Member Info for Amtech

For a start it’s not really any concern of yours what type of person I am, as I have no influence on the board it matter not, right.

You know nothing about me Danny, now you are digging into personality outside of posting on a BB. I think it’s you that needs to look in the mirror.

Well then you ask for all you get.

Whoever doesn’t like what I post use the filter, it’s why it’s there.

Is that the same as the ‘well done’ you gave everyone for calling the downtrend city on basically shocking results with constant betting of the sp/attacks on people who disagreed with you. Although it is good that some have made their funds back. But like I say until they issue results I’ll reserve judgement on the BOD, break even by Xmas is that Gross or Net ?

Danny, do I have to read every single day ‘this is only going one way’ , ‘massive order been filled’ , a list of all the unknown trades that are all apparently buys that I can see for myself anyway etc etc. Will these smiley face comments alter the news from the company?

Past expectations here have not matched the results Danny so until things are confirmed with positive results i’ll remain cautious. I don’t see a problem with that.

Explain it then.

Well why not explain it then instead of acting like Gordon Burns, surely it’s a positive for the board. I’m sure others would like to know.

“The Company currently expects that investors will exercise a mixture of the 0.039p and 0.15p warrants”

You conveniently left this bit out.

My point to you City was that why would ICAM buy at 0.35 when they have 1.2B @ 0.039 or 15.85% and 605m warrants at 0.039 still to exercise taking their holding to 27.36% of the company. You are suggesting that it’s ICAM still buying and the order is not filled, my opinion is they are not. Deal with it. If the companies new venture was doing that strongly behind the scenes why did MOS give them such a discount and so much of the company for so little? If they supplied them with info that will materially change the SP surely that info would have to be out in the open. As for the accusation finger comment, you did see the revenue over the last few years didn’t you, the failure after failure, placing after placing. You of all people have no place to call anybody silly, especially after you dismissed any of the problems highlighted to you over those years. Next news/results will out what this new venture is or isn’t and whether this rise has any substance.

Plus, where are all these shares coming from if all these ‘unknown’ trades are buys. Anybody got any theories?

It’ll never happen Hodge I'm afraid, as long as you post positivity no one will attack. Although it was a simple question, and a very valid one. Why hasn’t a TR-1 been issued if a company (Icam) has bought 15.85% of MOS as stated within an RNS and stated on MOS’s website.

……waiting for this massive order TR-1 should be anytime now.

So you don’t think they check ?

Their rules not mine

No need to cry, it was only a question.

If lots of stock are in sticky hands where are all these millions of unknown ‘buys’ getting their stock from?

Count the management within ‘those type of people’ leathal

Really, what about the misleading statements from them? That was wrong on many levels