Member Info for AndroclesB

If the business is successful, ultimately none of it matter a jot, except for investors who may regret selling over the last 2 weeks.

If PRD goes down the pan, well from my point of view, it was a risk reward play I was happy to take.

If they work for some dodgy financial house, it may be mission accomplished for now, and they disappear.

If they are just mischievous individuals, the might be around for some time yet.

If they are fellow, concerned investors ….. will, maybe not.

It’s brilliant that GRH is staying.

Just be aware that his content rich, intriguing posts will provide plenty of scope for the crew to argue the toss, misrepresent etc, so I don’t expect them to disappear any time soon.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AcrVl_FRvdg

:-)

Amanda, you expect PRD to put out an RNS arguing with speculation on a bulletin board ?????

A.few years ago Radio4s book of the week was “The role of homosexuality in the chivalry code of the medieval knight” It was written by Randy Bumgardener.

Don’t think he’s related to Lonnie, and of course it means person who tends a forest.

My bad, never invested there so unaware of the consolidation.

Nige, a dog that’s currently trading at 186p?

Tim

"There is much going on across the board at Predator and not JUST in Morocco, I am happy to continue to keep the company in the Bucket List"

Hope the emphasis helps, as I’m not sure anyone could interpret that as “forget Morocco”

In what respect …?

I had an anti vax newspaper put through my door today.

Just saying.

Lies?

Please go back to citing your silly CO2 research database.

Hopefully see you on the other side of Predators brilliant strategy of running a responsible energy company, and both Morocco, PRG and all of us benefit.

Hi Kas, yes you are correct. CO2 levels are but one factor, and just because in some circumstances they are beneficial when elevated it isn’t a general principle.

I was merely dealing with Pawn’s assertions that elevating CO2 was generally beneficial to life, and then his implication that because submariners could deal with elevated CO2, it is always a good thing.

Hence I applied the same argument to O2 which is perceived to be “good”, even though it lethal to some organisms. Oh, ands it’s absurdum. Must stop rushing posts when on iPhone!

Sorry if I was a bit cryptic.

Nope, elevated oxygen levels will damage or even kill you.

Likewise CO2.

Agreed Passer.

PRD have an important role to play in a balanced energy strategy, so let’s get back to that.

Reductio ad adsurbium.

02 is toxic, so perhaps we should get rid of that?

Useful, as in cherry picked. Over to you

This is a bit like watching Wimbledon.

Of course CO2 is good for plant life, in fact early earth’s atmosphere was so rich in it that only plants could survive. Over the millennia this vegetation sequestered the CO2 as coal etc such that other life forms could develop. We have had relatively balanced eco system for a few thousand years which is now becoming unbalanced - increasing human population, and increasing consumption levels being a major factor.

How we live sustainably is a massive question, and I don’t think electric cars or purely sustainable energy are the answers, we need a very sophisticated, multi disciplinary approach, but quoting these guys as the answer it certainly ain’t :

“The Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change (AKA the Idso family) ranked Number eight on a list of the “Dirty Dozen of Climate Change Denial” compiled by Mother Jones in 2009. [4]

In addition to receiving at least $100,000 from Exxon Mobil (See funding below), Mother Jones reports the Idso family has further ties to the energy industry. In the early 2000s, Craig Idso was the director of environmental science at Peabody Energy, the world’s largest privately owned coal company. Craig and Keith Idso are both tied to the Western Fuels Association. In October, 1999, they assisted in publishing a report for the Greening Earth Society (a group funded and controlled by Western Fuels) titled “Forecasting World Food Supplies: The Impact of the Rising Atmospheric CO2 Concentration,” as Idso announced in a separate CO2 Science article. [4], [5]”

So there is no loss of habitat or biodiversity? I never mentioned warming, but that’s another discussion.

I’m sure they’ll be over the moon as there’ll be no habitat left for them to make use of all that lovely CO2