RE: Tyndrum Inn11 Apr 2023 00:40
TB: You blanking me on the LHS/grades questions? I think the market will respond a bit more unfavourably to my question than whether I attend an AGM or whether I know my age. I'll do you a favour here. Whoever you seem to think I am... I'm not. Will I tell you why? Because i'm not some old guy pretending to be 35 if thats what you're now alluding too. Just like when samson also said i'm not this that or the other. I don't tell lies, i've no need to tell lies and if I wanted to manipulate anything - which I don't - then you're currently doing a much better job than anyone ever could, by avoiding critical questions.
Samson: You believe what you want as you misconstrue various "facts" in some wierd way to try and paint a picture that i'm some 007 and you know my investments better than me, while saying nothing of your own. I'm guessing you're some old farmer who tells everyone he used to be an engineer who has about 5k invested and is bricking it because after 10 years of nonsense, he might have to own up to the wife that he's lost their retirement funds. If i'm wrong, i'd be about as accurate as you are on me. I've told you before, ask me a question, i'll answer it. It's a shame you can't offer the same courtesy.
On the legal aspect. It's a police matter to pump a price knowing the company is facing insolvency so in theory it wouldn't take much to open a case. Look at the SNP just recently. Not withstanding that, I would simple file for looses incurred as a result of improper practices and in the course or pre-trading pre court information, the firms involved would produce productions for the defence. Witnesses would include firms mentioned. You wouldn't even need to take it to trial because the information released prior would do the job itself. But you crack on with your legal abilities, your 007 abilities, your investing credentials etc etc etc. The master of none.