RE: Sell off22 Sep 2023 13:22
RonR I’m not sure you understand, the fundamentals have changed my friend. Trust me, I’ve been holding AML since Stroll came in early 2020. I’ve ridden through the good, the bad and the downright ugly. So I haven’t just lost the plot, it’s a calculated exit based on the market environment, macro environment and core fundamentals. Saying AML’s investment and plans can just “spread over the longer term” is nonsense. The deal with Lucid is inked and signed, The shares have been handed over the initial cash paid, plus billions more to be handed over the next how many years. You think LUCID is going to say ‘aww shucks, Aston Martin, looks like your plans are delayed, don’t mind paying us back the money you owe us right now, you can spread it over 60 monthly payments?’ - NO. And even if that fantasy existed, there’s a thing called interest which would surely need to be paid on top to cover the delay - adding to Aston Martin’s debt pile. And regarding choices, look. Aston Martin could have been one of the first to launch an all electric line up, I believe Lamborghini, Ferrari & co. are a little further away in achieving this. But with this delay, they’ll be very much back in play. And with that increased level of choice, Aston Martin’s lead advantage is gone. I’m not saying the rich aren’t going to buy an electric Aston Martin, of course they will. But Aston’s share of the luxury high performance EV market sales will be reduced with more competition. Look at the DBX, you know why it’s done so well? Because it was the first proper (not based on a general platform) high end luxury SUV. It had tons of market share and basically pulled AML out of the grave. AML needs to lead with the launches if it’s to have a solid chance of generating the kind of sales forecasted. And right now I don’t see that happening because the rich will want to hang on to ICE’s as long as possible - they just put more of a smile on your face.