Member Info for AndroclesB

Oh dear, I wasn’t wrong the clues about the M/O were there from the beginning, but benefit of the doubt wasted again.

I don’t know who the intended audience is, but all sensible folk have evaluated the risk reward ratios, and positive/negative evidence, and taken a position they are comfortable with.

Having someone bang on perpetually about the risks is utterly superfluous.

Anyway - any clue as to why the post count remains stubbornly at 6.? LSE glitch, or something else going on?

Indeed.

I saw this one coming a couple of days ago, but hoped I was wrong. Hope I still am.

“50k investment by Lonny can be seen as a level of commitment, but it can also be seen as a lack of commitment...I mean that if I were a director of PRD and I could see sure evidence of a tsunami of money on the way, I think I would probably buy as much as I could. 50k seems a little uncommitted in this light.....perhaps...”

Lonny will have to trouser up nearly 500k to exercise all his options .

“Really, I'm trying to be the Devils advocate, put myself in PG's shoes, and try to look at the situation from both prospectives.”

Thanks for your help. It’s perspectives by the way.

“And I believe all shareholders should be thus engaged....its your money they are investing for us.”

Our money. Freudian slip.

They’ll be able to share a copy.

Just sense checking my findings

Looks like ex Divi date is 5 May, so,it should be possible to protect 20k worth of holding and divis with a 22_23 bed and isa

‘Twas ever thus. Ordinary folk manipulated and chucked in the meat grinder for no good reason by power crazed idiots. Any other interpretation is sophistry.

Who are the globalists?

Wouldn’t mind a chat with one of them.

I’ll second that Sefty, old chap.

The perp had previous too, and then what was putting that poem up all about? Either a get out of jail attempt or a feeble attempt at psychological manipulation which was incoherently boasting about yesterday.

Not sure why Putin would need Ukraine to drop their guard before nuking them. Have they got got some wonder defence system we don’t know about?

Of course you always start a negotiation by saying what your final position is …..

Thanks for the POLY shout out.

It’s providing a bit of entertainment on the side.

From the BeeB

A few moments ago it was confirmed that the US and EU have agreed a major deal on liquefied natural gas - a move intended to reduce Europe's reliance on Russian energy.

But even if the US significantly increases supplies of liquefied natural gas to Europe, for the EU's 27 member states it is only a start.

The EU will still need to find other producers if they're to move away from Russian gas and hit their target of cutting imports by two-thirds this year.

Last year the EU imported 155 billion cubic metres of Russian gas. That's around 40% of its gas imports. Germany alone imports 55% of its gas from Russia, and it's already suspended the opening of a new Russian pipeline called Nord Stream 2.

Last year the EU said it received almost a quarter of its liquefied gas from the US, so if the US increases its supplies by an extra 15 billion cubic metres, that will make a big difference.

But it also raises big questions.

Qatar and Russia are the other big exporters and Qatar says it cannot divert much more to Europe.

On top of that, there is limited availability in liquefied natural gas terminals in Europe, which are already operating at high capacity.

There are 24 large-scale terminals in the EU - they're essential for "regasifying" liquefied imports. Spain has most capacity but limited pipelines to the rest of Europe.

Germany is also looking beyond the US for LNG supplies and has been talking to Norway for shipments in time for next winter.

Wow.

Funny old world.

Saw that yesterday on the Beeb.

Utterly bizarre. What’s he going to do with all the roubles, plus the exchange rate completely works against him.

I presume we’re the only option?

To cut to the chase, didn’t they owe us some money, and are we now expecting their CO2 EOR to be revenue generating for us.

I’m travelling atm so don’t have chance to go back through old RNSs etc.

Sefton, I am most certainly not against green technologies, but as you will agree, it is important that we realise these are complex, subtle issues, not solved by grand gestures, or ludicrous tax breaks.

Ps. If he exercises all his options he’s in for nearly 500k

Obvs.

He would like a bigger slice than even his options provide, and is prepared to pay a healthy price for them.

Closed trading periods will mean this ain’t a “flipping” strategy.

I certainly can’t imagine anything like MrParsons shameful trading plan coming into play here !

MEM - Looks like we crossed in the post!

I remember reading a study a few years back which examined to total lifespan carbon footprint of building, running and scrapping a car.

The most efficient was …… an old Jeep Wrangler. Terrible fuel consumption, but made of cast iron and mild steel, so easy to manufacture and recycle. Plus it uses fuel directly, no losses in generation, transmission, charging c/W batteries.

It seems to me CO2 efficient vehicles are probably small efficient ICEs, not enormous battery powered SUVs, or supercars.