanuts compared to the 5 billion a week the UK currently exports to the EU? The EU couldn't care less about it and even compared to the UK 1.8 trillion gdp its a drop in the ocean.

I am quite content with the fact that I can stay as long as I want plus go to Europe whenever I wish to. Thanks.
No need to fear for me.

Longtimeinvestor. Is that a threat? Post reported.

61 days for brexit to die a slow death. I think it may be much sooner. Even your own parliamentarians are hell bent on stopping brexit.

Can't wait till article 50 is pulled or second referendum, so we can concentrate on lloy again. Very soon I suspect. Brexit is dead.

Good that others are finally clocking onto what casapinos has been doing here for weeks. Not being invested, but constantly providing very carefully worded commentary on the dangers and risks to sxx. For what purpose, I wonder.

This share is a long term investment.(a minimum of 5 years)

Oh the irony. Thats exactly what I have kept telling myself. Starting in 2012. If I knew then what I know now, I would have told myself that this is a long term investment, a minimum of 15 years.

EU has got the UK by the balls. Thank god. Can't trust our bunch to make any good decisions anyway.

In a no deal scenario the hard border is instant. Really genius to say that in a no deal scenario there is no back stop. Can't insure against something that already happened.

Very true. We all know $600m MAY be raised by equity,but to report it as though it is a fact is extremely dubious, if I made laws, it would be illegal. Someone needs to tell them to wind their necks in.

https://www.fool.co.uk/investing/2019/01/27/why-i-think-time-could-be-running-out-for-the-sirius-minerals-share-price/

Writes as if the 600m dollar will be raised as equity as if it was a certainty.

Just refresh and it will show all of the idiotic dribble.

Hmm hopefully ADM have enough money left in the coffers to still jump-start sxx if need be....

Applegarth, it's simple. The buy sell figures are wrong. Sales show as buys and vica versa all the time. They are flawed.

LiTC, you have heard it yourself in the conf call. Cf has said himself that the 400 to 600 will be spent first before any other debt kicks in. That means to me, share issue first, then agree the high yield, possibly convertible bond, before commercial and ipa debt. He even suggested that the ipa won't come into play at all. That's why I think the placing is not avoidable, and the earlier it comes the better. Or does anyone think it is advantageous to wait until the sp has drifter to 15p and the placing will go at a discount from there?