Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
Be careful with viletrader, he only joined this forum to contact woodstock1970.
Think of it like Gary Glitter trying to contact Jimmy Savile and you'll get the picture, puke.
I'd take the lottery numbers back for a handful of draws for myself, family and close friends.
mrcosts - "letting RM off the hook just because the sun is shining is a bit strange" says the gobshyte who was giving it large on here about how he was going to the AGM and then spectacularly shyt the bed when he realised he was soft in the head and let RM off, lol!
Ha, ha, ha, that cN only be another massive whooossshh for axe-capital.
Axe-Capital, massive whooossshh, making himself look this as pig shyt again, lol!
Lol! If you say so.
I probably hold a lot more shares than you but I bought in march 2020, went through the ups to 70p and back down to 30p before p2. Sold 33%, banked the profit I hoped for when I first bought, and left the rest.
P3 cost me a lot of paper profit, but that was my choice.
I have absolutely no empathy for cretins who whinge about their abysmal personal investment choices, sorry.
doc.daneeka - "RM didn't"
Of course he did.
They obviously believed, were convinced, that the trial would be a success and acted accordingly, the likes of mrcosts would have been bleating even louder had the trial been a success but the business floundered due to a lack of forward planning.
Also, he wasn't risking his own money, profits maybe (tell me about it) but it wasn't going to cost him his family savings like, for example, the cretin and proven liar aka Shoots101 aka...... org39, SanFran01, nemo100, Seb46, Aston01, Dan100, ProfSH, B747 who lost everything.
It seems, from the bleating, it was only mrcosts money they lost though.
It is inconceivable that mrcosts, or anyone else for that matter, didn't research the risk of a failed trial.
Imm and farn spelt it out in big sesame street style so there really is no excuse is there?
I'll answer that myself, anyone who lost after the p3 results who is now squealing like a biatch rather than blaming themselve for being a moron is a moron.
professional, which mrcosts "logic" can't you fault?
Is it the moaning like a ***** or buying around 300,000 shares since p3?
Asking for a friend.
mrcosts, or Fred if you like, I've never heard or read polygon squealing like a *****.
What is your point?
mrcosts, obviously not, your theory would make you the Fred west of the forum.
Maybe people share your disappointment on how this has worked out but think squealing like *****, while buying around 300,000 more shares since p3, isn't a good look?
Be careful with viletrader, he only joined this forum to contact woodstock1970.
Think of it like Gary Glitter trying to contact Jimmy Savile and you'll get the picture, puke.
Yeah yeah, it's not fair
Yeah yeah, it's not fair
(I'm so upset)
I'm so upset, I'm so upset, yeah yeah
The quote says this....
"The medics warn, however, that the emergence of new variants of Covid has meant neutralising antibody treatments are now largely ineffective. "
But doc.daneeka thinks it means this....
The medics warn, however, that the possible emergence of new variants of Covid could mean neutralising antibody treatments may be largely ineffective.
That'll be a GCSE comprehension fail.
Polygon went above 5% on the 13 April 21 and were at 18% prior to 21 Feb this year.
I don't know how many of the sub 5% were bought before 20 July 2020, and I can't be bothered to go through the rns history, but I'd guess a very conservative average of 140p for that 18%.
They've added another 10% since, again I'm guessing an average of 20p.
Overall the average is going to be £1 +/- a few pence.
I doubt they will increase to 30% but if they did so before 21 Feb next year I reckon they will have to offer something over 170p, so while they could increase to 30% "anytime they want" it probably would not make sense to do it before then.
The 35p bid is based on nothing, I doubt they've paid more than 25p since 21 Feb this year, and their highest purchase price since then could be less than that. If they do increase to 30% they can offer what they like but not less than their highest purchase price in the preceding 12 months.
Is that the "different story" you referred to?
"But Poly would not waste their time and money on a bid that had no hope
of succeeding would they?"
Err, yes they did.
https://www.sharecast.com/news/aim-bulletin/watchstone-rejects-final-offer-from-polygon--8077200.html
Manifesto - "Talk of a bid is unfounded..."
Polygon are within 2% of triggering a bid.
They obviously know the takeover code and probably won't increase to 30%, but they are close and they've done it before, albeit unsuccessfully.
A bid is unlikely imo but due to the takeover code the talk is well founded.
Polygon did make an offer for watchstone last year but it wasn't successful as not enough shareholders accepted it.
Therefore it wouldn't be a complete surprise if polygon went to 30% to trigger an offer, but only after 21 Feb 23. I don't know what the highest price they have paid since 21st Feb this year, but whatever it is that would be the minimum they are obliged to offer if they did hold 30% or more.
The rampers like manifesto are not a "danger" unless you're stupid (I understand why axe-capital thinks she's dangerous, derrr) her ramps are based on obvious speculation, only an idiot would take them as fact rather than opinion.
The dangerous cretinous rampers are the likes of sharesting (thankfully disappeared up his own arse) and citytrader, who took such a big bath on 21 Feb he has sunk without trace. The itk types and their continual secret squirrel ******.
I note the secret squirrel has been resurrected this morning.